EFTA00091238.pdf

From: ' To:' )"H Subject: RE: Epstein Victim Impact Statements Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 17:48:04 +0000 - 15 Edwards clients present (and "at least 20 more who didn't make this hearing today for a multitude of reasons"), at 29 c. Jane Doe 1 o Jane Doe 2 o Jane Doe 3 o Jane Doe 4 o Jane Doe 5 0 (via letter) (ending at 48) 5 Boies clients present 0 (62) Lisa Bloom clients, four victims, three statements read into the record o Jane Doe 6 (64) o Jane Doe 7 o Jane Doe 8 Allred clients, two in person and three statements read o (74) o Jane Doe (75) o Jane Doe (76) (present in court for reading of statement) o Jane Doe (78) (not present in court for reading of statement) o Jane Doe (84) (not present in court for reading of statement) From: (USANYS) Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2019 13:06 To: Cc: (USANYS) Subject: FW: Epstein Victim Impact Statements Importance: High (USANYS) Are we able to answer these questions for ODAG quickly? I am sure we can answer the second, and maybe the first — not sure about the third. From: (ODAG) Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2019 12:53 PM To: (USANYS) EFTA00091238 Cc: (C)DAG)": Subject: Epstein Victim Impact Statements Importance: High The Petitioner in the Epstein CVRA case has filed an appeal to the 11th Circuit. One of their issues is the District Court's refusal to hold a hearing allowing the Epstein victims to "have their day in court." The Court's ruling is, in part, on the basis that a hearing held in SDNY satisfied this request. The Petitioner has alleged that not all of the Epstein victims who wanted to speak were able to do so at the New York hearing because they did not have sufficient notice and were unable to travel to NY. Can your office provide us some details about the following: 1) how many victims were contacted about making a victim impact statement; 2) how many victims were able to travel and make an in-person victim impact statement; and 3) how many victims indicated they wanted to make a victim impact statement but were unable to do so given the notice/timing of the hearing? Please provide as much of this information as possible today. I'm very sorry for the quick turnaround but the Department's response to the mandamus petition is due tomorrow. I really appreciate your assistance. National Coordinator for Child Exploitation Prevention & Interdiction Office of the De ut Attorney General Direct: EFTA00091239