HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012641.jpg

COUNT fi Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress 21. Plaintiffs Jane Doe by and through her Father, as parent and natural guardian, Jane Doe’s Father and Jane Doe’s Stepmother, individually, repeat and reallege paragraphs 1 through 16 above, ) 22. Epstein’s conduct was intentional or reckless. 23. Epstein's conduct was outrageous, going beyond all bounds of decency. 24. —_ Epstein’s conduct caused severe emotional distress not only to Jane Doe, but also to her parents, Jane Doe’s Father and Jane Doe’s Stepmother. Epstein knew or had reason to know that his intentional and outrageous conduct would cause emotional trauma and damage to Jane Doe’s parents. 25. Asa direct and proximate result of Epstein’s intentional or reckless conduct, Jane Doe, Jane Does’ Father and Jane Doe’s Stepmother have suffered and will continue to suffer severe mental anguish and pain. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs Jane Doe by and through her Father, as parent and natural guardian, Jane Doe’s Father and Jane Doe’s Stepmother demand judgment against Defendant J effrey Epstein for compensatory damages, costs, punitive damages, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper. - COUNT It Loss of Parental Consortium 26. Plaintiff Jane Doe’s Father repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 16 above. 27. Epstein’s tortious conduct is the direct and proximate cause of damages to Jane Doe’s Father, consisting of parental loss of comfort, companionship and society and healthcare costs HERMAN & MERMELSTEN, P. A. www.hermaniaw.com HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012641