DOJ-OGR-00007060.jpg

fe N Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO WO Ww a OY 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE LB1TMAX1 Moreover, be cured with an appropriate instruc reason for alleged victims' be drawn against the det Document 465 any potential Filed 11/15/21 Page 9 of 127 9 prejudice in this regard can the precaution is regard tion explaining that the For My colleagues such an instruction privacy, in this district and the witnesses' and and that no inference can or should Fendant because of in similar cases. that this sort of instruction af is fords unfounded. sympathy and credibility" law will these precautions lsewhere have used The defense's concern *"Court-sanctioned My instructions on the clearly and repeatedly instruct the jury on the presumption of innocence and their sole role in assessing witness credibility Nor am LI disclosed some of persuaded by the det disclosure. some victims' names are publicly avail As another district court has held, fFense's arguments that the fact that some alleged victims have previously publicly their allegations obviates the need to limit "Just because lable does not mean that th the details of ir Docket No. Raniere, As case, "Not Deciding investigation or prosecut simply making a public st all accusat to participat 662 at 34 xperien I acknowledged in tions an tion ce are alr , n. 17 ady available." my protec d public s te in or contribute is a tiv order for this far di tatements are equal. to a criminal Fferent matter than tLatement relating to Ms. Maxwell or Jeffrey Epstein." Docket No. 37 in this case at 2. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00007060