EFTA00073488.pdf
PDF Source (No Download)
Extracted Text (OCR)
From: '
To:"
Cc: '
>
Subject: RE: 302s / interview notes
Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 12:22:34 +0000
Attachments: 2018-12-04
interview_302,_Identifying_Information.pdf; 2019-07-
°8, Jean_Luc_Brunelinterview_302.pdf; Epstein_Interview_Tracker_(Last_Updated_5-
22-2020)_a.xlsx
The spreadsheet is updated with everything in
email. In terms of notes, the only three that are missing/not
been covered are the following:
-
Jean Luc Brunel, 2019-07-08
2018-12-04
For ease of reference, I've attached the corresponding 302s for each of these interviews.
Apart from that, we appear to be all covered in terms of 302s/notes.
From:
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2020 8:25 PM
To:
Cc:
Subject: RE: 302s / interview notes
Ok sorry for the delay.
For
there is only the attachment; no notes were taken for the 302 authored by
Yes, the 302 regarding= is just the short notes along with the invoice.
There were no notes for
M
.
I
apologize for the confusion in labeling that attached.
Ok I figured out the
confusion. The
because he was present for the interview with
it's reflected in the 302.
interview is attached.
From:
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2020 3:07 PM
To:
Cc:
Subject: RE: 302s / interview notes
is listed at the top
This is really helpful, and I think we're down to the last few. A couple follow-up questions / clarifications —
For
}, I don't think we received notes from 7/6/19 — the attachments included a copy of
ID but not any writing. It's possible there weren't other written notes — the 302, attached, is very short — but just let
us know either way?
EFTA00073488
Similarly, just want to confirm that the notes for I=
are just the short contact info notes, with his attorney info and a
property invoice — both the notes and the 302 are attached for reference. I think that's right but just want to confirm.
I also didn't see notes for
though let us know if it's in a longer write-up in one of the files or if we otherwise
missed it, that's also totally possible.
And just a clarification, it looks like the other attached document is listed as
interview," which I assume is
? It also has the name 'M=r'
(?) at the top, which may be where that confusion comes from — I
know you were looking into that. I think both those names just show up on that one doc.
Also totally happy to chat via phone if that's easiest to run through these. Thanks again!
From:
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 13:47
To:
Cc: la
Subject: RE: 302s / interview notes
Hi all,
I've attached the notes you've requested. I've also attached
302 and notes; that interview was not in
the batch we gave you. You'll see below where I've typed "attached" to reflect what notes we have. Interviews where
this is not written simply meant there were no notes to attach likely because the interview/contact was brief (I double
checked all to be sure). Let me know if there is anything else you come across that we've missed sending.
Also, could you send over the notes from the last two phone interviews with
and
. Just want to make sure
we have them on our end.
Thanks,
From:
Sent: Friday, May 08, 2020 6:52 PM
To:
Cc:
Subject: RE: 302s / interview notes
sa
Thanks very much again for getting us so many 302s recently, we really appreciate it. Collectively, there have been more
than 120 interviews in this case, which is incredible. We've now completed a full review and cross-reference of all our
materials, so wanted to address a handful of loose ends. In terms of reports, I think currently we're down to only missing
three, all of which we have interview notes for but no 302s:
EFTA00073489
And then there are a larger number of interviews where we have a 302 but not hand-written notes. My guess is that for
some of these, and possibly most, there aren't notes because the "interviews" were so short that they just got typed up,
but we wanted to check. Also most of them were interviews conducted by other agents (where it was agents other than
one or both of you, I've indicated below). But if you could please double check to see if there are interview notes for the
following, and in particular the few that are in bold? And let us know if any questions or issues. They are:
Thanks again!
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Southern District of New York
EFTA00073490
Document Preview
PDF source document
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.
Extracted Information
Document Details
| Filename | EFTA00073488.pdf |
| File Size | 132.3 KB |
| OCR Confidence | 85.0% |
| Has Readable Text | Yes |
| Text Length | 4,296 characters |
| Indexed | 2026-02-11T10:25:44.269590 |