Back to Results

EFTA02502891.pdf

Source: DOJ_DS11  •  Size: 156.8 KB  •  OCR Confidence: 85.0%
PDF Source (No Download)

Extracted Text (OCR)

From: jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 7:39 PM To: Daphne Wallace Subject: Re: R.O. & Generator Bldg. Revisions page 9 elevaion is wrong shoudl extend past te= wall O= Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Daphne Wallace < wrote: Gree=ings Sir, Revisions from John for your review and comme=ts. Respectfully, Daphne Forwarded message From: John P. Woods, AIA < Date: Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 2:03 PM Subject: R=O. & Generator Bldg. Revisions To: Daphne Wallace < <mailto », ann rodriquez < Daphne, 4>=A0 > > Attached are the revised drawings for =he R.O. & Generator Building Roofing project. These changes are based =pon comments from Mr. Epstein at a recent site visit on Friday, April 17, =015. In summary, the changes requested are as follows: 1. =C2* The longer building (R.O. Bldg.) will be expand=d to a width of 60 feet. There will be roll up doors on both of the short =nds. The two long sides will have no openings. The exterior sheathing shal= be a typical metal siding provided by the steel building manufacturer. Th= eave height of the building shall be reduced to 12 feet to minimize the h=ight of the structure. This will also result in the roll up door height be=ng reduced to 10 feet. 2. 4>=A0 The shorter building (Generator Bldg.) will have e=terior sheathing that is the typical metal siding provided by the steel bu=lding manufacturer. The height will be increased to 20 feet to accommodate=a roll up door 16 feet in height. This is the minimum height established b= the LSJ maintenance staff to accommodate the roll on roll off activities =f the dumpsters. qu> EFTA_R1_01631419 EFTA02502891 I would like to add some observations regard=ng the change in heights of the two buildings. For one, it doesn't=make sense to minimize the height of one building while the other must be = full 8 feet higher. The Generator building now looks out of proportion wi=h that extra height. What may be more appropriate in my opinion is to cons=der not roofing where the dumpsters will be located and extend the parapet=wall up another 3 — 4 feet to be almost 9 feet above the roof slab= This will do a lot to visually screen the dumpsters. You should also cons=der replacing the dumpsters with enclosed units that have compactors incor=orated into them. Some of these type of dumpsters are presently being used=in very visible sites on St. Thomas, particularly at WICO. Finally, = have also included the revised floor plan for the Maintenance & Works=op Building, eliminating the Break Room. JPW =/div> <http://www.avast.com/> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus <http://w=w.avast.comh protection is active. please =ote The information contained in this communication is confiden=ial, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside informati=n, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the propert= of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communica=ion or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If =ou have received this communication in error, please notify us immediat=ly by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacation@gmail=com> , and destroy this comm=nication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -=11 rights reserved 2 EFTA_R1_01631420 EFTA02502892

Document Preview

PDF source document
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.

Document Details

Filename EFTA02502891.pdf
File Size 156.8 KB
OCR Confidence 85.0%
Has Readable Text Yes
Text Length 3,399 characters
Indexed 2026-02-12T18:25:24.020124
Ask the Files