DOJ-OGR-00007115.jpg

NO Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO Ke) a oO he be No (ee) = Hs Oo _ OY a ~] a oO a Ke} 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE LBI5SMAX2 opening. MS. MOE: Th a THE COURT: Document 465 Filed 11/15/21 Page 64 of 127 64 at's correct, your Honor. further on that? Ms. Menninger, anything MS. MENNINGE THE COURT: R: Nothing further on that, your Honor. OK. Anything fur to be addressed now, ther in this general category that needs MS. MENNINGE government intends to was a reference to an government's briefing was mentioned in the was not mentioned in 4A04(b). It is of as that your Honor has e there. TH mal COURT: MS. MOE: Ye We didn't in Ms. Menninger? R: f there is no other evidence that the offer via Rule 404(b), then no. There other exhibit GX-— 416 in the . That was not one of the exhibits that Rule 404(b) letter. assume because it that letter it cannot be of fered through ame type and characteristic of the e-mail I don't know what the intent is xcluded so Ms. Moe? S, your Honor. offering it as direct were included in our clude that exhibit in our notice. We are vidence, unlike the other evidence which notice. That document is a series of notes. The metadata for that exhibit reflects that the defendant created tha exhibits outlined in unlike the other t series of notes but, our letter, it doesn't appear that that was directed at a thi rd-party as opposed to Mr. Epstein, SOUTHE RN D STR CT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00007115