DOJ-OGR-00006983.jpg

be N Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO WO a oO = be N Ww = Hs Oo a OY a ~] a oO a Ke) 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE LalWmaxC let me say that those matters I think w Document 459 hav Filed 11/15/21 of the questionnaire but for purposes of the oral Do you agree with that, Ms. Pomerantz? MS. POMERANTZ: Yes, agree with that, THE COURT: OK. Anything else you want to raise based on the process I've described so far? MS. POMERANTZ: No. Thank you, your Honor. THE COURT: Ms. Sternheim. MS. STERNHEIM: Thank you, Judge. While we appreciat at a time, I don't think need to be dealt with Page 11 of 43 time to resolve that because for purposes voir dire. issues being raised in the other people in the public would like ide EK COURT: to know how the Well, are sometimes instances in might be required, but what the issue is or what the specific concern is, I don't know that can address it writ large. F you want to give an example, I'm happy to hear that. MS. STERNHEIM: Sure. With regard to personal experience that may have bearing on the subject matter of the charges, that is particularly sensitive information. I think that it has a SOUTHERN D the questioning of presence O1 who may have access to your Honor. the jurors one we do have a concern with regard to very sensitive fF media and other public, this. Court is going to handle that. I think, which something slight] I guess without as in any voir dire, there y different STRIC I REPORT BRS, PseG. (212) 805-0300 t knowing specifically 11 DOJ-OGR-00006983