DOJ-OGR-00007149.jpg

fe N Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO WO a oO a fe N Ww = Hs Oo a OY a ~] a oO a Ke) 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE LBITMAX3 discrete fashion, and I about what the other of Document 465 believe they do not Ficers did or didn't search. And look, could say I was there, fine. can't put it all together I was over here and did this, I understand if saw this, I don't have a problem with haven't identified that witness or what witness is going to talk about. somebody over for you 20 years a can au that. B pie Problem number two is the timing of Filed 11/15/21 they have a Page 98 of 127 98 have knowledge do as part So what we end up with is this piecemeal approach of: there did that, that of but fter the witness fact. who thenticate, ut again, that's they this ces of this. October 2005 search wher table has to do with 1994, Whether it was that in a moment in time, items wer to now relate back to a 1994 to 2004 that So that's problem number one. This is an they seized items that they're trying timefram What that I don't know. 2004, I don't know. there in 2004, in we don't know. October 2005, seized and that ends up on a search inventory foundation to it. And there may be discrete pieces of certain witness might be able to identi from a deceased detectiv That's my problem, that do your fy, Al 1 we know is someone says these warrant e580 Honor. but I think do it, and just short shrifting the whole eviden these proffers where they're saying we can convinced they can. THE COURT: We're not short shrif SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, (212) 805-0300 PG ew 't have any evidence that a we're tiary process here with I'm not Fring because it DOJ-OGR-00007149