Back to Results

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019294.jpg

Source: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT  •  Size: 0.0 KB  •  OCR Confidence: 85.0%
View Original Image

Extracted Text (OCR)

BREAKING DOWN DEMOCRACY: Goals, Strategies, and Methods of Modern Authoritarians continue their investigation of these techniques and experiment with ways to combat them. We also urge more intense coverage of Beijing's efforts to undermine democratic norms in neighboring states or territories, as in Hong Kong and Taiwan, and its largely successful attempts to pressure other govern- ments into repatriating citizens who had fled persecu- tion in China. Lastly, the media are not doing their job if they neglect to give aggressive coverage to the lobbyists and pub- lic-relations specialists who make money by repre- senting dictators and kleptocrats. Those who flack for the leaders of China, Azerbaijan, Egypt, and their ilk should be made to answer for each political prisoner, murdered opposition figure, shuttered newspaper, and offshore account full of stolen funds that can be tied to their authoritarian clients. To the academic community: We urge academic associations, individual scholars, and university administrations to stand up for freedom of thought and open inquiry at a time when those values are under relentless pressure from dictatorships. We urge statements of protest against the persecution of fellow scholars or the politicized rewriting of history, especially in countries, like Russia and China, that are integrated into the international university system. We urge universities to reject the establishment of projects and study departments—whether at home or overseas—that do not adhere to the highest stan- dards of intellectual freedom or that restrict discus- sion of certain subjects. To the business community: We urge private busi- nesses to avoid commercial relationships with authoritarian governments that force them to violate fundamental democratic principles. Private compa- nies and investors have a clear interest in democratic public goods like the rule of law, which guarantees their property rights, and the transparency provid- ed by free media and corruption watchdogs, which ensures the accuracy of economic cata and the fair allocation of state contracts. They should therefore do what they can to prevent any further deterioration in the condition of global democracy. Some sectors are especially vulnerable to authoritarian pressure, and have a special role to play in combating it. We urge the film industry to reject involvement in joint ventures with companies that have close ties to au- thoritarian regimes and reputations for demanding po- liticized censorship of artistic content. We also urge the technology industry to refuse business arrangements that require active complicity in or passive acceptance of political censorship or information control. To the European Union: We urge the EU to undertake a comprehensive review of member states’ democrat- ic institutions to determine whether recent changes have weakened checks and balances or unduly protected incumbent parties from fair electoral com- petition. The EU should adopt measures to publicize departures from democratic standards and develop a new set of sanctions that could be imposed on noncompliant governments—whether inside, outside, or hoping to join the bloc—even in the absence of unanimity among member states. In the meantime, the EU should use the sanctions already in place, even if it means freezing a member state's participation, and be prepared to actually impose any new sanctions that might be introduced. To private foundations: We urge private foundations to recognize and oppose the current assault on democracy. With a few exceptions, the great institu- tions of American philanthropy have studiously—and shamefully—ignored the steady erosion of global free- dom and the rise of authoritarian powers. The recent developments in Europe and the United States will hopefully shake their complacency. There is a strong need for analysis, support for individual dissidents, and aid for societies under authoritarian threat, and as many democratic governments waver in their com- mitment to such priorities, it is essential for private funders to step into the breach. To mainstream political candidates: We urge re- sponsible political figures to call out colleagues or rivals when they show contempt for basic democratic ideas. Until now, politicians in the democracies have been unimpressive in their responses to opponents who embrace authoritarian figures like Putin. This is despite the overwhelming evidence of egregious crimes under Putin's rule: murdered journalists and political opposition leaders, the invasion of neighbor- ing states, brutish counterinsurgency campaigns in the North Caucasus, the emasculation of a once-vi- brant media sector, rigged elections, and much more. If they choose to shower him with praise, political leaders like Marine Le Pen, Geert Wilders, and Donald Trump should be forced to account for the realities of Putin's appalling record. The same is true for any politi- cian who praises dictators in the Middle East, Asia, or Africa. 60 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019294

Document Preview

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019294.jpg

Click to view full size

Document Details

Filename HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019294.jpg
File Size 0.0 KB
OCR Confidence 85.0%
Has Readable Text Yes
Text Length 5,057 characters
Indexed 2026-02-04T16:37:48.146984