DOJ-OGR-00006281.jpg
Extracted Text (OCR)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 424-3 Filed 11/08/21 Page 13 of 29
Pathways to False Allegations 107
Intoxication
As a prerequisite for this pathway, the consumption of intoxicating sub-
stances must have led to distortions in information processing. There
are currently many drugs that are used by sexual assault perpetrators to
incapacitate victims (Horvath & Brown, 2005). These drugs may include
Rohypnol (e.g., “roofies”) and amphetamines, muscle relaxants, alcohol, or
antihistamines. Other drugs, such as gamma hydroxybutyrate, cocaine, and
ketamine have also been indicated in drug-assisted sexual assault cases (see
Horvath & Brown, 2005; Hindmarch & Brinkmann, 1999). In a forensic case,
it is important to determine whether the accuser voluntarily or involuntarily
consumed drugs. If the drugs were not voluntarily consumed, it is likely that
the individual who drugged the claimant had premeditated plans to control
the claimant (Welner, 2001), regardless of whether the perpetrator assaulted
the claimant.
Though consent issues are clearly important considerations when
determining the nature of sexual behaviors while intoxicated, they are super-
fluous considerations in this pathway. Under most state laws, a person
cannot legally consent to sexual activity while intoxicated (Davis & Loftus,
2008). In fact, even if consent to engage in sexual activity is ex ante (before
the first dose of the intoxicating substance), the act of engaging in sex-
ual activity while intoxicated can later be determined to be non-consensual
sexual activity and is often sufficient evidence to convict someone of rape.
Therefore, issues of consent, for these reasons, will not be discussed in the
context of this pathway.
A key issue in this pathway is whether the claimant believes that he
or she was sexually assaulted while under the influence of intoxicating sub-
stances, when in reality no sexual activity took place or activity occurred very
different from what she is now claiming (e.g., she claimed penetration when
no penetration occurred). Some drugs, when consumed at sufficient levels,
may cause impairments in information processing—sensation, perception,
storage, or retrieval. Substances known to cause these effects are alco-
hol, sedatives/hypnotics (e.g., benzodiazepines, soporifics), and anxiolytics
(American Psychiatric Association, 2000). High doses of alcohol have been
shown to inhibit memory in humans and animals (Bisby, Leitz, Morgan, &
Curran, 2010; Crego et al., 2009; Spinetta et al., 2008). Moreover, upon ceas-
ing to use these drugs, withdrawal symptoms may include delirium and
psychotic disorders (American Psychiatric Association, 2000; Lin, Heacock, &
Fogel, in press)—two additional pathways to false allegations that will be
discussed later in this paper.
The information-processing errors of the intoxicating substances men-
tioned above may cause confusion surrounding events that occurred while
a person was intoxicated. A person who does not accurately recall events
DOJ-OGR- 00006281
Extracted Information
Dates
Document Details
| Filename | DOJ-OGR-00006281.jpg |
| File Size | 827.5 KB |
| OCR Confidence | 94.9% |
| Has Readable Text | Yes |
| Text Length | 3,034 characters |
| Indexed | 2026-02-03 17:09:21.970572 |