EFTA02410875.pdf

To: jeevacation@gmail.com[jeevacation@gmail.com] From: Steve Hanson Sent: Fri 7/2/2010 9:41:39 PM Subject: Fw: Non-Farm Payroll Employment - Much weaker than headlines suggest Title: Message Didn't want to bother u today But see below Employment pick up in HOSPITALITY areas Always first area to start off As EASY to go out spend some $ if your feeling good I think we might to start to move forward- nothing quick. My June $ where about 8% above last year + last June it was starling to not be as bad a downfall as prior 09 mos Talk in am if ur free Sent from Steve Hanson's Blackberry Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail transmission and any file or previous e-mail attached to it is intended to be viewed only by the party to which it is addressed and may contain valuable business information that is confidential and/or otherwise protected from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, dissemination or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Thank you for your cooperation. From: Mark Fisher To: Steve Hanson; Stephanie Herz < ; Sam Haber Sent: Fri Jul 02 09:17:38 2010 Subject: FW: Non-Farm Payroll Employment - Much weaker than headlines suggest From: GS Global ECS US Research [mailto:us@irecInpOlsq.ln.eq.gs.corn] Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 9:16 AM Subject: USA: Non-Farm Payroll Employment - Much weaker than headlines suggest USA: Non-Farm Payroll Employment - Much weaker than headlines suggest Actual: -125,000 mom Previous: 433.000 mom EFTA_R1_01471920 EFTA02410875 CoConsensus: -130,000 ns Released: Friday, July 02, 2010 at 08:30 (New York time) en susMuch weaker than headlines suggest : - BOTTOM LINE: The headlines of the June employment report were decent - a rise in private sector 13 employment by 83,000 and a drop in the unemployment rate from 9.7% to 9.5% - but the "guts" were much 0,thveaker as household employment declined sharply and both the workweek and average hourly earnings 00 declined. The report confirms that the labor market has not yet reached the self-sustaining recovery stage. at a Re time when forward-looking indicators of economic activity are slackening. We have judgmentally downgraded leathe US-MAP rating to -2 from the 0 suggested by the inline "headline" payrolls reading because of the much se weaker guts of this report. d: < BR>LIS-MAP: FriNonfann Payrolls -10 (5, -2). da y, KEY NUMBERS: JulNonfarm payrolls -125k in June vs. GS -100k. median forecast -130k. y Private payrolls +83k in June vs. GS +150k, median forecast +110k. 02,Uncmploymcnt rate 9.5% in June vs. GS and median forecast 9.8%. 20 Average hourly earnings -0.1% in June (mom, +1.7% yoy) vs. GS and median forecast +0.1%. 10 at MAIN POINTS: 08 I. Nonfarm payrolls fell 125.000. more than accounted for by a 225,000 drop in Census employment. :3 Elsewhere, the private sector added 83,000 jobs and non-Census government employers 17,000. These 0 numbers are fairly close to consensus expectations, especially once we take into account a cumulative net (N upward revision of 25,000 to total payrolls in May. There is some evidence that private sector hiring benefited ew from the unwind of a Census "displacement" effect in May. both in the pickup in overall private employment Yogrowth (83k vs. 33k in May) and in the sectoral distribution of gains, with a sha rp rebound in leisure and rk hospitality employment (+37k after -7k in May). The establishment survey benefited from a birth-death ti adjustment of +147k, 14k more than in June 2009. me ) 2. Other aspects of the establishment survey were considerably weaker. The payroll diffusion fell to 52.2 in the nonfarm business sector, from 54.8 in May and a recent high of 68.0 in April. The workweek dropped 0.1 M hours to 34.1, with almost all of this drop due to a sharp 0.5-hour drop in manufacturing. Moreover, average ix hourly earnings fell 0.1%, on top of a downward revision to the prior month. Average hourly earnings now h stand at just+ 1.7% year-on-year, a new cycle low. Hence, the implications for private-sector income wegeneration as well as inflation are negative. ak cr 3. The household survey was very weak as well. The drop in the unemployment rate was entirely due to a huge th 652k drop in the labor force, undoubtedly partly due to the dropout of Census workers from the labor force. an Only sonic of these workers seem to have gone into the "pool of available workers" as broader measures of he underemployment were mostly down as well. However. the Census cannot explain the fact that the ad employment/population ratio fell back to 58.5% in June from a peak of 58.8% in April (when the level of lin Census workers was lower than in June). es su For more information, contact GS t S Economics Research gg Jan Hatzius est Ed McKelvey B Andrew Tilton O Sven Jail Stehn TT 0 M LI Th We have a blackberry friendly version of this email - If you would like to receive the blackberry friendly version please email EFTA_R1_01471921 EFTA02410876 Fo For Goldman Sachs economic data and forecasts please visit ERWIN on Goldman 360. r GoWe, Andrew Tilton, Edward F. McKelvey, Jan Hatzius and Sven Jari Stehn, hereby certify that all of Id the views expressed in this report accurately reflect personal views, which have not been influenced maby considerations of the firm's business or client relationships. Sa ch Please consider the environment before you print this email or any attachments cc chanc.i.: your details or to ant,tabNcribc. entail GS Global ECS Research on om si )isclosures applicable to research with respect to issuers, if any, mentioned herein, are dot vailable through your Goldman Sachs representative or at a http://www.gs.comircsearch/hedge.html an d for ec ast plc ase vis it ER WI N on Go Id ma n 36 0. W e, An dr ew Til to n, Ed wa rd F. M cK el ve Y. Ja n EFTA_R1_01471922 EFTA02410877 Ha tzi us an d Sv en Ja ri St eh n, he re by ce rtif Y th at all of th e vi ew s ex pr es se d in thi s re Po rt ac cu rat el Y ref le ct pe rs on al vi ew s, wh is h EFTA_R1_01471923 EFTA02410878 ha ve no t be en inf lu en ce d by co nsi de rat io ns of th e fir m' s bu sin es s or cli en t rel ati on shi ps PI ea se co ns id er th e en vir on m en t be EFTA_R1_01471924 EFTA02410879 fo re yo U pr int thi e m ail or an y att ac h m en is Is or ra Un Sn bs cri be G S GI 2.12 al C I K EFTA_R1_01471925 EFTA02410880 Di scl tit of plc Ca C 10 re Sc ar Cft ui sp CC to iss IS, -an V ill CI) fit) nc htt- rel at EFTA_R1_01471926 EFTA02410881