Back to Results

DOJ-OGR-00004891.jpg

Source: IMAGES  •  Size: 708.4 KB  •  OCR Confidence: 94.3%
View Original Image

Extracted Text (OCR)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 310-1 Filed 07/02/21 Page 79 of 80 constitutional right, was compelled to participate in a civil case after losing that right, testified against his own interests, weakened his position there and ultimately settled the case for a large sum of money, was tried twice in criminal court, was convicted, and has served several years in prison. All of this started with D.A. Castor’s compulsion of Cosby’s reliance upon a public proclamation that Cosby would not be prosecuted. The CDO’s remedy for all of this would include subjecting Cosby to a third criminal trial. That is no remedy at all. Rather, it is an approach that would place Cosby nowhere near where he was before the due process violation took root. There is only one remedy that can completely restore Cosby to the status quo ante. He must be discharged, and any future prosecution on these particular charges must be barred. We do not dispute that this remedy is both severe and rare. But it is warranted here, indeed compelled. The CDO would shun this remedy because (at least in part) it might thwart the “public interest in having the guilty brought to book.”*4 It cannot be gainsaid that society holds a strong interest in the prosecution of crimes. It is also true that no such interest, however important, ever can eclipse society’s interest in ensuring that the constitutional rights of the people are vindicated. Society’s interest in prosecution does not displace the remedy due to constitutionally aggrieved persons. IV. Conclusion We do not question the discretion that is vested in prosecutors “over whether charges should be brought in any given case.” Stipetich, 652 A.2d at 1295. We will not undermine a prosecutor’s “general and widely recognized power to conduct criminal litigation and prosecutions on behalf of the Commonwealth, and to decide whether and when to prosecute, and whether and when to continue or discontinue a case.” /d. (quoting ok See CDO (quoting Blue, 384 U.S. at 255). [J-100-2020] - 78 DOJ-OGR-00004891

Document Preview

DOJ-OGR-00004891.jpg

Click to view full size

Extracted Information

Dates

Phone Numbers

Document Details

Filename DOJ-OGR-00004891.jpg
File Size 708.4 KB
OCR Confidence 94.3%
Has Readable Text Yes
Text Length 2,042 characters
Indexed 2026-02-03 16:54:14.387135