DOJ-OGR-00006419.jpg

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 439 Filed 11/12/21 Page 2 of 69 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT .........cccecsecsesscssessesseseessecseveccneeseesaeseesaesaessesaeeeeeneeseenaeseesaesateatens 1 A, “The Tre Purpose 6f & MOON. 2) EM Oice: anncms soc axecrmcmess mssemma seems enema cen 1 B. Advisory Rulings are Not Appropriate Here ............ cc ecceeececeneeeeeeeeeeeseeceaeeeeeeesneesaeeenaeenneees Z C. The Court Should Reject the Government’s Attempts to Preview any Defense Case or Cross Examination .........ccceeesessseseeeseessecssecsecaeesseeseesseesaecnaesseeseeeseeaeenaecsaesseesaesseeaeenaeenaesas 4 I. THE GOVERNMENT’S PSEUDONYM TACTIC IS UNNECESSARY, UNWORKABLE, AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL IN THIS CASE 0.0... ceeeceseeecesessesseseevseeneveeeneeseesaeseesaesaeeaeens 4 A DI oo oosssoeeccssseccsssecssssecssnsccssnsecsssesssscesnssecsnsscesnseessnseessnsessneessnneesssseesneseesnseeesnseessneessneeee 5 |. [MM ooo enone ccee ee eeeeec eee eecceeeeeecceeeeeeecceeeeeeeecennnnscecennneneeennnnnsseeee 5 ee 10 3. [UU eens eecccceeeeeececennseeccennveeecennnneeensnnaness 12 B. The Government Has Failed to Carry its Burden to Establish the Extraordinary Need to Use Fake Names... ceecesesscesseeseessecsseceesseeseesseessecnaecauesaeeseesseesaecsaesaaesaeesneeseeaeenaesnaesas 15 C. SE «> <feats the Proffered Purpose for Using Fake Names..... 17 La DI soon ssossecssssccccseccssseccsnsccssnsccesnscssssscsssscesssecsnsessnseessnsecsnnsessnseessnseesreneesnseessneessnsees 17 a... 18 ee 19 E. Ne Legitimate Safely Coneertie af6 PRG6tih icc anomeacmmes acne aaemrescemene cane 19 ,. ee as No Nexus to Ms. Maxwell and Any Reference to Her Should Be Excluded -- Eliminating the Need for a Pseudonym or Other ALUIfiCe oo. cee eeeeeeecsseeeesaeeseesseesaecnaecsaesaeeseeeseesaeonaecsuesseeseesseesatenaessaesaeesaesseesaeenaesnaesas 20 G. , Hiding Their Identities and Those of Related Witnesses Serves No Legitimate PULpose ...........ecceecceesceseeeeeneeeseeeeeeecaeeceaeceeneeseeesaeeceaeeeeeseneeeeereaeens 20 H. The Use of Fake Names is Unfairly Prejudicial to Ms. Maxwell ..........ccceeceeeeeeeereeereeeees 20 I. SUPPRESSION OF THE EXHIBITS IS CONTRARY TO WELL-ESTABLISHED SECOND CIRCUIT LAW... ce cececceseescesessessecneesecneesecnseseesaessessesaevsecnevseenaeeeeaeseeeaeeaeeats 23 Il. PRE-TRIAL RULING ON “PRIOR CONSISTENT STATEMENTS” INAPPROPRIATE 23 A. The 2014 Amendments Did Not Change the Grounds for Which Prior Consistent Rimenients May Be ACATICE ass acorn armemcrmees smanmiea Sr mE SORE me.I MeN 24 B. Substantial Limits Remain on Admissibility of Prior Consistent Statements ...........0..0. 25 DOJ-OGR-00006419