Back to Results

DOJ-OGR-00007444.jpg

Source: IMAGES  •  Size: 674.8 KB  •  OCR Confidence: 94.1%
View Original Image

Extracted Text (OCR)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 494 _ Filed 11/22/21 Page8of12 The Honorable Alison J. Nathan November 11, 2021 Page 8 allegedly had a motive to obtain young women, but not underaged girls, to satisfy Epstein. Accuser-3’s evidence is simply not probative of any proper 404(b) purpose. Furthermore, admitting Accuser-3’s evidence for these purposes would conflict with the Court’s preliminary rulings at the November 10™ conference concerning the permissible scope of Accuser-3’s testimony. The Court recognized that allowing Accuser-3 to testify about her sexual acts with Epstein would create a significant risk that the jury will convict Ms. Maxwell on an improper premise that these sex acts were illegal. Admitting Accuser-3’s testimony to prove Ms. Maxwell’s knowledge, intent, motive, etc. would be at odds with that ruling. For Accuser-3’s testimony to be admitted as proof that Ms. Maxwell knew that Epstein’s massages were sexualized, for example, Accuser-3 would have to testify that she engaged in sex acts with Epstein during her massages. The same is true if her testimony is offered to show Ms. Maxwell’s motive or intent, or the modus operandi of the charged conspiracies. Accordingly, Accuser-3’s evidence should not be admitted under Rule 404(b). Finally, whatever minimal relevance (if any) that Accuser-3’s testimony may have as 404(b) evidence is dwarfed by the significant prejudice Ms. Maxwell will suffer if it is admitted. The government has already advised the Court and the defense repeatedly that Accuser-3 feels that she was “sexually abused” by Epstein and that her sexual contact with Epstein was “unwanted and traumatic.” November 5 Ltr. at 12; see also 11/1/2021 Tr. 75:23-76:01. The government has also cautioned that Accuser-3 will likely become emotional and upset if she allowed to describe these events to the jury. The defense does not doubt that this is true. That is precisely why the Court must exclude Accuser-3’s evidence under Rule 403. As the Court has already recognized, such 2049808. 1 DOJ-OGR-00007444

Document Preview

DOJ-OGR-00007444.jpg

Click to view full size

Document Details

Filename DOJ-OGR-00007444.jpg
File Size 674.8 KB
OCR Confidence 94.1%
Has Readable Text Yes
Text Length 2,057 characters
Indexed 2026-02-03 17:23:20.882885