EFTA00078454.pdf

From: Cc: Subject: RE: Emailing: n20190813121118079_DRAFT.pdf Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 18:01:19 +0000 My preference would be to eliminate Custody of a defendant during a federal criminal case is determined by the Court and is managed by the United States Marshal Service. Custody status of a defendant is subject to change during the course of the criminal proceedings. To receive the timeliest update to your case, please provide and verify your email address, as instructed below. As of August 10, 2019, Jeffrey Epstein is not in the custody of the U.S. Marshal Service. The defendant is deceased. And simply say: On August 10, 2019, Jeffrey Epstein died while in custody at the Manhattan Correctional Center. Or something to that effect. Is that doable? From: Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2019 1:15 PM To: Subject: RE: Emailing: 20190813121118079_DRAFT.pdf Yes, this is the draft notificatioa sent us. Totally recognize it's a BOP issue—I would guess it says USMS because I think up until a defendant is sentenced the defendant is technically in USMS custody, and the marshals elect to house the defendants through BOP. But I don't have a view at all on what the letter should say about that. From: Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2019 1:11 PM To: E s; Cc: Subject: RE: Emailing: X20190813121118079_DRAFT.pdf >; This is a proposed draft notification? If so, I definitely have edits, among them being I don't think we can refer to the USMS, I think this is a BOP issue. From: Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2019 12:25 PM To: Cc: Subject: FW: Emailing: ).; ■ 20190813121118079_DRAFT.pdf —just wanted to check to see if you were okay with this. Thanks. EFTA00078454 From: Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2019 12:12 PM To: Subject: Emailing 20190813121118079_DRAFT.pdf This came up in the VNS system. What do you want to do. >; EFTA00078455