DOJ-OGR-00005395.jpg

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 380 Filed 10/29/21 Page 2 of54 TABLE OF CONTENTS Did x 0d Day We, eS ego Wd A OY 8 RESET ec essee ape pean eC mens Me PROERT SNC NR ere Up ee 2 FE |, fl See nee eee eae nec an re se ie ee cceee rer eee ne eee eneerer a ane eneneer rer raat 3 if The Court Should Permit Certain Witnesses to Testify Under Pseudonyms or Using First Names, and Permit the Sealing of Related Exhibits... ..ececesceeececceseeeeeeeeeseeeeeeeceeeeeeeeneeees 3 A. Applicable Law ............cccccececceseseeeecscesceseeseeeessesecaecscesesaesaessesaeseeseeseesecaeeseeaceeseaeeaeseeecaeeaeeateneees 4 Ti, TOR eect aro aemeee napa a Oe eater aaa i 10 IL. The Minor Victims’ Prior Consistent Statements Are Admissible for Their Truth If the PR a eae bg Sn ne ee 17 A 17 B. DisCUsSiOD ........2....csceseecesesseseseesesseseseeseseeseneesessesessesesecaesscsssacsenaeseesesesecseseseteeseeateeeaeeceeeeeeteaees 19 Ill. The Court Should Preclude Evidence or Argument About Investigations of the Defendant ..20 A. The Court Should Not Permit the Defense to Elicit Evidence About Charging Decisions or BARR Te ceri igi TR ss raccnssrsc ncn csneseerss pease cam Rd A Sa ln 22 B. The Court Should Preclude Evidence or Argument About the Length of And Investigative eR PR ee at | | 29 C. The Defense Should Not Be Permitted to Call Case Agents Without First Proffering a Valid ee eT ee 32 IV. The Court Should Preclude Evidence or Argument About the Government’s Alleged Motives Tit DIS icra ontnrcne emanate ete cetcposn ula ero a coaresia a aciiad 33 V. The Court Should Preclude Challenges to the Credibility of Individuals Who Are Not WREST Ta gs cee me 36 Ss Evidence or Argument that Minor Victims Consented to Sexual Abuse is Inadmissible....... 38 Vil. Before Offering Evidence or Argument of the Defendant’s Failure to Commit Other Bad Acts, the Court Should Require the Defense to Proffer the Basis and Relevance of Such EVIGeNCe o.....eeeeceeeeceeecceseeccceceesceceeesecceesessceceeenscceceessaeceesessccssessueceseseceesesssseceeeeeseeseeesseereeseseeeeeess Al VU. The Court Should Not Permit the Defendant to Introduce Her Own Prior Statements........... 44 The Court Should Preclude Evidence or Argument Sounding in Nullification ...................... 47 m2 The Defendant Should Be Precluded from Arguing That She Was A “Prevailing Party” in FIR SII ccc tench nant eRe SRC ROSA ASIA ESER AINE NALA ENOL 51 CONC EUSTON ico cecsccss srseasianceastices cans saccades acces araceaeiaeaiats staal ncn tical caste as etal cay caiats ste loce lcs ioeadLeeediceaazeee 53 DOJ-OGR-00005395