DOJ-OGR-00007433.jpg
Extracted Text (OCR)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 493 Filed 11/22/21 Page3of6
Page 3
225, and the broker-dealer had pleaded guilty to manipulate the share price “rather than to execute
the private placement, id. at 231. But that was “not conclusive”: “[t]he key question . . . is whether
the losses suffered by the private placement victims were ‘directly and proximately’ caused by the
conspiracy to manipulate the public share price.” /d. (quoting 18 U.S.C. § 3663A(a)(2)); see id.
at 234 (reversing because the record lacked adequate evidence of proximate causation); see also,
e.g., United States v. Oladimeji, 463 F.3d 152, 159 (2d Cir. 2006) (affirming restitution for losses
caused by fraudulent use of credit cards where defendant was convicted of possession of the cards
with intent to defraud).
Under these principles, Minor Victim-3 is a victim of the Mann Act conspiracies. Those
conspiracies operated through a pattern of recruiting minor girls, grooming them, asking them to
massage Epstein, and then sexualizing the massages, from 1994 to 2004, across Epstein and the
defendant’s various properties. (See 11/05/21 Gov’t Letter at 5-6, 9). It was reasonably
foreseeable to the defendant that she and Epstein’s efforts to recruit the girls to whom Epstein was
sexually attracted would include recruiting a seventeen-year-old—Minor Victim-3—1in the course
of that conspiracy. And but for that recruitment, Minor Victim-3 would not have been harmed.
See United Sates v. Ray, 337 F.R.D. 561, 570 (S.D.N.Y. 2020) (“The definition of victim under
the CVRA is expansive. It is not limited to those, such as Jane Doe-1 and Jane Doe-2 who
allegedly were victims of physical abuse.”); cf, e.g., United States v. Battista, 575 F.3d 226, 231
(2d Cir. 2009) (“Although Battista did not defraud the NBA directly, we conclude that the district
court properly characterized the NBA as a ‘victim’ . . . because the NBA was harmed by the
conduct committed during the course of the conspiracy to transmit wagering information.”).
Consider, for instance, a robbery crew that conspired to commit Hobbs Act robberies. Ifthe crew
robbed a business that was not engaged in interstate commerce, the elements of the offense could
DOJ-OGR-00007433