EFTA02514791.pdf
PDF Source (No Download)
Extracted Text (OCR)
From:
jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>
Sent:
Tuesday, November 18, 2014 7:51 PM
To:
Kathy Ruemmler
Subject:
Re:
I would be happy to sit with him,
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 3=50 PM, Kathy Ruemmler <
> wrote=
DO1 Watchdog Wants Gre=ter Attorney Ethics Oversight
Zoe Tillman,=Legal Times
November 18, 2014
Investigating a=legations of attorney misconduct—and giving transparency to the pr=cess—continue to pose
challenges for the U.S. Department of Justic=, according to a new report
<http://www.justice.gov/oig/challenges/2014.htm> by the de=artment's independent inspector general.
Inspector General =ichael Horowitz urged Congress to adopt legislation that would give his of=ice more
authority to investigate alleged misconduct by DOJ lawyers. That =unction is primarily carried out by the department's
Office of Pro=essional Responsibility.
"The OIG has long questioned the ca=ving out of this exclusive role for [the Office of Professional Responsibi=ityj
as it is managed as a component of the department, has no institution=l independence, and lacks transparency in that it
does not regularly relea=e its reports and conclusions to the public," Horowitz wrote in th= inspector general's annual
report to Congress, which the office announced on Monday.
The Just=ce Department has long faced criticism for the lack of transparency when i= comes to how officials
handle complaints of attorney misconduct. The Offi=e of Professional Responsibility in most cases keeps information
about its=investigations secret. It has occasionally releases public reports on high=profile matters, such as the firing of
six U.S. attorneys in 2006 and the =otched prosecution of Ted Stevens in 2008.
The office's most recent annual report said that in 2013 =he office determined that 93 of the 819 complaints it
received were worth =dditional review, and launched full investigations into 33 of those matter=.
Under federal regulations, the inspector general's office=can ask the deputy attorney general for permission to
open an ethics inves=igation. That process "leaves the decision entirely to the departm=nt leadership and, in any event,
requiring the OIG to seek the department=E2 s permission before undertaking an investigation compromises our
i=dependence," Horowitz wrote.
Sens. Mike Lee, R-Utah, and Jo= Tester, D-Mont., introduced legislation in March
<http://www.lee.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/20=4/3/lee-tester-introduce-bill-to-ensure-proper-investigations-at-doj>
EFTA_R1_01648763
EFTA02514791
to remove the referral requirement, giving the inspector general =80 s office full authority to initiate attorney
misconduct investigation=. The Senate Judiciary Committee has yet to act on the bill.
Lawmak=rs and the inspector general's office have credited the recent pus= on ethics and transparency to a
report published earlier this year <http://www.pogo.org/our-work/r=ports/2014/hundreds-of-justice-attorneys-
violated-standards.html> by the Project on Government Oversight. The study identified hundred= of ethics violations by
DOJ attorneys and was critical of the lack of tra=sparency surrounding the Office of Professional Responsibility's
i=vestigations.
A Justice Department representative could not immedia=ely be reached for comment.
The inspector general's report =dentified seven overarching challenges facing the department: upholding pu=lic
integrity, which included the issues with misconduct investigations; t=e state of the federal prison system; the balancing
of civil liberties wit= national security concerns; enhancing cybersecurity; using a performance-=ased management
system; oversight of law enforcement programs; and protect=ng taxpayer money.
please =ote
The information contained in this communication is confiden=ial, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute
inside informati=n, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the propert= of JEE Unauthorized use,
disclosure or copying of this communica=ion or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If =ou have
received this communication in error, please notify us immediatrly by return e-mail or by e-mail to
jeevacation@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacation@gmail=com> , and destroy this comm=nication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -=11 rights reserved
2
EFTA_M_01648764
EFTA02514792
Document Preview
PDF source document
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.
Extracted Information
Email Addresses
Document Details
| Filename | EFTA02514791.pdf |
| File Size | 193.4 KB |
| OCR Confidence | 85.0% |
| Has Readable Text | Yes |
| Text Length | 4,386 characters |
| Indexed | 2026-02-12T18:37:57.408771 |