DOJ-OGR-00007156.jpg

be N Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO WO a oO = be N Ww = Hs Oo a OY a ~] a oO a Ke) 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 465 LB1ib5max4 THE COURT: So to issues, Filed 11/15/21 Page 105 of 127 the extent there is overlap in these it's best to take it up in the 412 proceeding so that we can discuss the issues without violating that rule. admission of s with respect before me, 401 Defendant's 13. to everal exhibits. Exhibit 251 and 2 relevanc 403 prejudice. authentication issue so otherwis 294, so some of I think preclude this evidence. corroborative rule out 401 but the det evidence of 88. is minimal, at best the same questions around that ruling holds. This is a motion to preclude the I'm going to grant the motion Based on the briefing , and outweighed by the T won't It is potentially testimony and 403 prejudice does not fense can maintain the search and authentication issues that we have discussed. probative of Mr. Epstein. and that testimony and I Exhibit 403 the relationship bet I won't preclude, n the d it's potentially fendant and The government prof that it will corroborate the photo would corroborate anticipated witness don't -- so, ther is 401 r levance and not substantially outweighed by any 403 prejudice. On th had 403 on min indicated I am the relationsh is last one Exhibit 313 e. SO, I may have said the wrong number. not excluding, it is potentia ip between the def outweighed by And t prejudice. hen 606, this is is the photograph that I have lly probative of ndant and Mr. Epstein and not the issue on authentication and SOUTHERN D STR CT RE PORTERS, (212) 805-0300 PG ew 105 DOJ-OGR-00007156