EFTA02428040.pdf
Extracted Text (OCR)
To:
jeevacation@gmail.com 'eevacation©gmail.com]
From:
petermandelso
Sent:
Tue 3/30/2010 8:08:15 PM
Subject: Fw:
Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device
From: Jcs Staley
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:26:24 -0400
To: Peter Mandelson
Subject:
Peter, What follows are some brief speaking points that we would use in discussing the Volcker plan
with Summers. We can speak to them when we talk tonight.
The Federal government's guarantee of bank deposits enhances consumer confidence in our financial
system.
Although deposits play a lesser role as a funding source following decades of bank disintermediation, it
is sensible for government (as any guarantor would want► to seek limits on how funds sourced from
their guaranteed deposits are exposed to risk.
Well-managed US banks with prudent controls to protect client interests, including depositors', already
do this respecting the intent of existing affiliate restrictions and with internal procedures separating
proprietary and fiduciary activities.
Updating regulation to the reality of global modern markets should not disadvantage U S institutions or
create structural conflicts in relation to their Asian or European counterparts.
Fiduciary: Asset Management
Regulations that protect client investments from other banking activities have proven successful during
recent financial crises.
EFTA_R1_01497372
EFTA02428040
Commercial Banks have been managing client assets for over 100 years and this fiduciary role has
withstood both time and evolutionary change in client demand from traditional to alternative
investment products.
Asset Management is a profitable business entirely suited to fiduciary bank ownership with limited
capital needs and no risk weighted assets. Practically, there is no difference between sponsorship of
hedge and private equity funds and traditional products like mutual and money funds.
Bank owned asset managers should not be allowed to combine proprietary resources with fiduciary
money in hedge funds, private equity or traditional investment vehicles.
Prohibiting bank ownership of asset managers is unnecessary and eliminates a source of prudent
diversification for client holdings and long-term profit stability for regulated firms.
Proprietary: Risk Management and Discretionary Trading
Proprietary trading is a natural outgrowth of the market-making role and it is difficult to separate these
activities.
Proprietary trading supports management of interest rate risk, creating greater lending flexibility; it also
plays a vital role for banks akin to the research and development arm of a corporation.
Prop Desks should be tightly regulated, scaled correctly, and subject to sizeable capital requirements
applied consistently across all systemically relevant firms.
We are concerned that hedging trades can be misconstrued through legislation as proprietary because
they escape simple definition and lack precise conformity to unique client exposures.
Client transactions frequently require long duration hedges or hedges that can only approximate
underlying positions. This is highly complex and best left to the regulators to oversee. A static
legislative definition of proprietary trading can impair meaningfully a bank's ability to manage risk.
EFTA_R1_01497373
EFTA02428041
If the Volcker Rule had been in place during the financial crisis, it would not have prevented the bank
failures that occurred.
les Staley Chief Executive Officerl Investment Bank 17.P. Morgan 1270 Park Avenue, 47th Floor I T:
EFTA_R1_01497374
EFTA02428042
Document Preview
Document Details
| Filename | EFTA02428040.pdf |
| File Size | 182.6 KB |
| OCR Confidence | 85.0% |
| Has Readable Text | Yes |
| Text Length | 3,580 characters |
| Indexed | 2026-02-12T16:46:51.456519 |
Related Documents
Documents connected by shared names, same document type, or nearby in the archive.