Back to Results

DOJ-OGR-00006096.jpg

Source: IMAGES  •  Size: 456.6 KB  •  OCR Confidence: 93.9%
View Original Image

Extracted Text (OCR)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 410-1 Filed 11/04/21 Page 30 of 93 Count Four: Transportation of a Minor to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity — Second Element The second element of Count Four which the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt is that the-defendentMs. Maxwell transported theindsadual [Jane Doe-1 pseudonym] with the intent that the individualshe engage in anysexual activity with Jeffrey Epstein for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense_in violation of New York In order to establish this element, it is not necessary for the government to prove that the illegal sexual activity was thedefendantsMs. Maxwell’s sole purpose for transporting Jane Doe- 1 across state lines. A person may have several different purposes or motives for such conduct, and each may prompt in varying degrees the person’s actions. The government must prove pose of Jane Doe-1’s beyond a reasonable doubt, however, that a significant & Commented [RA(45]: The Government repeats its objection from page 21 travel across state lines was that she would engage in illegal sexual activity with Jeffrey Epstein. In other words, the illegal sexual activity must not have been merely incidental to the trip. Adapted from Sand, et al., Modern Federal Jury Instructions, Instrs. and 64-4, 64-18: Edward J. Devitt et al., Federal Jury Practice and Instructions, Instr. 60-07: and the charge of the Hon. Denise L. Cote in United States v. Purcell, 18 Cr. 081 (DLC). See United States v. Vargas-Cordon, 733 F.3d 366, 375 (2d Cir. 2013) (“[T]he contemplated unlawful sexual activity need not be the defendant's sole purpose for transporting a minor in interstate or foreign commerce. Rather, it must only be a ‘dominant purpose’ of the transportation.”); United States v. Miller, 148 F.3d 207, 212 (2d Cir. 1998) (finding no error in jury instruction that engaging in illegal sexual activity “need not have been [the defendant’s] only purpose or motivation, but it must have been more than merely incidental; it must have been one of the dominant purposes of the trip”). 30 DOJ-OGR-00006096

Document Preview

DOJ-OGR-00006096.jpg

Click to view full size

Extracted Information

Dates

Document Details

Filename DOJ-OGR-00006096.jpg
File Size 456.6 KB
OCR Confidence 93.9%
Has Readable Text Yes
Text Length 2,105 characters
Indexed 2026-02-03 17:07:14.671177