DOJ-OGR-00000617.jpg
Extracted Text (OCR)
be
NO
Ww
ws
Oo
OY
~]
oO
Ke}
a
oO
he
be
No
(ee)
=
Hs
Oo
_
OY
a
~]
a
oO
a
Ke}
20
21
22
23
24
25
Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB
j7v2espC kjc
have the discovery,
the schedule
THE
COURT
: That's what
the subi
for motions.
Document 42
that we could make a comprehensive bri
Filed 08/06/19 Page 6
fing along the
I was going to suggest, if
of 10 6
Facial discovery, if you will, so
lines of
there is a time period when you could put it all together, as
is a lot of
Flexibil
it were, and there
these dates,
With respect to the trial date,
either June or September of 2020.
the calendar
from my point of
you know,
in June?
fF view,
when
[ block out.
MR.
the court block ou
WEINB
ERG:
So
for now.
you are all ready,
ity. So I wil
1 leave
I could accommodate
The issue is not so much as,
but what part of
is it realistic to block out time
think it is -
—- I don't want
t a six-week time and then come to
to have
the court
in March and say we need a continuance and risk a September
date.
TH
are saying,
Okay. So a September date, you
E COURT: Got it.
sounds like it certainly is realistic.
MR. WEINBERG: Thirteen months sounds like the amount
of time that
we WoO
magnitude and scope.
LEE,
COURT
: All right. That i
s fine for me.
uld ordinarily need to prepare a case of this
Just while we are taking care of details, a speedy
trial issue or application?
September of
2020?
SOU
Why don't we extend it to
THERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00000617
Document Details
| Filename | DOJ-OGR-00000617.jpg |
| File Size | 558.3 KB |
| OCR Confidence | 89.4% |
| Has Readable Text | Yes |
| Text Length | 1,540 characters |
| Indexed | 2026-02-03 16:03:27.064738 |