DOJ-OGR-00006994.jpg

be N Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO WO a oO = be N Ww = Hs Oo a OY a ~] a oO a Ke) 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE LalWmaxC any prejudice analysis An is. questions in advance, d No. 2, Document 459 I'm still Tf you have a grade school To th xt questionnaires because it's reported in they will have to trutht and the voir dire process. any way, seeing as a result of nt we hav you surely have some sort of a juror who has some awareness of Filed 11/15/21 fully tell that. Page 22 of 43 22 from other materials on the docket. failing to see what the prejudice l math test and you get the advantage. the the media in some way, us that We would b in the questionnaire abl to explore that in and it's just unclear to me what prejudice you're T'll hear you on those two points. I think this is an the Court for which has MS. STERNHEIM: Your Honor, extraordinary case, and there has been no ability or the government and certainly not the defense to control any of the vast media coverage in this case, significantly prejudiced our client. While things are placed on the public record, rightly so, Giving jurors the opportunit they can decide what motivated to want to sit on this jury this is a situa they come to court to fill out all answers I think that tion that is somewhat di and ferent. ty to view the questionnaire before fill it out is like a take-home exam and the answers and do all the research and t there's an oppor some of which I have expressed in other SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, (212) 805-0300 they want to put on those papers. tunity for people to be for a variety of reasons, filings that have been P a Gus DOJ-OGR-00006994