EFTA00087354.pdf
PDF Source (No Download)
Extracted Text (OCR)
From: Man McDona
To
Subject: The Spectator - Prince Andrew story
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 15:12:17 +0000
Dea
l
Our writer Dominic Green has written about Prince Andrew's correspondence with the Southern District of New
York, and how it is being characterized by Geoffrey Berman.
I was wondering whether you would be prepared to comment on the following excerpts from Mr Green's story.
He attempted to contact the press office earlier today but was not able to get through to anyone:
'Berman has actively misled the global media and the global audience, 'my source alleges. 'The Duke's legal
team has dozens of email exchanges with the Southern District, proving that there has been full cooperation.'
On January 27, Berman denounced the Duke from the steps ofEpstein's Manhattan townhouse. Berman
claimed to be facing a 'wall of silence' and 'zero co-operation 'from Andrew. But this, my source tells me,
wasn't true: 'Berman must have known we had an email trail.'
***
...the DOJ made no effort to contact Prince Andrew durin Je re E stein's lifitime. Only after Epstein's death
in August 2019 and the BBC's broadcast o
accusations in November 2019, did the
DOJ approach the Prince — not as a suspect, but as a witness.
'The lawyers responded immediately,' I'm told. In early January, the Prince's new legal team suggested that
they draft a proposal for how Andrew would deliver his witness statement. The DOJ, my source reports,
accepted this approach.
Although the DOJ wanted to talk with Andrew as a witness, Berman seemed to imply that Andrew had aided
Epstein's crimes: Epstein couldn't have done what he did without the assistance of others.' This, I'm told, was
an 'overt breach of the DOJ:s own rules on how to engage with witnesses, and the need to maintain privacy
and confidentiality'.
After Berman's attack in January, there was a every frank exchange of views' between Andrew's lawyers and the
Southern District. But Andrew's team played by the rules and didn t release entails that would prove they were
negotiating with the Southern District in good faith.
We plan to publish the story at 3pm ET, but can update the story to include any response. If this request for
comment should be directed towards your press office, I'd appreciate it if you could pass it onto them - there is
EFTA00087354
no way of contacting them on the SDNY site as their mailbox is full and no one is in the office.
Yours sincerely,
Matt McDonald
Matt McDonald
Managing Editor The Spectator US
YID
EFTA00087355
Document Preview
PDF source document
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.
Document Details
| Filename | EFTA00087354.pdf |
| File Size | 91.7 KB |
| OCR Confidence | 85.0% |
| Has Readable Text | Yes |
| Text Length | 2,537 characters |
| Indexed | 2026-02-11T10:30:47.866135 |