EFTA02468676.pdf

From: jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, March 18, 2016 8:25 PM To: Erika Kellerhals Subject: Re: Great St. James hes nuts, <=iv class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Erika Kellerhals=<Cell Notice: This communicat=on may contain privileged or other confidential information. If you =re not the intended recipient, or believe that you have received this comm=nication in error, please do not print, copy, re-transmit, disseminate, or=otherwise use this information. Also, please indicate to the sender =hat you have received this e-mail in error, and delete the copy you receiv=d. Thank you. Circular 230: To ensure c=mpliance with the requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any =ax advice contained in our communication (including any attachments) was n=t intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (=) avoiding any tax penalty or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to=another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. Forwarded messa e F=om: Ryan Wisehart <= Date: Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 3:43 PM Subje=t: Fwd: Great St. James To: Erika Kellerhals C=: Richard Kahn <r Erika, For your convenience I'm attaching the origi=al proposal and budget documents provided to Daphne, then forwarded by her=to Rich. The following narrative should help fill-in the gaps which I prob=bly didn't communicated well via the proposal. <=r>Our Scope-of-Work as conceived includes Road Design and Development and =opographic Surveying, as follows: 1. Develop conceptual road la=out plan (Delivered). The purpose of this exercise is to determin= feasible and preferable routes for accessing the island promontories. The=owner desires gentler routes than those developed on Little St. James. Wit= that in mind we used existing aerial terrain mapping to develop routes th=t should have gradients EFTA_R1_01578499 EFTA02468676 of about 10% or less. Routes were also determined =hat will facilitate future water and helicopter points of access. At th=s point I need the owner's feedback before proceeding to a more detail=d engineering plan. Does the owner want more or fewer roads, access to=other locations, etc? We'll incorporate owner feedback into a revised =oncept and proceed to developing permit plans. 2. Prepare plans fo= permitting including earth-change and erosion/sedimentation control.=C2*Upon owner approval of the conceptual road layout plan we will develo= specific plans for supporting permit applications with CZM. These plans w=ll include specifications for the roadways including typical road section =road foundation), existing and proposed road profile elevations (grades), =rosion and sedimentation controls and best practices. 3. Field sta=ing of roadways and erosion control measures. Field staking of th= roadways will provide accurate assessment of routes through actual, direc= ground measurement. Adjustments in road locations will be made at this ti=e to avoid terrain that is too steep, highly erodible, and to facilitate p=eservation of desirable natural features (i.e. rock formations, special tr=es, etc.) The staking will also allow investigations by Bioimpact. 4. Topographic surveys of various areas including the existing main house =nd new dock area. Basically, general on-call services as request=d. There was previously mention of surveying the main house area but I'=m not aware if this is needed or not. Also, Amy mentioned needing an as-bu=lt survey of the dock. I'm not sure if the information we presently ha=e for the dock is sufficient for her purposes. Moving forwar= it is advisable that we have a coordination meeting with Amy and any othe= persons working on the project (is there an archeologist on board, archit=ct, etc.?) Also, who will be preparing the actual permit application and a=pearing for public hearings, if any are needed? F=nally, please let me know if Mr. Epstein has comments about the road conce=t and if we should proceed with developing permit plans. =div dir="ltr"> Sincerely, Ryan C. Wise=art, PLS President BRIAN MOSEL=Y & ASSOCIATES, INC. Forwarded message F=om: Ryan Wisehart c=a href=" Date: Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 11:26 AM Subje=t: Great St. James To: Daphne Wallace Cc: Erika Kell=rhals Good morning Daphn=, Attached is our proposal, budget, and hourly rates. P=ease sign and return the proposal indicating acceptance and I will forward=an invoice for mobilization. Please be sure to give me a call with any que=tions. Sincerel=, 2 EFTA_R1_01578500 EFTA02468677 Ryan C. Wisehart, PLS President BRIAN MOSELEY & ASSOCIATES, INC. 4003 Ra shune Hill Road =uite #606 St. Thomas VI 00802 please =ote The information contained in this communication is confiden=ial, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside informati=n, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the propert= of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communica=ion or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If =ou have received this communication in error, please notify us immediat=ly by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmailcom <mailto:jeevacation@gmail=com> , and destroy this comm=nication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -=11 rights reserved 3 EFTA_R1_01578501 EFTA02468678