Back to Results

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012041.jpg

Source: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT  •  Size: 0.0 KB  •  OCR Confidence: 85.0%
View Original Image

Extracted Text (OCR)

Cc: #L&W BD PR (US); Wine, Jamie (NY); Bruno, Nicole (NY); Harris, Nicole (CH); Greenberg, Jeffrey (LA-NY); Bauer, Steve (SF-BR); Moore, Wendy (OC); Jennings, Alex (LA); Robins, Greg (LA) Subject: RE: Press: LA Times - Federal jury decides Middle East bank did not defraud Orange County entrepreneur OC Business Journal article with a nice shout out to Dean: http://www.ocbj.com/news/2016/aug/12/jury-decides-against-sjc-firm/ Date: Thursday, Aug 11, 2016, 7:41 PM To: Dunlavey, Dean (C) <i Schecter, Danicl (CC) <>, \iohcbbi, Ni >, Ruemmler, Kathy (DC) < >> Cc: #L&W BD PR (US) << mailto:# >, Wine, Jamie VY) <>, Beno, Nicole (NY) a >>, Harris, Nicole (CH) Ne | oo sti waa E>, Bauer, Steve (SF-BR) <>. M0072, Wendy (OC) a >, Jennings, Alex (LA) < >, Robins, Greg (LA) a Subject: Press: LA Times - Federal jury decides Middle East bank did not defraud Orange County entrepreneur The LA Times appears to be the first media to report on the verdict. Latham references are highlighted: BUSINESS Federal jury decides Middle East bank did not defraud Orange County entrepreneur<http://fw.to/aXv1QHI> [Farooq Bajwa] Farooq Bajwa By Andrew Khouri August 11, 2016 A federal jury decided Thursday that one of the Middle East’s most prominent banks did not commit fraud and steal technology from an Irvine firm that sued it for half a billion dollars in damages after their partnership collapsed. Orange County company InfoSpan had alleged that Emirates NBD ended a partnership for a mobile payment system because it didn’t want to share revenue and stole InfoSpan’s technology to launch its own service. The Dubai-based bank, in turn, denied it stole or ever used InfoSpan’s technology. It argued that it cancelled the partnership because InfoSpan couldn’t produce a working product and misled it into thinking it was an established company, not one with little to no track record. After deliberating for a day, the jury unanimously decided that InfoSpan did not prove its case of fraud and theft of trade secrets. InfoSpan had asked for $540 million in damages. An attorney for InfoSpan declined to comment on the HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012041

Document Preview

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012041.jpg

Click to view full size

Extracted Information

Dates

Document Details

Filename HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012041.jpg
File Size 0.0 KB
OCR Confidence 85.0%
Has Readable Text Yes
Text Length 2,150 characters
Indexed 2026-02-04T16:15:37.195041