EFTA00074684.pdf

From: To: ' Cc: " Subject: RE: 302s / interview notes Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 18:43:24 +0000 Makes sense on both, and thanks. From: Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2020 14:00 To: Cc: > Subject: Re: 302s / interview notes Hope you all had a nice weekend! >; I won't be in the office until later this week so I'll double check on these for you. I don't believe there are notes for but will double check. As for , that one is puzzling. The pdf is coming up that it is associated to the Miami case file but giving a 2018 date. I can say that neither or I wrote it. Could be a glitch but I will look into that a little more. I'll get back to you on this. From: Sent: Friday, May 22, 2020 6:35 PM To: Cc: Subject: RE: 302s / interview notes thanks very much for helping us to track all of this stuff down! We've reviewed our records and I think are down to questions on just two, where we have 302s (attached) but not underlying notes: The one is a little puzzling — we have a 302 and notes from when we met with. in October 2019, and before that the prior FBI interviews with were in 2006 and 2007 — but neither of those 302s include the info in the attached report, which has the date of 12/04/18 ... but that could just be the date generated in the report when it got called up in your system, there's no date in the actual text. I don't recall us interviewing in 2018, but I could be wrong! Anyway let us know what you think. And for it was a quick interview at his office so there may not be retained notes, but just double-checking. Thanks again and have a good weekend! EFTA00074684 From: Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2020 20:25 To: Cc: Subject: RE: 302s / interview notes Ok sorry for the delay. For there is only the attachment; no notes were taken for the 302 authored by Yes, the 302 regarding= is just the short notes along with the invoice. There were no notes for M . I apologize for the confusion in labeling that attached. Ok I figured out the confusion. The because he was present for the interview with • it's reflected in the 302. interview is attached. From: Sent: Friday, May 15, 2020 3:07 PM To: Cc: Subject: RE: 302s / interview notes is listed at the top This is really helpful, and I think we're down to the last few. A couple follow-up questions / clarifications — For ), I don't think we received notes from 7/6/19 — the attachments included a copy of ID but not any writing. It's possible there weren't other written notes — the 302, attached, is very short — but just let us know either way? Similarly, just want to confirm that the notes for I= are just the short contact info notes, with IN attorney info and a property invoice — both the notes and the 302 are attached for reference. I think that's right but just want to confirm. I also didn't see notes for S though let us know if it's in a longer write-up in one of the files or if we otherwise missed it, that's also totally possible. And just a clarification, it looks like the other attached document is listed as interview," which I assume is M? It also has the name ta' (?) at the top, which may be where that confusion comes from — I know you were looking into that. I think both those names just show up on that one doc. Also totally happy to chat via phone if that's easiest to run through these. Thanks again! From: Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 13:47 To: Cc: Subject: RE: 302s / interview notes EFTA00074685 Hi all, I've attached the notes you've requested. I've also attached 302 and notes; that interview was not in the batch we gave you. You'll see below where I've typed "attached" to reflect what notes we have. Interviews where this is not written simply meant there were no notes to attach likely because the interview/contact was brief (I double checked all to be sure). Let me know if there is anything else you come across that we've missed sending. Also, could you send over the notes from the last two phone interviews with and ? Just want to make sure we have them on our end. Thanks, From: Sent: Friday, May 08, 2020 6:52 PM To: Cc: l a >; Subject: RE: 302s / interview notes sa Thanks very much again for getting us so many 302s recently, we really appreciate it. Collectively, there have been more than 120 interviews in this case, which is incredible. We've now completed a full review and cross-reference of all our materials, so wanted to address a handful of loose ends. In terms of reports, I think currently we're down to only missing three, all of which we have interview notes for but no 302s: And then there are a larger number of interviews where we have a 302 but not hand-written notes. My guess is that for some of these, and possibly most, there aren't notes because the "interviews" were so short that they just got typed up, but we wanted to check. Also most of them were interviews conducted by other agents (where it was agents other than one or both of you, I've indicated below). But if you could please double check to see if there are interview notes for the following, and in particular the few that are in bold? And let us know if any questions or issues. They are: EFTA00074686 Thanks again! M Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of New York EFTA00074687