HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011956.jpg
Extracted Text (OCR)
http://www. washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/20 | 4/04/2 | /eleventh-circuit-rules-
that-discovery-can-move-forward-on-my-crime-victims-rights-act-case/
The Volokh Conspiracy
Eleventh Circuit rules that discovery can
move forward on my Crime Victims’ Rights
Act case
By Paul Cassell April 21
On Friday,the 11th Circuit ruled that discovery can move forward in an important Crime
Victims’ Rights Act case that my co-counsel, Brad Edwards, and I are pursuing. The narrow
issue before the court was whether prosecutors and defense attorneys could assert some sort of
“privilege” to prevent crime victims from reviewing the correspondence that lead to a plea
bargain. More broadly, the ruling means that the victims will have a chance to return to the
district court and seek to invalidate a plea agreement that (we alleged) was consummated in
violation of their rights. I hope that the case will ultimately set an important precedent that
federal prosecutors can’t keep victims in the dark about the plea deals that they reach.
Here are the important facts, taken from the 11th Circuit's opinion: The case arose in 2006, the
FBI began investigating allegations that wealthy investor Jeffrey Epstein had sexually abused
dozens and dozens of minor girls. The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida
accepted Epstein’s case for prosecution, and the FBI issued victim notification letters to my two
clients, minors Jane Doe No. | and Jane Doe No. 2, in June and August 2007. Extensive plea
negotiations ensued between the prosecutors and Epstein. On Sept. 24, 2007, the prosecutors
entered into a non-prosecution agreement with Epstein in which they agreed not to file any
federal charges against Epstein in exchange for his guilty plea to minor Florida offenses (e.g.,
solicitation of prostitution). Not only did the prosecutors neglect to confer with the victims
before they entered into the agreement with Epstein, they also concealed its existence for at least
nine months. For example, the prosecutors sent post-agreement letters to the victims reporting
that the “case is currently under investigation” and explaining that “[t]his can be a lengthy
process and we request your continued patience while we conduct a thorough investigation.”
On June 27, 2008, the prosecutors informed my co-counse!, Brad Edwards, that Epstein planned
to plead guilty to the Florida charges three days later. But the prosecutors failed to disclose that
Epstein’s pleas to those state charges arose from his federal non-prosecution agreement and that
the pleas would bar a federal prosecution. As a result, the victims did not attend the state court
proceedings.
45
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011956
Extracted Information
Dates
Document Details
| Filename | HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011956.jpg |
| File Size | 0.0 KB |
| OCR Confidence | 85.0% |
| Has Readable Text | Yes |
| Text Length | 2,707 characters |
| Indexed | 2026-02-04T16:15:25.426400 |