HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019293.jpg

Freedom House 7. The rewriting of history will become more wide- spread and will greatly complicate societal ef- forts to confront both past and present political abuses. The rehabilitation of Joseph Stalin and the airbrushing of Mao Zedong’s destructive reign serve to facilitate an authoritarian form of nationalism in which strength and unity super- sede justice and freedom, and the state is exalt- ed at the expense of individual human beings. 8. Authoritarian or illiberal forces are more likely to gain supremacy in countries where the parties that represent liberal democracy do not simply lose elections, but experience a full-blown political collapse, whether through corruption, ineptitude, or failure to build lasting bonds with the public. In the end, elections do matter, and real change still requires victory at the polls. This is why robust, self-confident, and uncorrupted opposition par- ties are essential to democracy’s survival. Recommendations In studies of this kind, recommendations are primarily addressed to policymakers, particularly in the admin- istration and Congress of the United States. Given the election of Donald Trump, however, a different approach is called for. Trump has made clear again and again his admiration for Vladimir Putin, to the point of asserting a kind of moral equivalency between the Russian and American governments. Since he assumed office, Trump and certain aides have encouraged in America the kind of “oost-truth” environment that has prevailed in Russia under Putin. The new president has shown no interest in an American role in promoting human rights and democracy around the world; indeed, he seemed to dismiss this core element of U.S. foreign policy in his initial address to Congress, instead emphasizing “harmony and stability” and “the sovereign rights of all nations.” Under these circumstances, to rely first and foremost on the U.S. government to meet the chal- lenge posed by Russia, China, and other authoritarian states would amount to an exercise in futility. The role of governments, both in the United States and Europe, will remain crucial. But the threat posed by modern authoritarianism has spread well beyond its original proving grounds. To some extent, the prob- lems discussed in this report have already infected the United States and a number of European coun- tries. They represent a menace to the media, academ- ic freedom, civil society, electoral systems, and the rule of law. They even put in jeopardy the integrity of the facts and figures that an accountable government and a successful economy require. When the values of the political leadership are seen to waver, indepen- dent, nongovernmental voices and institutions will be called upon to do their part—not just to defend democracy at home, but to convince skeptical politi- cians and citizens that supporting the same struggle abroad serves the public interest. To the U.S. government: We urge the Trump adminis- tration to appoint a director of global communications who is experienced in journalism and allow that per- son to build a program to counter hostile authoritari- an messaging through up-to-date delivery techniques, honest reporting, and forthright commentary. Near the end of 2016, Congress passed legislation that placed the country’s government-supported interna- tional media outlets—Voice of America (VOA), Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL), and their sister services focused on Asia and other regions—under more direct presidential control, on the theory that a commander-in-chief who was committed to counter- ing aggressive Russian influence would be better able to develop and implement new strategies. President Trump has yet to indicate how he intends to use this authority. In the contest against Soviet communism, America’s international broadcasting entities were the crown jewels of U.S. soft power. Indeed, in some countries, such as Poland or Romania, Radio Free Europe functioned as the opposition press, and clearly had a greater audience and more influence than the censored government press. In the post-Cold War period, what were initially shortwave radio services have evolved into modern media outlets, with video content, podcasts, blogs, social media engagement, and other forms of information delivery. Nevertheless, the United States today needs to update the strategy and operations of its publicly supported broadcast- ers and—most importantly—provide them with the resources to compete with a Russian propaganda machine that is nimble, attuned to popular discontent, and generously funded. To the independent media: The mainstream press in the United States has recently shown increased interest in reporting on Russian methods of infor- mation warfare, some of which have been embraced by far-right media outlets that seek to undermine popular support for the core institutions of Ameri- can democracy. We urge more responsible media to www.freedomhouse.org soy] HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019293