HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013465.jpg

ie ‘on vthe tape were not.“sources” in the tradition’ sense of the ‘word:= all individuals were simply’ chatting: cece ea" with. ‘Mr. Rush about: Mr. Epstein’ and. his. propensity to molest. children: For example,’ when. discussed 2 : M, RASH tell me that: | was a “source” ” for’ his reporting. 18. While research by other plaintiffs’. ‘attorneys and myself has uncovered. other persons "that. were acquaintances of Mr. Epstein, specifically: Donald Trump, Alan Dershowitz, Bill Clinton, Tommy Mottola, and David Copperfield; we have. no information that any of those people (other than. . Mr- Dershowitz) have spoken to Mr. Epstein about Jane Doe or.any of the other specific victims of Mr. '- .Epstein’s molestation. Mr. Dershowitz ‘is acting as an attorney for Mr. Epstein, and therefore it is. : a presumably unlikely to question him about any admissions. that Epstein may have made regarding Jane * Doe or. other minors girls: Additionally, we have no information that any of those individuals or any other individuals have any taped statements of: Epstein’ s own voice relating to these matters.. George Rush’s taped conversation with Mr..Epstein is the only. known, one.in existence, making it very unique oe 4 and it contains information not otherwise. obtainable through other means or sources. Indeed, without ‘ the Rush tape conversation, the jury that handles the case will not hear any words from Epstein himself - about his abuse of Jane Doe and other young girls. | have been. informed by Epstein’s attorney that : .. Epstein intends to invoke his Fifth Amendment rights rather than answer any substantive f questions : ” about the abuse’ of Jane Doe and other girls at trial. faa 49, The Rush interview is, in any event, unique and. ‘not otherwise ebiainable from other ) witnesses because it can be used.to prove perjury (a federal crime) on the part of Epstein: Epstein lied. ‘about not: knowing: George Rush. See deposition of Jeffrey Epstein, taken in. Jeffrey Epstein, case ~ 50-2008-CA~ 028051,° ‘page-154, line 4 through. 155 line 9, wherein Jeffrey Epstein clearly i impresses that he does not recognize George ‘Rush from the New York Daily News, despite the fact that he gave a . i * personal interview that we all now know to have been tape recorded. It is therefore evidence of a ew, alee | criminal event. If we receive the tape, we intend to alert’ the appropriate law enforcement authorities, , : : [ "both federal and state, sO that they can pursue any. appropriate criminal investigation perjury charges. 4 7 20. The tape is.also crucial rofl to dismiss the frivolous complaint filed by Jeffrey Epstein. against her, as he clearly acknowledges knowing il contrary to claims. he makes in his complaint . ae | against her and also contradictory to other statements he has made: in depositions related to knowing -. i etl that regard, this tape provides evidence of other false statements Epstein has’ made under oath, ony 21. -During a télephone call with George Rush, he provided me more than a description of ie tape, and in fact described the general tenor of the entire interview, so that t nothing i in the interview can be fairly regarded as confidential at this point. : : ae (225 at As George Rush. admitted in: his affidavit, he played the. tape for at lege two. other : - persons who also, confirmed Epstein’ s arrogance as he speaks about his actions with minors. ls WBE ‘The people: for: whom. George Rush: played: the. tape or told in detail of the information’ a - ‘the tape with. Mr. Rush, a was nota‘ “source” -in the” traditional s sense. of that Tenn. AL no 1 point ¢ did. Mre oe ry * senate a 24 7 Because Epstein and ali other co- conspirators | fives invoked the sig amendment as. sto all relevant’ ‘questions, . this tape: is the only: way that Jane Doe can: ‘put Epstein’ sown perceptions of what - a he has. done‘before the j jury and the only way that Jane. Doe can. put Epstein’ s.admissions and statement te Mert ammnetatmt op ef, og ‘before, the jury.. As even’ a ‘quick: perusal of. the 1 more. ‘than 500 entries on ihe docket sheét for’ Jane aan + r : “4 Doe’ s (consolidated) case will confirm (see-Case no. 9:08- 30119 (S.D: Fla. ): (case number. for consolidated ee Rogen : . cases on discovery), Jane Doe.and other. plaintiffs have made exhaustive attempts to, obtain information ih from Epstein about his abuse: These attempts have included repeated requests for admission, requests ee A; “for production, interrogatories, ‘and. depositions - ~ all the means that are listed. in the Federal Rules‘of 2 4 Civil Peaceciice for obtaining discovery. These means have all’ been exhausted without s success. Neither ee | HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013465