Back to Results

EFTA00067509.pdf

Source: DOJ_DS9  •  Size: 44.4 KB  •  OCR Confidence: 85.0%
View Original Image

Extracted Text (OCR)

From: To: Cc: Sec: Subject: FW: Motion Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 20:16:31 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: Motion_ to_ Correct Sentence.wpd Here is Roy's e-mail with his draft. I would prefer that they provide the judge with a prepared order, but it is what it is. I am going to contact the person at PBSO in charge of work release to ask the following: (I) who should receive notice if there are misstatements in Mr. Epstein's application for work release? And (2) all of Mr. Epstein's victims are going to be notified of the work release, if any of them wish to be heard on the issue, to whom should they address their concerns? Any objections? Assistant U.S. Attorney WestaP 33401 Phone Fax ----Original Message--- From: Roy BLACK mailto Sent: Thursda , December 04, 2008 1:34 PM To: Cc: Subjec : e: o ion here is our motion to correct the sentence. As you can see Judge Pucillo is a retired judge who only handled McSorley's docket that day. Since the plea had to be done on that day due to our agreement Judge Pucillo handled it. Epstein's case has always been in division W which is McSorley and McSorley's order says all division W cases for work release are in the discretion of the sheriff. Also Jack says McSorley entered the new sentencing order without notice to anyone and in fact he didn't know it until this matter came up. >» 12/4/2008 12:51 PM >» Hi Roy - can you email the motion to and I before it is filed? Thank you. EFTA00067509

Document Preview

EFTA00067509.pdf

Click to view full size

Document Details

Filename EFTA00067509.pdf
File Size 44.4 KB
OCR Confidence 85.0%
Has Readable Text Yes
Text Length 1,483 characters
Indexed 2026-02-11T10:24:40.620981
Ask the Files