DOJ-OGR-00006628.jpg

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 444 Filed 11/12/21 Page2of21 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PRELIMINARY STATEMENT ..........cccecsecssesecssessesseseessessevscenevseesseseeaesaevsesaeestsnaeseesaeseeaeeateatens 1 BACKGROUND 1.0... ececeeceseseeseensesecnseseessesaeaecaevsecnsesecnsessesaesseaesseverenaeseenaeseesaesaevaeeneeetenaeneaeeatens 2 ARGUMENT .......ececeecesessesseseesseesevseenevsecnevscensessessessevsesaeveeenavseenaessesaesseaesaevseenevsesneeseesaeseesaesateatens 5 I. Popp Cae LAW sacs scsamenss avs a. eiseeva sme UA OVRESIE ARGON Sh SNA SNARES 1 SRSA SIME Hh ENTERS ACR wa ER 5 Il. Evidence Related to Accuser-3 Is Not Proof of the Charged Conspiracies... 7 I. Evidence Related to Accuser-3 Is Not Admissible Under Rule 404(b) and Should be Hecloclied, Winter Rite: 40% va. sccsse ss avenes sncemeies in vores same wa So REO SEA NS NRE HA 10 IV. In the Alternative, the Court Should Preclude the Government and Accuser-3 from Representing that Accuser-3 Was a “Minor,” or that She Was “Sexually Abused” by Epstein, and Give the Jury an Appropriate Limiting Instruction.............c:ceeceeeeeeeeees 14 CONCLUSION 0... eececseeensesscnsesecsseesecnevsecneeseesaeseesaesaesaesnevseenaeseensessesaesaeaesaeesrenaeseenaesnesaesaeeaeenees 16 DOJ-OGR-00006628