EFTA00068042.pdf

From: "I To:1 I)" „cl - - - li r, Subject: FW: Epstein investigation / Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 02:46:51 +0000 Importance: Normal Inline-Images: —WRD000.jpg; —WRD000(1).jpg It occurs to me that I don't often drag the agents to a reverse — I think they should absolutely come if they'd like, but not a necessity at all (and probably not a super high priority for them?) since the actual client won't be talking at all. But defer to you guys to get a sense from them whether they care one way or the other. From: Michael Bachner Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2019 22:43 To: Cc: Subject: Re: Epstein investigation an Hell= 6 o'clock is somewhat late. The client lives in Michael Bachner mr Bachner & Associates, PC ) < Please excuse typographical errors. Messages sent through dictation. https://www.actl.com/ NOTICE: The information contained in this communication is legally privileged and/or confidential information, which is intended only for use of recipient. If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient (or the agent or employee responsible to deliver it to the intended (recipient), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication by error, please immediately notify the sender by e-mail and delete this email from your system. Nothing in this email should be construed as a legal opinion or tax advice. On Jul 11, 2019, at 9:01 PM, > wrote: Michael, EFTA00068042 Would 7/16 at around 6pm work for the reverse proffer in our office at 1St. Andrews? Thanks, Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York I St. Andrew's Plaza New Vnrk NY 10007 From: Michael Bachner Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2019 12:26 PM To: Cc: ) Subject: Re: Epstein investigation <IMMair Regarding the reverse proffer, We are available next week from the 15-18. I have a 2 o'clock meeting in my office on the 16th and 17th that should last an hour. So I can meet with you on those days at 11 or 1030 in the morning if that works. Please let me know Michael Bachner Bachner & Associates. PC Please excuse typographical errors. Messages sent through dictation. https://www.actl.com/ NOTICE: The information contained in this communication is legally privileged and/or confidential information, which is intended only for use of recipient. If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient (or the agent or employee responsible to deliver it to the intended (recipient), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication by error, please immediately notify the sender by e-mail and delete this email from your system. Nothing in this email should be construed as a legal opinion or tax advice. EFTA00068043 On Jul 10, 2019, at 11:20 AM, Michael Bachner wrote: Sure. Michael Bachner Bachner & Associates, PC Please excuse typographical errors. Messages sent through dictation. https://www.actl.com/ NOTICE: The information contained in this communication is legally privileged and/or confidential information, which is intended only for use of recipient. If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient (or the agent or employee responsible to deliver it to the intended (recipient), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication by error, please immediately notify the sender by e-mail and delete this email from your system. Nothing in this email should be construed as a legal opinion or tax advice. On Jul 10, 2019, at 11:08 AM, wrote: Mike, I think it would be useful to get a better understanding of your position—it would be helpful for us to know, for example, how much time you propose to take to evaluate matters, and whether we can provide any additional information that might be useful for that process of evaluation. That likely will affect our determination regarding the grand jury appearance, at which we would expect, were we to call to ask her a number of questions we would expect to argue to the court do not implicate a fifth amendment privilege—i.e., that she couldn't simply blanket invoke. Would it be useful to discuss via phone? thanks, From: Michael Bachner Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2019 10:25 To: Cc: ) Subject: Re: Epstein investigation Dear Counsel: EFTA00068044 I met with and I need time to evaluate matter ng the subpoena to testify before the Grand Jury on we hereby notify you that if called as a witnes would invoke her Fifth Amendment privilege against compelled self-incrimination. Please let me know if you will require her to invoke in person or whether this communication suffices and no appertaining will be required. Yours truly, Michael Bachner Michael Bachner Bachner & Associates, PC Please excuse typographical errors. Messages sent through dictation. cWRD026.jpg> https://www.actl.com/ NOTICE: The information contained in this communication is legally privileged and/or confidential information, which is intended only for use of recipient. If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient (or the agent or employee responsible to deliver it to the intended (recipient), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication by error, please immediately notify the sender by e-mail and delete this email from your system. Nothing in this email should be construed as a legal opinion or tax advice. On Jul 9, 2019, at 11:43 AM, wrote: Mr. Bachner, Following up on our conversation earlier this morning, we wanted to provide you with the additional information and materials we discussed. In the first instance, so that you have full contact info for the team, please feel free to reach out to any of us at any time; we're all available via email or at the following phone numbers: Additionally, attached are the non-prosecution agreement, previously publicly filed in civil proceedings in Florida, and a blank version of our standard proffer agreement, both as discussed. As we mentioned, please don't hesitate to reach out with any questions, and we look forward to setting a time to speak again after you're able to confer with thank you, Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of New York EFTA00068045 <blank proffer agreement.pdf> <Epstein NPA, dated 2007-09-24.pdf> EFTA00068046