DOJ-OGR-00007097.jpg

be N Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO WO Ww a OY 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE LBI5SMAX2 MS. anticipate THE 25 My clerk noted I 5 so we will MOE: But, COURT: OK. Document 465 beyond that, this would be an issue. Filed 11/15/21 your Honor, Page 46 of 127 46 we don't I think we are in agreement. inadvertently skipped over Government return expectation tha include statements by individuals that the government argues that to that. t the testimony of certain w This is the government's itnesses would t the defense can' f those non- credibility o statements would not be admit CESt Lu. are not testifying and t attack the uals because their fying individ ted For their truth but, for example, their ct on the Again, I think witho difficult to make a defini tive ruling but I ut more speciit testifying witness and the like. icity it is examples to give some guidance. Ms. Moe? MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor. think there will be limited testimony about her interaction with other victims. statements that would offered not they would be of explain 'm happy to hear from a victim think the from those other victims would be come in For their truth but because they ar fered for that effect on li the course of events that followed. anticipate of a line of for their trut fering any statements th and so we don't an cross-examination about from non their credibility. instructions, stener and to We don't -testifying victims ticipate opening the door to And so, SOUTHERN D STR CT RE PORT ERS, (212 ) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00007097