Back to Results

DOJ-OGR-00004998.jpg

Source: IMAGES  •  Size: 1040.7 KB  •  OCR Confidence: 93.6%
View Original Image

Extracted Text (OCR)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 321 Filed 08/19/21 Page 1 of 3 LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIA\ 212-243-1100 * Main 225 Broadway, Suite 715 917-912-9698 * Cell sina New York, NY 10007 ELECTRONICALLY FILED || 888-587-4737 ° Fax besternhein@mac.com DOC #: war ata SOTO DATE FILED: °/47/4t August 18, 2021 Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Judge : United States Courthouse dis 40 Foley Square ‘ New York, NY 10007 SO ORDERED. ALISON J. NATHAN, U.S.DJ. The Government is hereby ORDERED to confer with BOP and MDC Legal and file a response to Defendant's letter on or before August 23, 2021. SO ORDERED. 8/19/21 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan; I write to update the Court regarding MDC ongoing interference with attorney-client communication between Ghislaine Maxwell and her counsel. Since December 2019, video teleconferences (“VTCs”) between Ms. Maxwell and her counsel have been conducted via defense counsel’s WebEx platform. There were no problems with VTCs with the exception of when the MDC placed the VTC monitor inside a box with a screen, which severely impacted Ms. Maxwell’s ability to see counsel and documents shown to her. That issue, which arose on June 14, 2021, was resolved between defense counsel and the MDC. However, on August 6, 2021, MDC Legal sent counsel an email stating that starting Monday (August 9"") we could no longer use defense counsel’s WebEx platform for the VTCs, and instead had to use any of four Zoom access codes provided by the MDC. When questioned why the platform was being changed from WebEx to Zoom, MDC Legal stated the VTC platform was changed due to complaints made by Ms. Maxwell. Upon information and belief, the complaints concerned visual evidence that someone on MDC’s end of the WebEx connection, other than Ms. Maxwell, appeared on the screen as a VTC participant called “NER/BRO,” adjusted the volume during the VTC, and moved the viewing box used to view documents on the screen. During the past several weeks, interruption in Ms. Maxwell’s VTC signal and bandwidth suggested that her connection was split, causing her VTC sessions to go in and out, and her screen often turned green and became blurry. No other participants experienced such disruption. When Ms. Maxwell raised these concerns to various staff members, no one seemed surprised. The fact that MDC immediately provided a “more secure” link (in their words) suggests there was some type of breach or interference with the attorney-client VTC which impinged upon confidentiality of privileged attorney-client communication and is placing an on-going chill on communication between Ms. Maxwell and her defense team. It is my understanding that the new MDC Zoom platform does not preclude third parties who have the access information to the Zoom “Courtrooms” from interfering (inadvertently or intentionally) with Ms. Maxwell’s privileged communication. That concern manifested itself on August 12 when DOJ-OGR- 00004998

Document Preview

DOJ-OGR-00004998.jpg

Click to view full size

Document Details

Filename DOJ-OGR-00004998.jpg
File Size 1040.7 KB
OCR Confidence 93.6%
Has Readable Text Yes
Text Length 3,023 characters
Indexed 2026-02-03 16:55:28.099736