DOJ-OGR-00000613.jpg
Extracted Text (OCR)
be
N
Ww
ws
Oo
OY
~]
oO
Ke)
a
fan)
=
be
N
Ww
=
Hs
Oo
a
OY
a
~]
a
oO
a
Ke)
20
21
22
23
24
25
Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 42
j7v2espC kjc
THE COURT: So, today's
the end of the July 18 court cont
Filed 08/06/19 Page 2 of 10
conference was scheduled at
ference hearing on that date.
I thought that we would devote at
t least the -—- well, probably
most of today's proceeding to talking about the schedule in
this case, and I asked the lawyers to get together and see if
would include trial date, motion
they could come up with a mutually agreeable schedule, which
practice, discovery, etc.
Does anybody want to let me know how you made out?
MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.
We have conferred with defense counsel and talked
about a proposed schedule for this case. So we are prepared to
propose to the court today a schedule for discovery, for
discovery-related motions, for pretrial motions, and we are
also prepared to talk about setting a possible trial date.
THE COURT: Okay. What
have you got in mind?
MS. MOE: So, with respect to discovery, we would
propose a discovery deadline of October 31 to complete
discovery, with one exception. There are materials from
devices seized from the defendant's residence in New York,
and
the F.B.I. is beginning the process of reviewing that data.
In discussing that with
defense counsel, we have begun
to discuss a process for a privilege-review protocol. It's
possible that process may take longer than October 31. But
aside from that universe of documents, we would propose setting
a schedule of October 31 as a deadline for discovery.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT
REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00000613
Document Details
| Filename | DOJ-OGR-00000613.jpg |
| File Size | 635.0 KB |
| OCR Confidence | 90.8% |
| Has Readable Text | Yes |
| Text Length | 1,700 characters |
| Indexed | 2026-02-03 16:03:24.607593 |