HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023312.jpg
Extracted Text (OCR)
on the returns. a cashflow that is misleading helped prepare financial statements ( april ) Oversight on new
grats- first at 22 and then at 19 that were done without my consultation and were "resolved" soley as a result
of my last minute intervention. . 600 million in after tax savings was just accomplished. (BTW- for some
reason you left the 30 million outstanding that I had said should only be done" if" that was my additional
fee. and not used for non biz purposes and not art.
Sorry but .,
in June and then again Sept, we both agreed to a 50% of phaidon payout first projected at 20 . but less when
artspace and debt taken out, - then only after weeks, when you delayed any detailed discussion of money
wanting to give the issue a thoughtful response ( which I fully understand ) . you unilaterally changed our
agreement.. 5m would be reserved for the future ? . and out of the remaining 15m ,? 1 would receive only a
third. (note: I'm confident that both the debt , and the art space investment will also lead to a write- off of
another 30 m. plus ) In my dining room ,you were surprised when I said that i require most people to pay
their advisory fee up front so that I am assured that I will be properly compensated for my work when
strategies are implemented . you may recall that you appeared offended and said " are you suggesting that 1
would go back on my word " I said no , of course not ! you are my closest of friends ,but my experience is
that when amounts get large, people tend to get unhappy when it actually comes time for them to pay.
I include below the email i sent to you on April 15, the day i was examining your returns It laid out my
understanding of the compensation agreed for a transaction of the magnitude to the penny of the one just
completed.ic 600m When it appeared that the transcation would and could go foward I was the first to point
out that our agreement would cost you too much money, therefore
more details
From day one I proposed to discount our agreement toa 50-60 million range. An extremely fair price for
all the transactions just completed . including Phaidon. - I was never told that this was out of range. in
fact, alternative methods of payment .ie my plane, or an -in-kind payment were discussed (
ie including keeping the 30m portion of the fee outstanding till March ) ,I provided , only because you
specifically requested a detailed step by step execution plan and reviewed all documents that 1 was given
access to. ( Phaidon was never forthcoming ) in order to make my many corrections . ( as 1 said more needed
on phaidon ). Iwas then told that Alans involvement warranted a discount. Even in the best of light ,
though it is beyond question that not one time in the three years of his retainer has he ever proposed a
unique idea. (including any way to deal with the use issue on debras death ,or even the most basic review of
your largest asset by far , the BRH agreement. ) O.K. - lets say he made a contribution to the plan and stretch
reality beyond the pale and say it was 50 %. though no one could posit such a large amount unless they were
wearing a clown suit. , the payment and our formula of 37 percent associated with the deal was known . It
had both sent in writing and spoken about on the phone numerous times , a detailed execution plan was
provided . then and only then, after the entire transaction was laid out for the group to follow You told
me that after a number of conversations with brad karp that a total of only 20m would be paid , (and even that
was more than you originally contemplated ) for both transactions . Leon I feel It was remarkably unfair. Did
brad even knew of our prior agreements.? ?, I would ask that you I and Brad karp sit together if you think it
would be helpful. . I would like to send him this email, with your consent of course. Ifthe transactions were
never consummated , i would not be owed a dime, however , the expected fee was known up front. , the
detailed step by step plan was followed and overseen by me, the amount that I had requested before the
transaction had even begun, had already been heavily discounted, out of friendship, . I believe the decision re
only paying 20m has frankly , left me felling quite uneasy. and colors the view about the Athene or
Rothschild transaction.
Date: Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 2:39 PM
Subject:
you've agreed that
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023312
Extracted Information
Dates
Document Details
| Filename | HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023312.jpg |
| File Size | 0.0 KB |
| OCR Confidence | 85.0% |
| Has Readable Text | Yes |
| Text Length | 4,401 characters |
| Indexed | 2026-02-04T16:50:26.629350 |