DOJ-OGR-00005666.jpg

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 387 Filed 10/29/21 Page2of21 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PRELIMINARY STATEMENT ........cececsecsesscesessesseseesseeseveecnevseceaeseesaesaeseesneesesneeseenaeseesaesaevatens 1 BACKGROUND 1... eececsecessessceseseeseseeeseeaevseeneesecnseseesaesaesaesaevseenevseenaessesaessesaesaevsesneeeenaesaeaesateatens 2 ARGUMENT .......ececeececessceseseessessevsecneesecneescensessesaesaevsesnevseeneeseensescessessessesaevseenevsecnaeeesaesaesaeeneeatens 5 I. POP LCABLS LAW es ssse: cacemscmscmenns w.semrescmnenn ea seven eNINKeO NMDA SEITE ma SRO RICE Me NEN NN eR 5 II. Evidence Related to Accuser-3 Is Not Proof of the Charged Conspiracies..............:0s0 7 Il. Evidence Related to Accuser-3 Is Not Admissible Under Rule 404(b) and Should be Ecchoded Under Ril 403 asics: snssssewn cations cecoseinareows SAeaitnacreNsin HaeRING SISTENT ceISRTO ANNE Has 10 IV. In the Alternative, the Court Should Preclude the Government and Accuser-3 from Representing that Accuser-3 Was a “Minor,” or that She Was “Sexually Abused” by Epstein, and Give the Jury an Appropriate Limiting Instruction.............c:cecceeeeeeeees 14 CONCLUSION... ceeececeeecsseseessesseesecnevsecneeseesseseesaesaevaesnevseeneeseesaessessesaeaesnevsrenaeseeeaeseesaesaeeaeenees 16 DOJ-OGR-00005666