DOJ-OGR-00005040.jpg
Extracted Text (OCR)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 335 Filed 09/03/21 Page1of3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT USDC SDNY
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK cake beiencine
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #:
DATE FILED: 9/3/21
United States of America,
_y_
20-CR-330 (AJN)
Ghislaine Maxwell,
ORDER
Defendant.
ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge:
Defendant seeks the Government’s “disclosure of the identities of the unnamed co-
conspirators alleged in the S2 indictment.” Dkt. No. 331 at 1. In its August 13 Opinion &
Order, this Court noted that the Government had not objected to Defendant’s two prior requests
that the Government identify the unnamed co-conspirators. Dkt. No. 317 at 12 n.1; see also Dkt.
No. 331 at 1. On August 18, 2021, the Government filed a letter stating that it “objects to any
requirement that it provide an exhaustive list of co-conspirators, whether in a bill of particulars
or otherwise . . . absent further order of the Court.” Dkt. No. 320 at 1. The Court concludes that
the Government’s objection comes too late as the Government had multiple opportunities to raise
its objection before this Court issued its opinion. For this and the foregoing reasons, the Court
concludes that at the same time that the Government discloses Jencks Act materials, the
Government must also disclose to the Defendant the identities of all unnamed co-conspirators
alleged in the S2 indictment to whom it will refer at trial. See United States v. Bin Laden, 92 F.
Supp. 2d 225, 241 (S.D.N.Y. 2000).
Even if the Court were to find that the Government had not waived its objection, it would
find unpersuasive the Government’s justifications for withholding this information. “In
considering whether to grant a request for identification of unnamed co-conspirators, ‘the Court
1
DOJ-OGR-00005040
Extracted Information
Document Details
| Filename | DOJ-OGR-00005040.jpg |
| File Size | 639.1 KB |
| OCR Confidence | 93.3% |
| Has Readable Text | Yes |
| Text Length | 1,778 characters |
| Indexed | 2026-02-03 16:55:55.460020 |