EFTA00067531.pdf

Case 1:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2008 FRIT1113w1 O_to D.C. ELECTRONIC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 08-80736-Civ-MAR RA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: IN RE: JANE DOE, Petitioner. JULY 7, 2008 STEVEN M. LARIMORE CLERK U.S. GIST. CT. S.D. OF FLA. • MIAMI enc y VICTIM'S PETITION FOR ENFORCEMENT OF CRIME VICTIM'S RIGHTS ACT, 18 U.S.0 . SECTION 3771 COMES NOW the Petitioner, JANE DOE (hereinafter "Petitioner"), by and through her undersigned attorneys, pursuant to the Crime Victim's Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 3771 ("CVRA"), and files this Petition for Enforcement in the above styled action as follows: 1. Petitioner, an adult, as a minor child was a victim of federal crimes committed by JEFFREY EPSTEIN (hereinafter "Defendant"). These crimes included sex trafficking of children by fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1591, use of a means of interstate commerce to entice a minor to commit prostitution, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422, as well as wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343. The Defendant committed these crimes within the jurisdiction of the Southern District of Florida in Palm Beach County, Florida. 2. Upon information and belief, the Defendant is the subject of a federal criminal investigation conducted by the United States of America in the Southern District of Florida. The Defendant has recently been prosecuted and pleaded guilty, on June 30, 2008, in the Circuit Court for Palm Beach County to various similar state offenses including solicitation of minors for prostitution. 3. Upon information and belief, the Defendant is engaged in plea negotiations with the Office of the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida concerning federal 1 o110 EFTA00067531 Case 1:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2008 Page 2 of 10 crimes which he is alleged to have committed against minor children, including the Petitioner. Such negotiations may likely result in a disposition of the charges in the next several days. 4. Under the CVRA, before any charges are filed against the Defendant, the Petitioner has the rights (among others) to notice of her rights under the CVRA, to confer with the prosecutors, and to be treated with fairness. As soon as charges are filed, the Petitioner has the rights (among others) to timely notice of court proceedings, the right not to be excluded from such proceedings, the right to be heard at such public proceedings regarding conditions of release, any plea, and any sentence, the right to confer with the attorney for the government. the right lo restitution, and the right to be treated with fairness and with respect for her dignity and privacy. 5. The Petitioner has been denied her rights in that she has received no consultation with the attorney for the government regarding the possible disposition of the charges, no notice of any public court proceedings, no information regarding her right to restitution, and no notice of rights under the CVRA, as required under law. 6. The Petitioner is in jeopardy of losing her rights, as described above, if the government is able to negotiate a plea or agreement with the Defendant without her participation :md knowledge. WHEREFORE, for the reasons outlined above, the Petitioner respectfully requests this Court to grant her Petition, and to order the United States Attorney to comply with the provisions of the CVRA prior to and including any plea or other agreement with the Defendant and any attendant proceedings. 2 20110 EFTA00067532 Case 1:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2008 Page 3 of 10 MEMORANDUM I. THE CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS ACT MAKES CRIME VICTIMS INDEPENDENT PARTICIPANTS THROUGHOUT THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROCESS. In October 2004, Congress passed and the President signed into law the Crime Victims' Rights Act, Pub. L. No. 108-405, 118 Stat. 2251 (codified at 18 U.S.C. § 3771). Because this appears to be the first case involving the Act to come before this Court, a bit of background may be in order. A. The CVRA Gives Crime Victims Rights to Participate in the Criminal Justice Process. Congress passed the CVRA "to give crime victims enforceable rights to participate in federal criminal proceedings." Opinion at 14. Congress was concerned that in the federal system crime victims were "treated as non-participants in a critical event in their lives. They were kept in the dark by prosecutors too busy to care enough ... and by a court system that simply did not have a place for them." 150 CONG. REC. S4262 (Apr. 22, 2004) (statement of Sen. Feinstein). To remedy this problem, Congress gave victims "the simple right to know what is going on, to participate in the process where the information that victims and their families can provide may be material and relevant ... ." Id. The CVRA gives victims of federal crimes a series of rights, including the right to notice of court proceedings, to be heard at plea and sentencing hearings, and to reasonably "confer with the attorney for the Government in the case." 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a). Victims also have a "right of access to the terms of a plea agreement ... ." In re Interested Party I, 530 F.Supp. 2d 136, 2008 WL 134233 at *7 (D.D.C. 2008). The CVRA also assures victims broadly that they will "be treated with fairness." 18 U.S.C. §3771(a)(8). 3 30110 EFTA00067533 Case 1:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2008 Page 4 of 10 Nair Of course, these rights would be of little use to most crime victims unless they were told about them. To ensure that victims are notified of their rights, the CVRA directs employees of the Justice Department "and other departments and agencies of the United States engaged in the detection, investigation, or prosecution of crime" to use their "best efforts to see that crime victims are notified of... the rights described [in the CVRA]." 18 U.S.C. § 3771(c)(1) (emphasis added).1 B. The CVRA Gives Victims Rights During the Investigation of a Crime. The CVRA gives victims rights during the investigation of a crime. The Fifth Circuit recently reached this conclusion, holding: The district court acknowledged that "[t]here are clearly rights under the CVRA that apply before any prosecution is underway." BP Prods., 2008 WL 501321 at •11, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12893, at *36. Logically, this includes the CVRA's establishment of victims' "reasonable right to confer with the attorney for the Government." 18 U.S.C. & 3771(a)(5). At least in the posture of this case (and we do not speculate on the applicability to other situations), the government should have fashioned a reasonable way to inform the victims of the likelihood of criminal charges and to ascertain the victims' views on the possible details of a plea bargain. la re Dean, 527 F.3d 391, 394 (516 Cir. 2008). The position that CVRA rights apply before charges have been filed is consistent with the Justice Department regulations under the CVRA, which explain that government officials "must advise a victim [about their rights under the CVRA] ... at the earliest opportunity at which it may be done without interfering with an investigation." A.G. GUIDELINES FOR VICTIM AND WITNESS I Further supporting this requirement is another statute, 42 U.S.C. § I 0607(cX3). which directs government officials tc provide victims with "the earliest possible notice of," among other things. "the filing of charges against a suspected offender." 4 4 of 10 EFTA00067534 Case 1:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2008 Page 5 of 10 Nat ASSISTANCE 23 (May 2005). And the plain language of the CVRA undergirds this conclusion, as it applies not simply to prosecutors but to government agencies "engaged in the detection [and) investigation ... of crime ... ." 18 U.S.C. § 3771(c)(1). Indeed, if there were any doubt, the plain language of the CVRA extends victims' right to situations "in which no prosecution is underway." 18 U.S.C. § 3771(d)(3). H. PETITIONER IS A "VICTIM PROTECTED BY THE CVRA. Under the CVRA the crime victim is defined as "a person directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of a Federal offense ... ." 18 U.S.C. Section 3771(e). In particular, Defendant called Petitioner when she was a minor over a telephone (a means of interstate communication) requesting that she perform a massage in exchange for payment. As Defendant well knew, that request was fraudulent, as he not only intended to receive a massage, but also intended to have her perform sexual acts in exchange for a cash payment to Petitioner. Only when Petitioner arrived at a Defendant's mansion as directed by Defendant, did Defendant reveal his true purpose of obtaining sexual favors in exchange for payment. This conduct violated 18 U.S.C. § 2422, which forbids using a means of interstate commerce to knowingly "induce" or "entice" a minor "to engage in prostitution." In addition, this conduct was both a use of "fraud" to obtain a commercial sex act, in violation of 18 U.S.0 § 1591, and use of wire communications to perpetrate a "scheme and artifice to defraud," in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343. It appears obvious that Petitioner was "directly and proximately" harmed by these crimes, thereby making her a victim under the CVRA. It should be emphasized that the CVRA "was designed to be a `broad and encompassing' statutory victims' bill of rights." United States v. 5 SOI10 EFTA00067535 Case 1 :08-cv-80736-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2008 Page 6 of 10 wisie ye' Degenhardt, 405 F.Supp.2d 1341, 1342 (D. Utah 2005) (quoting 150 Cong. Rec. S4261 (daily ed. Apr. 22, 2004) (statement of Sen. Feinstein)). Congress intended the CVRA to dramatically rework the federal criminal justice system. In the course of construing the CVRA generously, the Ninth Circuit observed: "The criminal justice system has long functioned on the assumption that crime victims should behave like good Victorian children -- seen but not heard. The Crime Victims' Rights Act sought to change this by making victims independent participants in the criminal justice process." Kenna v. U.S. Dist. Court for C.D. Cal., 435 F.3d 1011, 1013 (9th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, because the CVRA is remedial legislation, courts should interpret it "liberally to facilitate and accomplish its purposes and intent." Elliott Industries Ltd. Partnership v. BP America Production Co., 407 F.3d 1091, 1118 (10th Cir. 2005) (noting remedial legislation should be "interpreted liberally to facilitate and accomplish its purposes and intent"). The CVRA itself suggests this conclusion by requiring that courts must treat crime victims with "fairness." United States v. Patkar, 2008 WL 233062 at *3 (D. Haw. 2008) (citing United States v. Turner, 367 F.Supp.2d 319, 335 (E.D.N.Y. 2005)). Not only must the CVRA as a whole be interpreted liberally, but its definition of "crime victim" requires a generous construction. After reciting the direct-and-proximate-harm language at issue here, one of the Act's two co-sponsors -- Senator Kyl -- explained that "(t)his is an intentionally broad definition because all victims of crime deserve to have their rights protected ." 150 Cong. Rec. S10912 (Oct. 9, 2004) (emphasis added). The description of the victim definition as "intentionally broad" was in the course of floor colloquy with the other primary sponsor of the CVRA and therefore deserves significant weight. See Kenna, 435 F.3d at 1015-16 (discussing significance of CVRA sponsors= floor statements). 6 6 Of 10 EFTA00067536 Case 1:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2008 Page 7 of 10 vow The definition of "crime victims" must thus be construed broadly in favor of Petitioner. She obviously qualifies as a "victim" under the CVRA. III. PETITIONER IS ENTITLED TO NOTICE OF HER RIGHTS, AN OPPORTUNITY TO CONFER WITH THE PROSECUTORS AND TO BE TREATED WITH FAIRNESS. Because Petitioner is a "victim" under the CVRA, she has certain protected rights under the Act. Most important, the Act promises that she will have an opportunity to "confer with the attorney for the Government in the case." To date, Petitioner has not been given that right. This raises that very real possibility that the Government may negotiate and conclude a plea agreement with the Defendant without giving Petitioner her protected rights.2 Petitioner is entitled to have this conference with prosecutors before any final plea agreement is reached. The Fifth Circuit reached exactly this conclusion in a very recent case. In In re Dean, 527 F.3d 391 (5th Cir. 2008), the Government negotiated a plea agreement with the well-heeled corporate defendant without conferring with the victims. When the Government's fitilure was challenged in the Fifth Circuit, the Fifth Circuit concluded that the Government had indeed violated the CVRA. The Fifth Circuit observed: "In passing the [CVRA), Congress made the policy decision-which we are bound to enforce-that the victims have a right to inform the plea negotiation process by conferring with prosecutors before a plea agreement is reached." Id. at 394. This Court is obligated to protect the rights of Petitioner. The CVRA directs that "[i]n any court proceeding involving an offense against a crime victim, the court shall ensure that the 2 On information and belief, roughly the same crimes were committed against several other young females. These victims, too, are in danger of losing their right to confer under the CVRA. 7 Tot 10 EFTA00067537 Case 1:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2008 Page 8 of 10 crime victim is afforded the rights described in [the CVRA]." 18 U.S.C. § 3771(bX1). The CVRA also confers on crime victims the right to "assert the rights described in [the CVRA]." 18 U.S.C. § 3771(d)(1). Therefore, this Court has its own independent obligation to intercede and ensure that the Government respects the rights of Petitioner under the CVRA. CONCLUSION The Petitioner requests the intervention of this Court to ensure that her rights are respected and accorded, as promised in the Crime Victims' Rights Act. DATED this 7th day of July, 2008. Respectfully Submitted, THE LAW OFFICE OF BRAD EDWARDS & ASSOCIATES, LLC Brad Edwards, Esquire Attorne for • ' 2028 Harrison Street Suite 202 Holl wood Flori 8 80110 EFTA00067538 Case 1:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2008 Page 9 of 10 yor vow CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing has been provided by United States mail and via facsimile to: ANN MARIE C. VILLAFANA, AUSA, United States Attorney's Office, 500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401, this 7th day of July, 2008. Brad Edwards, Esquire Atto • ' 9 90110 EFTA00067539 08-8AP0SciA ..15 Ike. 10.1 ntered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2008 FE r e gl0ail 0 D.C. CIVIL COVER SHEET ELaT •IteJS 44 civ I cover sheet and the infonnation contained herein neither replace nor mpplentent the filing and service of pleadings or other papers Sy kcal rules of cant. This form. approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in Sevccmba 1974. is required for the use of the Clerk Ile civil cockg sheet. isEF INS/RUC TIONS ON THE REVERSE Of THE FORM.) NOTICE: Attorneys MUST Indicate All Re-flied I. (a) PLAINTIFF'S DEFENDANTS on,repl $-67Pcs- -Z-; re: i -4ne. Poe (b) I:ounn of Residence of First Listed Plainlilf f skifrn BC4 lE X( EPS IN V.S. PLAINTIFF CASES, 'Finn game. Addrem. and Teleplione Rabe° am &rod oiPet 64sader is-ntsso6e-t-es ens Ahr,4.5-0,/ Stere-t4 .svire 202. AV/ Avg) )CC 55°Z° III Cheek County Where Action Arcox 3 m mgt. gin or 3 MONROE 3 BROW ARD JULY 7, 2008 STEVEN M. LARINORE CLERK US. 0IST. CT. S.D. OF FLA. • MIAMI Canny of Residence of First Listed Defendant ON L .S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY) NOTE: IN LAND ( ONDEMNATION CASES. USE THE LOCATION OF THE TR %CT LAND INVOLVED. k. arrYs Ace e PALM BEACH 3 MARTIN 3 ST. LUCIE 3 INDIAN RIVER 7 OKEECHOBEE 1110111. ANDS II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION iPlace aa "X' ita Ore Don Oaly) S (comment 3 3 Feelml0maios Pl4eatiff 1U.S.Cicnetommea Nu. • Piny) 1 (1 U.S. Gt.etaimeat Etter day Og c- V go-73 Q, 7 4 Diversely !Isom Camenship of Panics in Hem III) V. I E OF IT, III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PA RTIEStrine an 'X' m one ao. an Pinang Igor Danny Can Onl, • and Om Ho* Ea Deftedam) PTF DEF PTF DEF Cairn of This Seale 3 I 3 I Incorporand u. Primer& Place J 4 74 of BeiSIDO3 1. MIS S ate X 0 Rot Caves of Anodic. SW* ( oina sr Sabo.. of. Foreign (mno 3 7 Incerpoemed and Pewee/pal Place 1 5 3 5 of &amen In Ameba Sum 1 3 1 1 Foreign Sawn 3 6 3 € C CONTRACT TORTS FORFEIT/. RE/PENALTY BANKRU.PTCY OTHER STATLTES ' Ill. Mufame : 120 Mater : 1)0 Miller Ace T 140 Negotiable Inatutient ' I50 Etc nee, of Oterpaymen. & Le foseemene of helpnem ' 151 %Inhere A ea ' 152 XHJICI) of Delathed %Sem loan. (Etc . Voer.inie : 153R es net) of thermnom of Veto IN. Bentlii Te IRO Stralebeldetit Sum ti 190 01bN( mewl Te 195(ton...a Product tabelity tt 194 km chase PERSONAL IN.01/11, 3 310 A are 3 315 A raker Peodace Lability 3 320 ANaish. Libel & Slander 3 3)0 Federal t employee.' Lobelia 3 340 Mama 3 345 Made Product Labile,' 3 350 Maio. Vehicle 7 355 Moist Vehicle Perdue* Labile, 73600 her Personal loom PERSONAL INJURY 3 )62 /Noose Injury • Med Marimba 3 365 Personal &pry • Piodmi Liability 3 )68 Asbearia Peramal lumry Product Waal, PERSONAL PROPERTY 3 370 Otter Fraud 3 371 Toth in Lowden 3 00 Other Penciled PlOpelly Damage 1 185 Property Damage Product Liability 1 6)0 Apicsbure 3 420 Other Food a Deeig 3 625 Drop Reamed Smote of Pmperey 21 VS(' Net 3 630 Lemon Leas 3 640 R.R. & Trott 1 650 Airline Rep. 3 660 Occupaikeal Sakcylreatth 7 690 Oiher 1 a:: Appeal NI USE I 511 1 423 Wandraaal III US(' 157 3 400 Sea c Reapoortamment 3 410 Amoebae 3 4506m Is and Dank mg 3 450 Comment 3 460 Deponanon 3 470 Rat Weer Influmwed and ComuN Orgatatatioas 3 4110 C flamer Coda 3 490 Cable Sat TV 3 1110 SO eon e Senice 1 1150 Sec MINS COMMOdalli• Eactmage 3 E75 Curalma Challenge IT CSC 3410 3 890 Other ' era Acacias 1 Mil ArCialittai Atli 3 $92 ter ROOK Subduatioa Ad 1893 Ern tonmental Neaten 3 hot Emig) 11locaion no 5 095 Feerdem ollnlonnatema Act 3 900 Appealof Fee Naomi...non Wider I palArm. is /mote 5 950 CorsmuianaMa of State 510. 1" PROPERTY RIGHTS 1 1130 (omaipt* 3 100 Paine 1 1140 Trademark LABOR SOCIAL SECURITY 3 '10 F.et Cabot Standard* An 3 720 LaboreMgmi. Rebhan* 3 730 LalmeNsmiteporting a Diolaaure Aci 3 740 aaaaa y Labor Act 5 790 Other Loot Icaparm 3 MI Empl. Realm:. SM.! /I} Aci 1 061 HI/111195M 3 SteT Bract Lung 0231 7061 DIWC DIWW tango 1 x64 5510 Tale XVI 3 *65 1151.405i011 E REAL PROPERTY CIVIL RIGHTS PRISONER PETITIONS FEDERAL TAX SUITS 110 Lai(. nde mason 110 loreclo• me 1 230 Real louse d. Ececimeal I :40 Torre iti LanJ i 243 To. 'Name Lawn* 7, 390 All Mar Real Progeny 3 441 %troop 3 442 Employment 7413 H'.s Aorommodstions 3 444 worm 441 Matt a (Gnomon - 3 cm a ployeneal 3 446 Allier. a Diaabeletep • 018" X440 Other (ma R,Ms 3 510 Menu.. to Vacate Sentence Habeas C : 1 530 °canal I 335 Dram hush, 3 340 Mandamus & Olio 3 no ," aims 7 555 Perms Condoms 3 070 Taill• IU 5 Mama or Defeadietil 3071 IRS Ilned Para :6 USC 7609 I I arms carte 3 4" Nekffininh" Apploatios 3 463 Heat. C orpas.A lien Detainee 3 465015. Immigrate,. Aenona V. ORIGIN 1Place a - X" in One a.. mop i t I Original, 2 Removed from 3 3 Re-fded- Proem( ng State Court Tree VI below) Tra O 4 Reinstated or a 5 wpm, district nsferred from 16 Mullidistrict Reopened IsPecifY) Litigation Appeal to District Judge from ' Stagistrate Judgment VI. RELATED/RE-FILED (:ASE(S). a) Re-filed Case O YES ONO b) Related Cases 1 YES ONO 1See mammon* second rasa JUDGE DOCKET NUMBER VII. CAUSE OF ACTION Cit the U.S. Civil Statute tinder which you are filing and Write a Brief Statement of Cunt (Do not cit.:jurisdictional statutes unless dhersity): Cn)ne te/ 741.4,4:f IVIIPS oil er USG 5 7 71 Pet* 'eon on behalf vi vicNsi o$ Sex ohcfnses to GC acco.-0,ed ham rviret- vndee 11 CV#tt LENGTH OF TRIAL via 1 days estimated ,for both sides to try entire ease) VIII. REQUESTED IN O CHECK IF THIS IS A CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT: UNDER F.R.C.P. 23 DEMANDS CHECK YES only if dananded in complaint: JURY DEMAND: 3 Yes 3 No ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE & CORRECT TO 1 HE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE SIGNATUICas-Asill NEY OF RECORD DATE r ". 7- Ce 10 0410 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY AMOUNT 35D "P RECEIPT 7.21/031FP EFTA00067540