EFTA02434540.pdf
Extracted Text (OCR)
To:
Jeffrey Epsteinfleevacation©gmail.com]
From:
roger schank
Sent:
Sun 11/1/2009 12:45:56 PM
Subject: Re: you wanted positive?
aha
roger schank
http://www.rogerschank.com/
On Nov I, 2009, at 7:45 AM, Jeffrey Epstein wrote:
lets think about a lisopitality curriculum for next week
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 7:10 AM, roger schank
wrote:
An Imagined First Year in College
I want to make a suggestion that university faculty could
adopt.
Simply divide the four years that comprise college into two and
two. Make the first two the teaching of the 16 processes
and the last two the study of the subjects that the faculty
so dearly love. Introduction to X, which no dominates the
first two years of college for most students, would be
abandoned. The faculty hate teaching it anyway and the
students hate taking it. (The administration loves those
courses though, as I will explain later on.)
How would this work? Let' s first consider the set of processes
grouped under conscious processes:
EFTA_R1_01506231
EFTA02434540
Conscious Processes
Prediction is an area of life that is worth getting good at doing.
Who, in the various faculties, organize their daily lives
around predictions? Economists make predictions. It is
what they do all the time. Medical doctors make
predictions. Physicists make predictions. Political scientists
make predictions. Let' s imagine that students were
taught by a team of people from these four areas who
were the exactly those people who specialized in making
predictions all the time in their careers. And, let' s
suppose that they created a year long course in how to
make predictions based on known evidence, past cases,
and pushing the boundaries of what is known. Wouldn' t
this be a better course than Introduction to Physics?The
teachers could introduce whatever aspects of physics they
wanted to help students understand the predictive
process in that area, but other faculty who did prediction
in other areas would be part of the discussion. There
would be a set of interesting issues ranging from
predictions that were thought to be right but weren' t to
predicting one' s that are being made today in each area.
The idea would be that the content is the predictive
process itself not the traditional subject matter. Statistics
(and other useful tools) would be taught in this context
while the predictive process was being studied.
Judgment
EFTA_R1_01506232
EFTA02434541
Law is not typically part of any college curriculum because law
schools are recent inventions on college campuses (that is
they are from the last century and not the century before)
so they never got to be part of the college set of courses
despite the fact that so many students want to be lawyers.
Judges make judgments all the time and those lawyers
who teach judges to make judgment should be teaching
freshman to make judgments as well. Of course, artists
and musicians and literary critics make judgments of a
different sort, as do philosophers and business people. All
of the people could be teaching a course together on how
to make judgments fairly and how to determine what is
fair. This is where ethics and morality come into play as
well.
Modeling
Who build models? Psychologists think about models of the
mind, as do Computer Scientists and Philosophers who
specialize in thinking about thinking. Architects and
Economists build models of a different sort. Engineers
work with models regularly. All of these people use
different modeling tools but they work on the same
thing: trying to figure out how something works by
building it and seeing if they can replicate it. They may
be using a computer or building blocks or electricity or
art. It makes no difference. It is all an attempt to see
how things work by building some facsimile. This is an
important idea in human thinking and a course should
EFTA_R1_01506233
EFTA02434542
be taught to undergraduates on how to do it by the
people who actually do it, teaching different techniques
as they go. They are many ways to build a model and
students in college should know the possibilities before
they take on further study.
Experimentation
Psychologists do experiments. Chemists do experiments.
Physicists do experiments. Medical researchers do
experiments. (The drug companies are constantly doing
experiments that affect us all.) Why is there no course
in learning how to do an experiment? Shouldn' t
students be learning how to come up with a hypothesis
and how to test that hypothesis? Isn' t that more
important as a fundamental building block of the mind
than any course offered to freshman in college today?
5. Describing
Literature departments are all about describing. So are drama
departments, communication departments, philosophy
departments, and art departments. And, to be clear, so are
all science departments. All of these departments have
people within them who are worried about how to say
what you want to say and how to effectively communicate
EFTA_R1_01506234
EFTA02434543
to others. They criticize people who are bad at description
on a regular basis. Students need to need to learn to write
but they also need to learn to talk and to use alternative
media to make their points and to explain what they have
done. A coherent course of study in how to describe
properly is easily within the ability of any college faculty
and ought to be is highest priority, taught from any
different points of view, teaching what description is
about not how to work PowerPoint.
Managing
Business people study management. Business courses have
made their way into many college campuses but the Ivy
League colleges are still hold-outs. Business is looked
down upon as a non-academic subject. Political scientists
study how governments are managed. Historians study
how governments, battles, cities, and a range of other
things have been managed. Architects and Urban Planners
and Engineers worry about management. All of these
people could combine to teach students how to manage
others (as well as themselves.) This is very important part
of functioning in any society.
First College Year Summary
It would be my contention that a freshman year made up of
these six processes, taught in six simultaneous courses
that were designed to relate to each other in various
EFTA_R1_01506235
EFTA02434544
ways and at specific times, would be a wonderful thing
for teaching people how to think. The best of our faculty
can teach what they think about to students who are now
ready to start to thinking rigorously. By the end of this
first year, students could begin to specialize, not in
academic subjects just yet, but in other processes that
build on the conscious processes.
roger schank
http://www.rogerschank.com/
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by c-mail to jeo. acationth gmail.corn, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments.
EFTA_R1_01506236
EFTA02434545
Document Preview
Document Details
| Filename | EFTA02434540.pdf |
| File Size | 615.9 KB |
| OCR Confidence | 85.0% |
| Has Readable Text | Yes |
| Text Length | 7,444 characters |
| Indexed | 2026-02-12T16:58:55.696031 |
Related Documents
Documents connected by shared names, same document type, or nearby in the archive.