DOJ-OGR-00007111.jpg
Extracted Text (OCR)
be
NO
Ww
ws
Oo
OY
~]
oO
Ke)
a
oO
he
be
No
(ee)
=
Hs
Oo
_
OY
a
~]
a
oO
a
Ke}
20
21
22
23
24
25
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
Document 465
Filed 11/15/21 Page 60 of 127 60
LB15SMAX2
MS. MOE: Your Honor, those records would be
authenticated through number of different witnesses; in part,
law enforcement officer describing those exact records being
seized from th
residenc
and format,
TH
|
CO
MS.
TH
|
CO
their employment.
MOE:
Tm
MS. MO!
include testimony about the
they were kept,
these lines.
Circuit's rulings on aut
particulars of
So
contents.
witnesses and,
testimony,
foundation.
TH
mal
advance
We think
collectively,
we would of
COURT:
URT:
Lh «
Dis
witnesses describing the practice
those records contemporaneously and doing so in the course of
in 2005 in their general description
for maintaining
Contemporaneous to what?
At the tim
was made.
Yes,
During the period of
your Honor.
the messag
the conspiracy?
And that testimony would
format of
where
these documents,
ce
and the practi
a document and their
I think this would come in
And I
that 1s consistent with
thentication being based on
at the conclusion of
fer those exhibits based on
don't think
For keeping messages along
the Second
the
their
Formatting and
through a number of
that
that
can rule on that in
until we hear the authentication
videnc
being
fered.
(2)
What you have prof
fered I
think --
the def
ns but it seems
[ wi
1]
hear from
like those pieces coul
authent
tLication.
SOUTHERN
DISTR
CT REPORT
BRS, Pes
(212)
805-0300
ld add up to
DOJ-OGR-00007111