EFTA00099669.pdf
PDF Source (No Download)
Extracted Text (OCR)
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject: RE: OPR
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 19:59:53 +0000
Got it, thanks. I'll just plan to note in the cover letter that the report is publicly available, but we are producing a copy to
the defense as a courtesy.
From:
Sent: Monday, February 1, 20212:58 PM
To:
Cc:
Subject: RE: OPR
Sorry for the multiple emails, but one final point on this — OPR is asking that we not affirmatively accuse Congress of
leaking/releasing the report but simply say that it is publicly available or the press has gotten a copy or something like
that. Happy to review the cover letter if that would be helpful.
From:
Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 2:08 PM
To:
Cc:
Subject: RE: OPR
Makes sense, thanks.
From:
Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 2:07 PM
To:
>;
Cc:
Subject: RE: OPR
I think that's fine, although I would definitely note in producing it that you are doing so as a courtesy since it is widely
available and has been since November 2020, so they can't argue we sandbagged them by not producing it until after
they filed their motion.
>;
From:
Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 2:05 PM
To:
Cc:
Subject: RE: OPR
Great, thanks very much,. In that case, it seems to me we can go ahead and produce a copy to defense counsel and
note in our cover letter that the report is also publicly available.
From:
Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 1:32 PM
To:
>;
Cc:
Subject: OPR
>;
>;
EFTA00099669
Team — Good news. I spoke with OPR which confirmed that is fully report, not just the executive summary, is publicly
available. They even pointed me toward a few places where we could find it (links below). For drafting purposes, we
should avoid saying OPR publicly released its full report, since OPR did not. Instead, OPR provided its full report to
Congress which chose to release it, so a more accurate statement would read along the lines of "OPR's full report, which is
now publicly available" or something like that. Given that it's already publicly available, I think we can just cite to it as it
appears online:
https://int.nyt.com/data/documenttools/justice-department-review-jeffreyspstein/41cla927e0acff76/full.pdf
https://www.washingtonpost.com/context/read-the-report-investigation-into-the-u-s-attorney-s-office-for-the-southern-
district-of-florida-s-resolution-of-its-2006-2008-federal-criminal-investigation-of-jeffrey-epstein-and-its-interactions-with-
victims-during-the-investigation/db9373e8-22f8-4712-b4a7-be844d162de0/
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/7327894-DOJ-Epstein-Report.html?sidebar=false
https://www.scribd.comidocument/484513037/Dept-of-Justice-Jeffrey-Epstein-Plea-Deal-Investigation
U.S. Attorney's Office for the
Southern District of New York
Tel.
EFTA00099670
Document Preview
PDF source document
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.
Extracted Information
Document Details
| Filename | EFTA00099669.pdf |
| File Size | 84.1 KB |
| OCR Confidence | 85.0% |
| Has Readable Text | Yes |
| Text Length | 2,738 characters |
| Indexed | 2026-02-11T10:37:08.470385 |