EFTA00100327.pdf
PDF Source (No Download)
Extracted Text (OCR)
From: Andrew Patel
To:
(USANYS)"
Cc: Jill Shellow
Don Yannella
'1
11
Subject: Re:
Epstein
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2019 14:07:37 +0000
Just to be clear.
1. Your Ian
Ian is to turn over the redacted notes to the defendants and counsel. Additionally you plan to provide
' name on an AEO basis. If I have that right, we will revise the letter.
2. You are agreeing to wait on disclosing this material until after Judge Torres rules on our application. Again, we
will revise the letter to reflect that.
3. We will make that modification to the letter that this is a disclosure to the defense not the public.
Thanks
Andy
Andrew G. Patel
Attorney at Law
Sent from my phone
On Dec 26, 2019, at 8:39 AM,
Andy,
Three issues:
(USANYS) `t
i==>
wrote:
I. We plan to produce the redacted notes to the defense pursuant to the protective order, and the name on an
AEO basis to defense counsel. Your letter states that both will be provided on an AEO, which misstates our
intention.
2. When we discussed this, we understood that this would not be submitted to defense counsel prior to Judge
Torres ruling on your request. There is no language in the letter to that effect, and it seems appropriate to add
it.
3. Please add "to the defense" in the first letter to make clear to the Court that you are intervening in our
production of discovery to defense counsel in this matter (and not, for instance, in a disclosure to the public or
any other entity).
Thanks.
EFTA00100327
On Dec 25, 2019, at 10:25 AM, Andrew Patel a
wrote:
We have attached a copy (draft) of our letter to Judge Torres. Please let me know your thoughts. We would
like to get this to Judge Torres or if she is not available, the Part I Judge, tomorrow.
Sony to bother you during a holiday,
Andy
Andrew G. Patel
Attorney at Law
From:
(USANYS)
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2019 6:36 PM
To: Andrew Patel la
Cc: Jill Shellow a;
Don Yannella <
1.›;
Subject: RE:
/Epstein
Andy,
We cannot agree to these redactions, and think it would be appropriate for you to file a motion before Judge Torres,
under seal and copying the Government (but ex parte as to the defense). Could you please send us a copy of the letter
before you file it, so that we can ensure that our position is accurately represented? Thanks very much.
-----Original Message----
From: Andrew Patel 4IMIlle
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2019 5:14 PM
To:
(USANYS)
Cc: Jill Shellow
Subject: RE:-'Epstein
; Andrew Patel
We have attached a proposed disclosure cover letter that is modeled on a letter sent by the Government in United States
v. Madonna, 17 Cr. 89 (CS). We have also attached proposed redacted disclosures. As you and I discussed, we offer
this as a means to ensure our client's safety while permitting the Government to comply with what you believe are your
disclosure obligations.
As an alternative, we are willing to apply under seal to Judge Torres for a Protective Order to preclude the disclosure.
Our client is not a witness, and so this is not 3500 material, nor is it Rule 16 material. We do not believe that this is in
fact Brady material, but rather is an error made by our client that we understand is contradicted by the surveillance
video evidence. While we applaud your efforts, we have an obligation to make sure that our client is not harmed by the
possible release of the fact that he met with your Office.
We understand that you have time constraints. Please let us know how you want to proceed so that we can file a motion
EFTA00100328
before Judge Torres promptly if that is necessary.
Andy
Andrew G. Patel
Attorney at Law
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18
U.S.C. 2510-2521. It is legally privileged. The information it contains is confidential information and is intended only
for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of the communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
notify me immediately by telephone at (212) 349-0230 and by return e-mail, and delete all copies of the message from
your computer. Thank you.
----Original Message----
From:
(USANYS) [mailto:
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2019 10:01 AM
To: Andrew Patel
Cc: Jill Shellow; Don Yannella;
Subject: RE:
Epstein
Andy,
Attached are unredacted and redacted copies of the notes. As discussed, we intend to produce redacted copies of the
notes pursuant to the protective order, and produce Mr.
name and your contact information to defense
counsel on an AEO basis. The file name will be changed to the bates number so it will not include his name.
I'm also copying my co-counsel
-n'
please include them on emails going forward. Finally,Ms
aware that we are providing these notes to you.
Thanks, and please feel free to give us a call to discuss.
----Original Message---
From: Andrew Patel <I
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2019 8:15 AM
To:
(USANYS) <I
Cc: Andrew Patel <I
›; Jill Shellow <I
:-; Don Yannella
Subject: npstein
Please send us a copy of the disclosure that you are considering as to Mr.
. Seeing the planned disclosure
about our client will help us fashion a means of addressing the concerns we discussed last night.
Many thanks,
Andy
Andrew G. Patel
Attorney at Law
EFTA00100329
Sent from my phone
<Judge Torres Brady preclusion letter Draft.pdf>
EFTA00100330
Document Preview
PDF source document
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.
Extracted Information
Dates
Phone Numbers
Document Details
| Filename | EFTA00100327.pdf |
| File Size | 183.7 KB |
| OCR Confidence | 85.0% |
| Has Readable Text | Yes |
| Text Length | 5,622 characters |
| Indexed | 2026-02-11T10:37:18.975855 |