EFTA00098826.pdf
PDF Source (No Download)
Extracted Text (OCR)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF YORK
x
RADAR ONLINE LLC and JAMES
ROBERSON,
Plaintiffs,
-v-
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION,
Defendant.
x
17 Civ. 3956 (PGG)
DECLARATION OF
hereby declare as follows:
1.
I am an Assistant United States Attorney in the United States Attorney's
Office for the Southern District of New York ("USAO-SDNY") and currently serve as Co-
Chief of the Violent and Organized Crime Unit. I have served in this capacity since May
2021. Prior to my current role, I served as Deputy Chief of the Violent and Organized
Crime Unit of the USAO-SDNY from February 2021 through May 2021, an Assistant
United States Attorney in the Public Corruption Unit of the USAO-SDNY from September
2019 through February 2021, an Assistant United States Attorney in the Violent and
Organized Crime Unit of the USAO-SDNY from July 2017 through September 2019, an
Assistant United States Attorney in the White Plains Division of the USAO-SDNY from
January 2016 through July 2017, and an Assistant United States Attorney in the General
Crimes Unit of the USAO-SDNY from November 2015 through January 2016. I have
been an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York since
1
EFTA00098826
November 2015. Currently, I am one of the Assistant United States Attorneys handling the
prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell, an individual who associated with Jeffrey Epstein. Prior
to his death, I was also one of the Assistant United States Attorneys in charge of the
prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein.
2.
I am familiar with the Freedom of Information Act request filed by Radar
Online LLC (the "FOIA Request") that is the subject of this case, which seeks records
relating to the "FBI's investigation and the prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein, who plead guilty
to one count of felony solicitation of prosecution in August 2006." By either reviewing
certain records in preparation for the prosecution or review of samples of all of the
categories of documents, I am familiar with the responsive records that the Federal Bureau
of Investigation ("FBI") has withheld pursuant to Exemptions 3, 5, 6, 7(A), 7(C), 7(D), and
7(E) of FOIA, 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(5)-(7). In addition, I am familiar with the proceedings in
United States v. Maxwell, 20-cr-330 (AJN) (S.D.N.Y.), and United States v. Epstein, No.
19-cr-490 (RMB) (S.D.N.Y.). The statements contained in this declaration are based on
my personal knowledge, documents maintained in the files of the USAO-SDNY,
documents maintained in the files of the FBI, conversations with the members of the
Maxwell and Epstein prosecution teams at the USAO-SDNY, conversations with FBI
employees, public court filings, and conclusions made in accordance therewith.
3.
I submit this declaration in support of the FBI's motion for summary
judgment in this case.
The Prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein
4.
On July 2, 2019, Jeffrey Epstein was indicted by a federal grand jury in the
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on one count of
2
EFTA00098827
conspiracy to commit sex trafficking, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and one count of sex
trafficking, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1591(a), (b)(2). United States v. Epstein, No. 19
Cr. 490 (RMB) (S.D.N.Y.), Dkt. No. 2. Epstein passed away on August 10, 2019. Id.,
Dkt. No. 44.
5.
On August 29, 2019, following a public hearing on August 27, 2019, Judge
Berman entered an order of nolle prosequi dismissing the charges against Epstein. See id.,
Nolle Prosequi, Dkt. No. 52.
The Prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell
6.
On June 29, 2020, Ghislaine Maxwell was indicted by a grand jury in the
Southern District of New York with one count of conspiracy to entice minors to travel to
engage in illegal sex acts, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, one count of enticement of a
minor to travel to engage in illegal sex acts, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2422 and 2, one
count of conspiracy to transport minors with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity, in
violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, one count of transportation of a minor with intent to engage in
criminal sexual activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2423(a) and 2, and two counts of
perjury, in violation 18 U.S.C. 1623. See United States v. Maxwell, No. 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
(S.D.N.Y.), Dkt. No. 1.
7.
On March 29, 2021, a grand jury in the Southern District of New York
returned a superseding indictment charging Ghislaine Maxwell with one count of
conspiracy to entice minors to travel to engage in illegal sex acts, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
§ 371, one count of enticement of a minor to travel to engage in illegal sex acts, in violation
of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2422 and 2, one count of conspiracy to transport minors with intent to
engage in criminal sexual activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, one count of
3
EFTA00098828
transportation of a minor with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity, in violation of 18
U.S.C. §§ 2423(a) and 2, one count of sex trafficking conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
§ 371, one count of sex trafficking of a minor, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1591 and 2, and
two counts of perjury, in violation 18 U.S.C. 1623. See id., Dkt. No. 187.
8.
The Maxwell case is pending before the Honorable Alison J. Nathan.
Trial has been scheduled to start on November 29, 2021. See id., Dkt. No. 277.
Records Withheld from Disclosure Pursuant to FOIA 7(A) on Account of Likely
Interference with the Prosecution of Maxwell
9.
5 U.S.C. § 522 (b)(7)(A) ("Exemption 7(A)") exempts from disclosure
"records or information compiled for law enforcement purposes, but only to the extent that
the production of such law enforcement records or information ... could reasonably be
expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings . . . ."
10.
I and the prosecutors responsible for the Maxwell prosecution are
familiar with the records responsive to the FOIA requests withheld in full or in part under
Exemption 7(A), including those reflected on the index prepared by the FBI and the
declaration of Michael G. Seidel (the "FBI index"). All of these records fall within the
scope of Exemption 7(A).
11.
Public disclosure of the records withheld in full or in part under
Exemption 7(A) could reasonably be expected to interfere with the pending prosecution of
Maxwell. The records include:
(i) Interview Forms, Reports, and Notes: These documents consist of the FBI's
personnel's handwritten interview notes and forms containing notes of
interviews of individuals, including victims, as well as reports of interviews of
individuals, including victims;
4
EFTA00098829
(ii) Federal Grand Jury Subpoenas and Subpoenaed Information: These
documents consist of federal grand July subpoenas and documents collected as a
result of those subpoenas.
(iii) Other Investigative and Enforcement Documents: These documents include
various types of documents provided by state and local law enforcement
agencies, including evidence vouchers and background information for
witnesses, including victim-witnesses, and subjects of the investigation;
communications between the FBI and other government agencies regarding the
investigation; communications within the FBI regarding the investigation;
organizational documents such as envelopes used to organize and store
documents and other evidentiary documents, bulky exhibit cover sheets,
transmittal forms, and letter routing slips, some of which contain the names of
witnesses, including victim-witnesses, and subjects of the investigation;
background and contact information regarding witnesses, including victim-
witnesses, and subjects of the investigation; and internet printouts, including of
material relating to victim-witnesses. These records document information and
evidence gathered during an FBI investigation, the sources from and techniques
through which such information and evidence was gathered, methods used to
obtain the information and evidence, the manner in which information is
organized, the methods used to analyze the information and evidence, witnesses,
including victim-witnesses and subjects of the investigation, and the focus of the
investigation.
5
EFTA00098830
12.
Providing more detailed public descriptions of the withheld documents
and how their release would interfere with the Maxwell prosecution would itself risk
interfering with the Max-well prosecution. For example, public disclosure of more detailed
descriptions of the documents anticipated to be proffered as exhibits at trial, or that bear on
other trial exhibits, would disclose elements of the Government's trial strategy in Maxwell,
including its selection of trial exhibits and the anticipated content of witness testimony.
More detailed public descriptions could also prematurely disclose how the prosecution
team expects the trial to proceed, and may impact the weight jurors give certain evidence,
in relation to other evidence that will not be used at trial but would be described or
disclosed through this FOIA action.
13.
Greater Access: Pursuant to its obligations under Federal Rule of
Criminal Procedure 16, as well as Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and directives
from the District Court, the Government has provided Maxwell's counsel with discoverable
and potentially exculpatory materials from these records. These productions include,
among other things, documents that the Government may seek to introduce as exhibits at
trial, as well as statements and background information regarding witnesses the
Government does not intend to call to testify at trial but whom the defense may wish to call
as witnesses. These productions have all been subject to a Protective Order, entered by
Judge Nathan, which prohibits the defense from disseminating Government productions to
the public or the press. See Maxwell, No. 20 Cr. 330, Dkt. No. 36. Additionally, the Court
has ordered the Government to disclose to the defense all testifying witness statements,
material subject to disclosure pursuant to Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972), and
a list of proposed trial exhibits by October 11, 2021. See id., Dkt. No. 297. Those
6
EFTA00098831
productions will similarly be made pursuant to the Protective Order governing disclosures
in the Maxwell case. Release of the entirety of the records at issue in this litigation will
allow Maxwell earlier or greater access to agency investigatory files than she otherwise
would have through the criminal discovery process.
14.
Influence by Media upon Witnesses and Jury: The risks of interference
with the Maxwell proceedings are heightened by the media coverage of the prosecution of
Maxwell and her association with Epstein. The parties in the Maxwell matter are aware
that media coverage may impact potential witnesses and jurors, and as such, the parties
have entered into the above-referenced Protective Order to allow the Government to
produce discovery material, including witness lists and exhibits prior to trial, without
disclosure of that information to the public. Thus, to allow disclosure of records withheld
in full or in part by the FBI under Exemption 7(A) would be in contravention of the efforts
made by the parties and the Court to provide an impartial trial. Further, premature release
of the withheld records, particularly if the records are released in part or without full
context, may influence the perception of jurors who have been exposed to media coverage
containing speculation and theories relating to Maxwell.
15.
Impact on Potential Witnesses: Premature disclosure of the records
and/or the information contained therein could reasonably be expected to influence
witnesses' potential testimony at trial. These records include information about which
witnesses may be expected to testify at trial, include details that are not publicly known or
known to other witnesses, and include information and documents authored by potential
trial witnesses. These records also include potential trial exhibits that the Government
anticipates will be entered into evidence, many of which the potential trial witnesses have
7
EFTA00098832
not seen. The premature release of these materials could influence the testimony of
witnesses by providing the opportunity for witnesses to shape their testimony to conform
with other evidence gathered during the investigation. In order to preserve the independent
integrity of its witnesses' testimony, the Government has worked to ensure that its
witnesses are not exposed to other parts of its investigative file, the accounts of other
witnesses, or the full scope of exhibits it intends to offer at trial. The release of these
materials would undermine the Government's efforts to present witness testimony that is
uninfluenced by exposure to other evidence in the case and can therefore be independently
corroborated by other witness accounts and exhibits at trial.
16.
The FBI's interview notes and forms contain statements made by
potential witnesses and individuals that may influence a witness to conform his or her
testimony to other evidence or witness statements. Additionally, premature release of the
FBI's interview notes and forms could prevent counsel in Maxwell from effectively
questioning witnesses in a manner that would allow jurors to assess their credibility
because the witnesses may have already viewed records that counsel may use for
impeachment purposes. Similarly, release of records pertaining to grand jury subpoenas
and information received from grand jury subpoenas will allow potential witnesses to
consider specific evidence and the volume of evidence prior to trial, which may influence
their testimony. Especially because the Maxwell prosecution has received significant
media attention, it is highly likely that the media will convey any released records relating
to potential witnesses in a manner that will attract attention, which will also potentially
influence witnesses. Further, release of the records relating to potential witnesses may
8
EFTA00098833
permit members of the media and the public to question witnesses about certain records or
information, or possibly subject witnesses to harassment or intimidation.
17.
Impact on Jury: Premature public disclosure of the records withheld
under Exemption 7(A), including those which the Government anticipates will be entered
into evidence at trial could reasonably be expected to impair the Government's (and the
defendant's) ability to seat a fair and impartial jury in Maxwell. These records include
possible trial exhibits, specific information about witnesses who are expected to testify at
trial, as well as information and documents authored by potential trial witnesses, such that
premature public disclosure could reasonably be expected to influence potential jurors'
perceptions of the witnesses and the evidence to be presented at trial.
18.
Conversely, potential jurors' consideration of the records that are being
withheld under Exemption 7(A) but will not be presented at trial may impact the
consideration jurors give to the actual evidence. If some or all of this evidence is excluded
at trial, pre-trial publication of these materials would risk exposing potential jurors to
material they would otherwise not be shown during trial, which risks unduly influencing
jurors' views of the case and would impair the Government's (and the defendant's) ability
to seat a fair and impartial jury.
19.
For example, should potential jurors be able to view the FBI's interview
notes and forms and grand jury subpoenas, they will know who the FBI contacted during its
investigation, information that was disclosed by witnesses, including witnesses who will
not testify at trial, and the evidence that was gathered by the FBI. Having viewed that
evidence, jurors may improperly consider this information in conjunction with the actual
evidence that is presented at trial.
9
EFTA00098834
20.
Similarly, records that may not be trial exhibits but bear on the contents
of potential trial exhibits could improperly influence potential jurors' understanding of the
evidence at trial and the case overall.
21.
For example, records used to identify or catalog evidence would reveal to
potential jurors the evidence in the Government's possession and potentially the date such
evidence was obtained. Similarly, transmittal forms or routing slips may contain the names
of witnesses or timeframe during which the FBI was in focused on a specific individual.
Records containing communications with other government agencies may reveal the
sources of information and may cause jurors to give more or less weight to certain
evidence. In addition, release of these records may cause jurors to speculate about the
evidence that will be used at trial and cause them to alter their views of the evidence
presented at trial.
22.
Impact on Investigations: Furthermore, release of this information would
identify the FBI's investigative interest in particular individuals; identify and tip off
individuals who are of interest to law enforcement; and provide subjects or targets the
opportunity to destroy evidence and/or alter their behavior to avoid detection. Thus,
release of this information may interfere with any potential future prosecutions.
Segregability
23.
The records withheld in full under Exemption 7(A) are exempt from
disclosure in their entirety under Exemption 7(A). To the extent the records contain any
non-exempt information, such information is inextricably intertwined with information that
could reasonably be expected to interfere with the Maxwell prosecution for the reasons
discussed above. The media coverage of speculation and theories about Maxwell's
10
EFTA00098835
association with Epstein makes the segregation of any possibly non-exempt information
particularly difficult because providing information pertaining to Epstein without complete
context can reasonably be expected to contribute to the dissemination of speculation and
theories about the Maxwell case. This, in turn, could reasonably be expected to interfere
with the District Court's ability to seat a fair and impartial jury in proceedings against
Maxwell, for the reasons discussed above.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing
is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Executed this 27th day of June 2021.
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney's Office for the
Southern District of New York
11
EFTA00098836
Document Preview
PDF source document
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.
Extracted Information
Document Details
| Filename | EFTA00098826.pdf |
| File Size | 611.3 KB |
| OCR Confidence | 85.0% |
| Has Readable Text | Yes |
| Text Length | 18,702 characters |
| Indexed | 2026-02-11T10:37:02.988406 |