EFTA00145606.pdf
PDF Source (No Download)
Extracted Text (OCR)
Epstein and Maxwell Rape and Sex Traffick Survivor -
Former Client of David Boies, Sigrid McCawley, Stanley Pottinger and
Brad Edwards.
06 September 2022
When I was seeking legal representation to advocate for my rights as a sex trafficked
victim of Epstein, Maxwell and their co-conspirators, David Boies and his firm
informed me that they would re
me only if I provided a deposition in support
of one of his other clients,
for use in her civil case.
I did not want to provide the deposition as I knew I would have to disclose very
personal details that I did not feel ready to tell at that stage. However, I wanted to
secure legal representation, so I agreed. Boies and his firm promised me that the
deposition would remain sealed entirely and confidential. The deposition transcript,
which I can produce, is clearly labelled "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL".
I was asked to do the deposition on 17 February 2017. Still, according to my
records, I did not sign a retainer with Boies Schiller until 24 February 2017, which
shows that they were waiting for me to do the deposition before representing me.
They filed my civil claim on 26th January 2017 — before they were even formally
my lawyers.
On January 10, 2017, I wrote an email to Stan. "Stan Can you please give me a call
please thank you S"
On January 13, 2017, Stan wrote back to me. "Hi
When can we talk?
Important that we do so Friday. Send Proton, please. Stan"
On January 14th, 2017, I wrote to Stan and Brad. "Stan, Can you please give me an
update on what this deposition relates to, i.e. Which case? Also, did you manage to
talk with the 1 party you contacted and the other you were trying to contact? Thank
you"
On January 14th2017 Stan wrote,
"The other side has been notified that we will be taking your deposition in the next
three weeks. Only the time needs to be worked out. I mention this, as I did in our
telcon call today, so that you can be on your toes in case they try to call you, email
you, or contact you in any way. Do not talk to them in any fashion. Hang Up. Do not
reply to emails. Do not be frightened by anything. Once you are in the open, so to
speak, you are safer than ever. They cannot harass you because your name is now
part of the United court system. They are not allowed to tamper with you, and if they
try, they are subject to legal sanctions by the court. Let me know if you get any
strange calls or efforts to contact you. You will be fine, but we want to know of any
funny business by the other side. Best, Stan".
On 14th January 2017, Stan wrote,
1
EFTA00145606
"Hi,
The deposition will be taken in connection with
case against
Maxwell, which will go to trial in March. The suble,s covered are those we talked
about with you in person, including Epstein and
. I will talk to you on the
phone regarding the scope of the deposition and the related questions you raise,
including your own lawsuit against Epstein"
On the 21st of February 2017, four days after the deposition, I wrote to Stan, "Stan,
when are you able to call me please."
On 21Nt February 2017, Stan replies, "What about"
On 2ist February 2017, I replied, "Stan, I think you know what it's about. Now that
you guys have what you want from me, you have left me high and dry. You obviously
don't need me anymore. Your last conversation was a disgrace, and you have let me
down and gone back on your word. Our time is finished."
Three days later, on the 24th of February 2017, after they had already filed my
own lawsuit 26th January 2017, I eventually signed the retainer for Boise Shiller.
When I was asked to do the deposition for
was frightened, and indeed Jeffrey was
trying to find me whilst in hiding.
On
2017, Jeffrey contacted another sex trafficked victim
. Epstein wrote,
"hi, was
a friend of yours?"
Doing that deposition jeopardised my safety, and it wasn't even for my own case but
for another of his clients. I had already been tracked down in Barcelona, and they
knew this, which is why I went into hiding in the first place.
I made it very dear at the start of the deposition that I was afraid for my and my
family's safety and that I had been followed. During the deposition, I was then
harassed and intimidated to repeatedly give the address where I was in hiding,
including my loved one contact details.
This made me very uncomfortable and even more frightened as Ghislaine appeared
by telephone for the deposition duration. I don't know who else was listening and
remember hearing a male cough at one point during the deposition. I found this
incredibly intimidating.
I would like to point out that in Brad Edwards's book, "Relentless Pursuit" pg
302 and 303, he said that after my two-day briefing in Barcelona on his way back to
Miami had two near-death experiences "In one day, I discovered twice that I
was lucky to be alive."
2
EFTA00145607
So, if Brad has experienced two near-death experiences, why on earth would the
put me on a plane whilst in hiding with Jeffrey trying to locate me to do
deposition a month later!!
This shows that Boies and Co had absolutely no regard for me and my then
Peter's safety, who flew with me and was always about their other client
. This,
of course, was not mentioned to me and had the delight of reading about it in his
book years after the incidents occurred.
If I had known about Brad's er,ces,
I would never ever have flown to New
York to do that deposition for
, but sadly if I had known, I would have had
little choice otherwise; they wouldn't have proceeded with my own litigation against
Epstein and Co. They could have arranged to do the deposition in Spain to protect
me. Perhaps I'm the one that's lucky to be alive?!
What is even worse, whilst I was in New York for
deposition, they helped
me reach out to another fellow survivor who was on the island with me. She was the
young ballerina I tried to protect from Epstein and Maxwell and the co-conspirators.
We were both raped repeatedly by Epstein whilst on the island together. I wanted to
reach out to her to see if she was still alive and tell her I loved her and that I was
sorry I didn't take her with me when I fled for my life in 2007 from Epstein and
Maxwell. I couldn't. For years I blamed myself for not saving her.
On 28th February 2017,
(the other rape victim) wrote to me,
"Hi IM, it's
catch up!"
It was so nice hearing from you, and I can't wait to see you and
On 28th February 2017, I wrote to Stan and Brad, "I'm just going to forward any
correspondence I have with her."
On the ist of March 2017, Stan wrote to me saying that he had managed to contact
her,
"I sent an email to her inviting her to a risk-free chat. This would be an ideal time for
you to send her an email encouraging her to meet and assuring her that she can trust
me. She has absolutely nothing to lose and potentially a lot to gain. Tnx."
It breaks my heart that whilst I was trying to connect with a long-lost friend and
fellow survivor of Epstein, I led her straight into the lion's den. I won't forgive myself
for that.
was also a key witness in my own litigation because she would
corroborate my story and whom we met on the island, for example, Epstein and
Maxwell's long-time friends Sergey Brim (Co-Founder of Google) and his then fiancé
Ann Wojcicki (Co-Founder of 23&ME) on it January 2007.
3
EFTA00145608
fully corroborated my story! We also both had a disk of photos that Jean Luc
Brunel gave us during one trip to the island which included ictures of us, another
rape victim,
Epstein, Maxwell,
and Jean Luc
himself, staff etc.
I also have an email from
on 28 December 2006 confirming this
trip.
correspondence of that specific trip below will also be included in
my evidence.
"Here is your flight details..You will be going with a girl named
and a guy
named Valdson. They will both be staying at3oi E. 66 as well. I have a car picking
you all up at 6:45am if you want to meet in tlii
i.Please let me know you got
this.. thanks!Traveler(s) Frequent flier detai
Saturday,
December 30, 2006Continental Airlines 1884Depart: 9:25ammorning Newark,
NJNewark Liberty Int'l (EWR)Arrive: 2:43pmafternoon St Thomas Island, Virgin
Islands (U.S.)St Thomas Island Cyril E King (SIT)Econom
Boein 737-700
Passenger (73G) I 4hr 18min I 1635 milesSeat:
This confirms that I was housed in one of Epstein's residences, where most rape
survivors were housed.
Initially,
said she would help me, but she just disappeared "conveniently",
and I never heard from her again. I was shocked to see her in the courtroom when on
29th August 2019, Judge Richard M Burman kindly invited the survivors who had
the bravery and courage to come forward to have a voice. Epstein's death was a
tragedy because he would never be held accountable for his crimes against humanity.
All of us were profoundly and still are affected by this miscarriage of justice, thanks
to the DOJ.
Judge Burman gave us a slice of dignity and self-worth back when we all gave our
Victim Impact Statements, and he finally gave some of us our day in court after years
of fighting for justice. Burman didn't want us to be "Silenced" in our fight for justice.
For that, I'm most grateful. I never got to thank him personally.
The other Umatilla: day is that it turned out that Brad and Stan were now
representing
I wish Brad and Stan had told me they had contact with her
and found this confusing and distressing, especially as they knew I had reached out
to her before for my own litigation.
I'm also confused about why she wasn't subpoenaed and deposed in my own
litigation or her little sister. My case was unduly "settled" in December 2018, yet
the very key witness that would provide testimony is now their client a mere 8
months later. I'm assuming they also represented her little sister too, which also
could have provided information on Epstein's sex trafficking conspiracy.
I also don't understand why Igor Zinoviev, Epstein's bodyguard, was not subpoenaed
in my own litigation. In Brad's book, pg.; 305, he said he met Igor after meeting me
in Barcelona. Igor, who was also a key witness in my litigation, confirmed to Brad
that I did try and swim off the island that night after I had been repeatedly raped by
Epstein.
4
EFTA00145609
"Yes, he confirmed that
tried to swim off the island, but her attempt showed no
greater level of distress than he'd seen in other girls throughout the years. The rest of
the meeting had little to do with the girls and much to do with the danger he saw me
putting myself in with Epstein".
This was a direct threat to Brad and his safety. Again, I ask, why would they then put
me on a plane less than a month later to benefit another client, n
In my previous grievance dated 19th August 2022, I wrote,
"In 2020, Boise and his firm asked the courts to unseal my deposition against my
wishes and make the evidence public. This is because to do so would benefit another
of his clients,
, but was strongly counter to my interests."
Upon my own investigation and that of Law 360, which was reported on 26th
August 2022 (David Boies Faces Grievance Complaint Over Epstein Case I would
like to point out that Boies Shiner had been disqualified from representing
in
the Dershowitz case since her (and my) attorneys could be called to testify as part of
the underlying allegations in the case, according to a court order.
"Other attorneys for
were on board with at least disclosing records that
directly concerned Dershowitz. However, before making its decision on the bid to
unseal records, the court asked Jane Does, which included
, to register any
objection."
When the judge did give the Jane Does an opportunity to rirgragjections, I
had to hear the news from another sex trafficked survivor
another of
David Boies's Clients.
I made my feelings very clear about the release of my deposition when I wrote to
Brad on 23" April 2020,
"Dear Brad, Thank you for taking time out for me yesterday. Unfortunately I had
some bad news from Sigrid yesterday and am besieged and riddled with FEAR, anger
and hatred! Enough'', m I have had enough mm I'm inconsolable since Sigrid and
my conversation yesterday. Alan is after me. He will find me and serve me.For
what??? This is not my case, I chose my battles wisely and this was not a fight I have
the strength to fight. If I wanted to be involved in this shit show I would have sued
Alan myself but chose a life of peace and solidarity instead. And my voice was
silenced by the very people I trusted. For what! Do I need to jump off another
balcony to appease all of you, because I will!!You will never know what I went
through. Ever! What do you want from me! I'm broken now I have to live in fear,
once a
Everyday, every month, every year until Alan finds me! I supported
once before, and will not do it again. She also betrayed me. I'm aware of the
amount she earned through her settlement. Not even a fraction of what was
com ensated to me. I know this as a fact. I spent two years living in isolation in a
here I didn't have an English conversation for two years because I
5
EFTA00145610
was so frightened. For what! I was followed i
none of you believed me
but you were almost taken out twice at the airport after meeting me) and my life
threatened yet you guys still did not believe me. I will give you my previous address
so you can research where I lived and maybe then you'll have some respect for me
and what I have actually been through. Now I must live in fear once more!!!! Alan
will find mem', For what, so VR can get another payout!!! I will rather jump again!!!
And I'm not joking! Who will protect me??? David Boies, that's as bad as a knock
knock joke! I will not be betrayed again! I'm tired of being used!
I later followed up with an email to Brad, 23rd April 2020 7.39pm UK Time,
"If Alan or his cronies come anywhere near me or my home, you will all have blood
on your hands."
On 5th August 2020, I wrote to Sigrid, S
sent me this. What on earth is going
on?".
On 5th August 2020, I wrote again to Sigrid, "I have two days, Sigrid!".
On 6th AiS
2020, Sigrid responds, "That is
texting a clip from an Order
from the
v. Dershowitz case that Judge Preska issued — (I am not counsel in
that case, but she is the same Judge that is overseeing the unsealing process in the
v. Maxwell case). There is a Protective Order in that case, and Dershowitz is
seeking certain documents under the Protective Order. She is giving anyone who
wants to object until August 8th to lodge an objection which is why I reached out to
you yesterday about setting up a call with the lawyer I found who can represent you
pro bono to help you with that objection. I have not heard back from him regarding a
time for that call yet. Here is the full order above from the
v. Dershowitz
case."
On 6th August 2020, Sigrid follows up with another email which says, "I was typing
too fast — so sorry — It is August 18th, so you have 13 days to lodge an objection — she
just issued the order. I am helping you by finding you a lawyer that can represent
you so you can submit the objection you want to make. I just have not heard back
from him yet on a time for a call. I will let you know as soon as I hear. "
Fir.r
liI should never have been informed by another sex trafficked survivor
who first went to the FBI in
to report this sex trafficking conspiracy
which included her sister
another client of Boise who after years of
representing me, they were just about to betray me. I'm grateful to
At thatir,t, I had days per my email to Sigrid. If I hadn't received a warning from
and emailed Sigrid, when would my attorneys have told me? Before
it's too late? I assume yes!! Clever strategy but failed.
Secondly, they again created a conflict of interest between two existing clients for
benefit. They received my doctor's letter in July. They were fully aware that
I did not want to be involved in any more litigation, especially be a witness for
again in any other of her civil suits so that she and her attorneys could
have another payday.
6
EFTA00145611
Thirdly, they should not have continued to represent me with our compensation fund
application against Epstein's Estate. They were no longer my lawyers and had a
conflict of interest because of MB
How do I know that they, in fact, represented my best interests as their former
client? I did get compensation however feel that no victim was compensated
correctly and feel it was more silencing money to sign away any further legal
proceedings against the perpetrators, and every single victim that came forward
signed away their rights for scrapes.
Fourthly, it's appalling that Sigrid gave me, her client, so little time to find a new law
firm to represent me and to put my case together to protect myself and my family.
At this point, I was desperate to find new lawyers to represent me in the fight against
Boise's attempt to go public with a deposition that I never wanted to give and was
promised would be forever kept under seal. This fight is ongoing and has harmed me
immeasurably.
They knew that deposition had sensitive material about my private life and family,
including their contact details which I did not feel comfortable giving to Ghislaine's
attorneys (AS I WAS IN HIDING). I was incredibly embarrassed about my past,
which was later used against me in litigation to my detriment.
Due to Boies and Co giving me so little time to prepare to objec.taiiinst my
deposition being released to the public, which would benefit
massively in her
upcoming civil trial against Dershowitz, I wrote to Brad on August' th, 2020,
"Dear Brad,
I authorize you to speak to Steve Kelly and his team regarding matters concerning
my intention to file an objection to the unsealing of my deposition in the Southern
District of New York.
I'm really concerned though as Sigrid said she had found a lawyer to represent me
Pro Bono to make the objection but she said he hadn't got back to her. That was two
days ago.
I can't afford a lawyer to help me and feel very let down and abandoned by other
parties, you are very much excluded from this. Would Steve be able to do the
objection pro bono?
I'm at a loss of what to do and completely traumatised by the whole thing. I have
until the i8 th August to put in my objection and time is running out."
On 7th August 2020 Brad responds,
7
EFTA00145612
Because of the particular legal conflict, I cannot speak with Steve on your behalf on
this matter. It's just not allowed or I would do it of course.
He is a reasonable and good guy, which is why I connected you to him. He will do a
good job. However, I doubt he will handle this pro bono but you can ask him. If you
learn who Sigrid was connecting you with, let me know and I'll see if I know them.
Brad"
I signed a retainer with Marsh Law Firm plc on 13th August 2020, and superhero
Bob filed a motion on the 25th of August 2020 toprotect m
rivacy and to STOP
ME FROM BEING PULLED INTO ANOTHER
CASE AGAINST
MY WILL! From what I understand, it was Paul Cassell who helped find James
Marsh Law Firm.
I would like to make it dear that if the judge had not given the Jane Does an
extension to put in their objections, I would have, without question, missed the 18th
August 2020 deadline.
Boies and Co knew this, too otherwise, they would have helped me seek other legal
representation months earlier and not right at the last moment when they knew fine
well that the initial deadline was near enough impossible to meet.
I can also produce a note fro
Sigrid
McCawley, dated gist July 20
, w is was a e o my compensa 'on fund claim
against Epstein's Estate, in which they represented me. Dr Lockwood wrote,
"it is important for her healing for Ms
to be able to process her past
without the ongoing disruption of court proceedings and with her confidentiality
being maintained."
My current attorneys, Bob and James, also wrote a letter, which I can also produce,
saying that I "should not now be forced to endure further emotional turmoil by being
pulled (unwillingly) into another round of heated litigation, with its attendant public
feeding frenzy."
I was so afraid of the deposition being unsealed that I felt forced to write my memoir,
"Silenced No More, Surviving My Journey To Hell And Back," and include
most of all of the details that I disclosed in the deposition in an attempt to take
control of the narrative.
Consequently, I have been massively victim shamed, which has taken an enormous
toll on me emotionally.
8
EFTA00145613
I also feel that Boies Schiller failed to help me when I desperately tried to give my
evidence to the FBI and the prosecutors involved in the federal investigation against
Maxwell and others in Epstein's sex trafficking conspiracy.
I had approached the FBI several times, asking to be interviewed and share my
evidence about Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking scheme. Still, I never got a response
and repeatedly tried to make an official complaint against them too but was ignored
by the FBI.
I requested Sigrid to help me with this, and she responded in an email dated
February 4th, 2020, which I can produce:
"I do not have experience with complaints to the FBI and that I was trying to get a
hold of David who is in the USVI handling the hearing today. When I am able to
reach him I will discuss this with him and get back to you." As far as I know, no one
at the firm ever pursued my complaint against the FBI."
On February 4, 2020, I wrote to Sigrid, saying, "I don't feel that I am being
represented equally or fairly and have never been either. I'm tired of being ignored
not only by you guys but also by the FBI and Scotland Yard. I have been shown no
respect, humility, kindness or compassion by anyone."
In my view, this is a direct obstruction of justice at its finest in an ongoing federal
investigation not only by Boies and Co but also by the federal prosecutors in the FBI
carrying out the investigation. My evidence includ
photographic evidence of
Epstein, Maxwell, Jean Luc Brunel,
M
other rape
victims, including
, who had also come forward at that point the date Se ey
Brim (another long-term friend of Epstein's and the Clintons) and
ho
visited the island and Cathy Alexander, the house manager on the islan s e is in
the background in a photo).
I also have multi le
evidence against
and
. Flight logs
which show
was on with us on at least one occasion email
correspondence between myself and my recruited
and a first-hand
witness Igor. He cooperated with Brad, as mentioned before, who confirmed I tried
to swim off the island due to being in extreme distress.
I would like to clarify that I called the Metropolitan Police, not Scotland Yard, on the
30th of January 2020 to try and report the sex trafficking ring and the
perpetrators who enabled my rape and others. I have the recording upon request. As
as informed to go to my local
olice Station to report my crime of an international sex trafficking
operation. The lo
'olice station didn't speak English.
Because my lawyers were not helping me give my statement and evidence to the FBI,
I was forced to go to a separate organisation, the Organization for Security and Co-
operation in Europe (OSCE), on my own to try and give my evidence about Jeffrey
Epstein and his co-conspirators. Although my case had been settled (to my detriment
and to silence me...again), I still wanted to hold these people accountable.
9
EFTA00145614
Money was never my drive to prevent further children and women from being raped.
There were no civil suits on the horizon, just a passion for helping other human
beings, so they didn't suffer as I and many others had. When Brad sent me a signed
copy of his book in his personal message to me, he wrote,
"=,
I remember your first call like it was yesterday. For you, it was never about
the money and only doing the right thing. The world needs more like you. Your
Courage will never be forgotten by me".
On 25 February 2020, I wrote to the OSCE: "I will fight this battle with everything
I have to give, and I'm not giving up hope. So yes, please pass on my information to
the right people. Not only for me but for every rape victim that has been abused
previously, for every current rape victim and future."
A representative at OSCE said she had passed on my evidence to the US Department
of Homeland Security, but I never heard back from them.
On the 9th Match 2020, the representative wrote to me,
"Dear_,
I hope this finds you well, and Peter is getting better. I want to inform you that we
passed your evidence to a US Homeland Security chargé.
Best wishes,
Lilia"
I expressed my concern in an email to another attorney, Brad Edwards. I wrote on
March 23, 2020:
"I no longer want to be represented by Boies Schiller. I understand this is complex,
but I don't feel they have worked in my interest or the other victims."
On April 6, 2020, I expressed my sense of betrayal to Stan Pottinger directly in an
email. He did not respond.
On the 28th of July 2020 I was utterly shocked and retraumatized when the Daily
Mail found the woman i
living in LA. She is the one responsible for
coercing and profiting handsomely from befriending me in a nightclub and luring me
into Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking ring, which resulted in me being repeatedly
raped. It was a shock to see her, but Boies and Co told me they could not locate her
during my own litigation, which is why she was never subpoenaed and deposed.
The article is titled "Elusive Epstein sex ring 'recruiter' who 'lured young
women to financier's Paedophile Island' is spotted starting her 'new life in
Los Angeles as friends insist 'she was a victim too.'"
On Jul 29, 2020, at 7:02 AM I wrote to Brad Edwards regarding the article.
"Omg!
What a liar, she knew exactly what would happen to me after meeting JE.
10
EFTA00145615
Epstein's sex ring 'recruiter' is spotted hiding away in Los Angeles"
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 1 at 13:15, Brad Edwards <
> wrote,
"Let's talk tomorrow. As with all things in this case, nothing is simple. The fact that
is cooperating could actually be really good for your claim so let's think this
through before reacting.
I thought I told you to stop reading this smut! Kidding. I knew you couldn't stop
altogether. But it really rarely helps. Either way, hang tight. We will talk tomorrow.
I'll send you an email when I get in with the call in number."
, who was on the island with me on more than one occasion, was there to
ifiline and others between rapes, as were others when
wasn't around.
is a long-time employee of Jeffrey Epstein, profiting greatly from this
sex trafficking conspiracy.
went on to marry
heportedly from Belarus, in October
2013, according to Daniel Bates for the Daily Mail.
3rd of March 2020 - Daily Mail
"This is the dentist girlfriend of Jeffrey Epstein who he phoned from prison just before
he hanged himself — but gave no hint he was so despondent he was about to commit
suicide"
They reportedly got divorced in July 2019 after Jeffrey Epstein was arrested.
Karyna Shuliak, is reportedly the last person to speak to Epstein before his death when
he rang her on 10th August 2019.
I would like to point out that Boies joined Theodore Olsen (the attorney who
represented Bush against Al Gore in 2001, Boies being the attorney) in the fight for
same-sex marriage (which I fully support) in the state of California.
The case Perry V Brown began in 2009. It was argued in the Supreme Court on 26th
March 2013 and decided on 26th June 2013.
11
EFTA00145616
andaere
subsequently married in October 2013. Was this in the State
of California? I presume we will find out in due course.
I hope for Boies's sake they were not married in the state of California because once
again, everything he does and touches always leads back to aiding and abetting a sex
trafficking scheme which was used to grant visas to Epstein and Co's victims, which
has been widely reported as another way to get Epstein victims visas to enter the US.
I'm also confused about how Brad Edwards could also be
attorney. I
mentioned her repeatedly during my litigation and in my deposition for
. Why
was she not subpoenaed in my own litigation? I would also like to make clear that in
my own litigation on 20th December 2018, on the docket, it says my case was
dismissed voluntarily without prejudice against
M=,
and she did not
respond to the lawsuit.
They said they couldn't find her. Daily Mail found it very easy. Again, a little black
cube action on her would have worked in a rape victim's favour, No? But it's ok to
behave like that when trying to intimidate and silence witnesses and the New York
Times journalists in another former client's case, serial rapist Harvey Weinstein but
not for justice for another?
Of course, they could have found her
and did so only afteasase was
unlawfullaled, just like they could have found
Igor,
etc.
Igor and
had already corroborated my story right from the beginning in
January 2017.
I understand that if they had all been subpoenaed and ignored the subpoena, they
would have all been found guilty of contempt of court, which is a criminal offence
punishable by prison. None of the named persons was deposed in my own litigation.
Nor am I aware that any other depositions were taken, for example, Epstein's,
Maxwell
and
and
Therefore, I accuse Boies and Co of aiding and abetting Epstein and co's sex
trafficking conspiracy where I and hundreds if not thousands of children and young
12
EFTA00145617
women were repeatedly raped. How many others were raped after I came forward in
October 2016 to get justice for what these people did?? I'm aware that Epstein was
arrested after returning from Paris. I would like to point out that the age of sexual
consent is shockingly 15 in France. Epstein should never have been allowed to leave
the United States of America after he was first convicted in 2008.
David Boies and Stan Pottinger also asked me to put my name to an op-ed in the New
York Times titled "How David Boies Saved Me." I received a call from Pottinger
asking me to do this on a Saturday morning after not having heard from my lawyers
for several weeks and sending distressed emails asking for any updates on my case.
Then, I finally received contact from my lawyers in the form of a call from Pottinger
asking me to agree to put my name on the Op-Ed. I felt Boies and Pottinger wanted
me to do it, so I agreed. I firmly believe this went against my interests and that Boies
used me to rehabilitate his reputation. I feel that this is highly inappropriate. I had
repeatedly begged the lawyers to do a media campaign to expose Epstein and co and
wanted to encourage more victims to come forward. I was repeatedly ignored.
On 29 August 2017 I had an update from Brad regarding my own litigation,
"Epstein's attorneys have been successful in delaying things further. We will be in
touch and let you know how long the case gets delayed. It is somewhat complicated
so let me give you the simple version. Epstein's lawyer argued to the court that they
want to include some information (particularly the Callahan emails and portions of
your deposition) in their Motion to Dismiss; however, those emails and that
testimony were collected under a protective order in the Maxwell
case, which
currently prevents the use of those materials. You Judge told them to request relief
from the protective Order from the Judge in the other case and if he grants that relief
then they can use those materials. At this point, the other Judge has not ruled on
whether those materials can be used, so we are in a holding pattern and there is
currently nothing we can do to speed up the process. We will of course let you know
as soon as we hear anything. Ask any questions you may have, and we will try to
answer but just don't know much more and can't currently do anything more.
I hope all is well. Talk to you soon."
On October 17, 2017, I wrote to Brad as I hadn't heard any updates in my case for
sometime.
"Good Morning Brad,
I hope you are well?
We havent spoken for awhile so I thought I would just check on how everything is
going?
Kind Regards
13
EFTA00145618
On 17 October 2017 Brad responded,
"We are still tied up in hearings related to Epstein trying to obtain and use your
Callahan emails for the purpose of having your case dismissed. We are fighting those
attempts but Epstein is putting many eggs in that basket so they are fighting to use
them. It seems like the Court is going to be willing to let Epstein use them, although
that does not necessarily mean the Court will be willing to dismiss your case. Once
the Court makes any meaningful rulings on the issue, we will let you know. How have
you been?"
On 17th October 2017, I responded,
"Thanks for the update. I am good actually. I feel like I have come along way
emotionally and mentally through this period. Despite what happens, I will never
regret coming forward as it made me deal with issues that I had kept hidden which
made me a very angry person for a very long time.
This Weinsten bussiness has brought a bit of upset back because its along the similar
lines as myself however feel Epsein is worse.
If the trial doesnt happen, I do feel positive now that the media will definitly be
interested in all my photos, emails everything and my story.
The nice thing is that there is zero motive for money on my part because ill just hand
everything over and not ask for a single cent in return. I want to humiliate him like
he did me and the recent media coverage has given me hope.
I still stand by those email I sent to Callahan and by no means should that stop this
going to trial. I really hope the judge uses his brains but time will tell. It will not look
good for him if he dismisses this case.
Thanks Brad for everything and your in my prayers everyday."
On 17 October 2017, I send a follow-up email to Brad,
"Is there no way we can use this Wienstien media coverage to our advantage?
Can we not leak about Jeffery and Ghilslain? Has G been found yet? Maybe this will
up our game, get more girls ro come forward and put preassure on the judge?"
On 17 October 2017, Brad responded,
"We found and served G last week. So she is in.
Did you ever meet Weinstein? Do you know anything about a relationship between
Weinstein and Epstein? If so, how do we prove it? "
14
EFTA00145619
On Oct 17, 2017, I responded to Brad,
"Well done for finding that horrid woman. I would have paid good money to see her
face when served. Good job :)
Can we prehaps have a quixk chat instead. Just 5 mins to explain where i am going
with this. At least its something we should consider.
Please let me know when is a good time to chat? "
On 17 October 2017, Brad sends a follow-up email,
"Did you ever meet Weinstein? Just curious. I have a reason for asking."
On 17 October 2017, I responded,
No i havent ever met him but i suspect they were friends. Too many similarities
including their involvment with the Clinton Fountaion.
However if I come forward with my story re Epstein any involvement that those two
have had together would for sure come out. io0%.
I would like to go to the media. I think the time is rigt now. Can we that?
On 17 October 2017, Brad responded,
"I will be with Stan today. He is flying down from New York. Let me talk with him
and then I will circle back with you."
On 17th October 2017, I responded to Brad
"Thanks
Basically the question is :
With the momentum of the Weinstein issues creating a catalyst for girls to come
forward . Should we/I/someone make a call via the media/social media for girls
`abused' by Epstein et al to come forward?
Let's discuss an appropriate plan going forward please !!
S"
On 1.7th October 2017, Brad responded,
"I understand. There is a Weinstein/epstein connection though that we are looking
into presently."
15
EFTA00145620
On 20th October 2017, I wrote to Brad,
"Hi Brad,
How is everything going? Please let me know when your ready to chat.
Kind Regrads
On 2" November 2017, I wrote to Brad again,
"Hi Brad,
I hope you are well?
Please can we arrange a time to talk?
Kind Regards
On the 7th of November 2017, I wrote to Brad again,
"Hi Brad
I havent heard back from you for weeks now. Has something happened, are ypu ok?
I dont know what else to think really?
Please can you get in touch with me. Im loosing my mind waiting to have some for of
communication??"
On 7th November 2017, after multiple emails to Brad, I finally got a response,
"I'm sorry. We have a hearing related to your case tomorrow which I will report back
to you on. I'm in NY with Stan right now as a mater of fact. Another hearing in your
case next week regarding Maxwell. We are still wrestling with them on the email
issue and whether confidentiality will be a part of your case.
I'll set up a call with you as soon as I get a chance.
I have to fly out to Chicago today for hearings there then my own depo in FL. So this
week is extra busy."
The Op-Ed was published on the 15th of November 2017 in the New York times.
On 22 November 2017, 7 days after the Op-Ed was published, the radio silence
began again, and I emailed Brad for an update on my own litigation.
16
EFTA00145621
"Morning Brad,
Hope you are well?
Just wondering how eveything is going that side? Do we know if this is going to trial
yet?
Any features ruffled with the letter that was published re David Boies?
Kind Regards
On 24th November 2017, 9 days after the Op-Ed was published, I write to Brad
again for an update on my own case,
"Hi Brad
Has everything gone well with those hearings?
Thanks
This op-ed was the first time I publicly outed myself as a victim of Jeffrey Epstein's
sex trafficking operation. Before this, my civil case was filed under "Jane Doe 43". My
lawyers should not have pressured me to go public for the benefit of another
attorney.
I also would NOT IN A MILLION YEARS have put my name to the Op-Ed if I
knew Boies was photographed having dinner with Harvey Weinstein and his wife,
Bill and Hilary Clinton, on 13th December 2016. I was tricked and wholly used by
Boies Shiner, Brad and Stan.
An article in The American Lawyer dated January 8, 2018, reads: "After first outing
herself to defend David Boies in a letter to The New York Times,
is
giving up the pseudonym "Jane Doe 43" in a sex trafficking lawsuit against
billionaire Jeffrey Epstein."
I would also like to point out that I again used David Boies and Co after the Op-Ed
was published.
On 25Th November 2017, again on a Saturday, Stan asked to use my Affidavit in
a bar proceeding which had nothing to do with my own litigation. How could I not
give permission when there were no updates on my litigating? I was desperate and
they knew it.
"Hi,
17
EFTA00145622
There is another possible use of your short affidavit, that is, in addition to the filing
of it in the federal district court case against Epstein, and in addition to filing of it in
the Florida Bar proceeding.
It is possible that we will want to show your affidavit to a reporter for the
Washington Post who is writing about Dershowitz. I assume that your telephone
permission for us as your attorneys to file or use your affidavit as we deem useful
remains agreeable, but I'd appreciate your confirming that in a reply to this email.
If the affidavit is used and gets attention in the Washington Post, or elsewhere, we
will, of course, let you know.
Hope all is well and you are enjoying the start of the holiday season.
Sending best,
Stan"
On 25th November 2017, I responded to Stan's request,
"Stan
All agreed
S"
On 25th November 2017, Stan sends another email,
"Hi,
We talked earlier about David Boies' filing one of your two affidavits--the "second,"
shorter version you signed at the U.S. embassy--that is, the affidavit with the less
specific description of your encounter with Dershowitz--and you were fine with
that. (Actually, as I recall, you said Boies Schiller had permission to file either
affidavit.)
I'm sending this email to confirm your permission to file the affidavit.
To refresh your recollection, this affidavit has been filed in your case against Epstein,
and we suspect that Dershowitz has seen it, courtesy of Epstein. The forum in the
present case is different: instead of filing it in a federal court case, it will be filed in a
proceeding before the Florida State Bar. That proceeding is confidential, so the
affidavit itself should remain confidential.
Hope all is well. Drop a line confirming, if you would.
Sending best,
Stan"
On 25th November 2017, I again responded to Stans's request,
18
EFTA00145623
"Hi Stan
Yes as previously stated please proceed to file the affidavit
S"
On 25th November 2017, Stan wrote again,
I sent you an email seeking your express written permission to use one or both of
your affidavits (signed at the U.S. embassy) in connection with a Florida Bar
proceeding. There is a near-identical proceeding before the District of Columbia bar
as well. If you grant permission to use your affidavits in the Florida bar proceeding,
would you be kind enough to reply to this email granting use of the affidavits in the
D.C. bar proceeding as well?
Many thanks.
Stan"
On 25th November 2017, I once again responded,
"Stan
Yes agreed
S"
I have no idea what this bar proceeding was about but again couldn't decline even if I
wanted to!
I would like to point out that the New York Bar Association's Rules of Professional
Conduct state that
"loyalty and independent judgement are essential aspects of a lawyer's
relationship with a client"
"The professional judgement of a lawyer should be exercised, within the
bounds of the law, solely for the benefit of the client and free from
compromising infuences and loyalties".
By Boies and Co pressuring me to do the deposition for
Op-Ed and get
involved in another bar proceeding that had nothing to do with me and my case is a
direct violation of this rule. They put their own interests above me, the client, and
they violated their duty of loyalty to me.
I have also been told by Lisa EIM a documentary producer at Netflix, that
representatives of Boies Schiller told her not to interview me for a documentary,
despite me wanting to do the interview and tell my story despite me still being a
client of theirs. This is a direct violation of the duty of loyalty to their client, me.
19
EFTA00145624
Lisa said that someone from Boies Schiller informed her that I was "a drunk" who
was not credible and should not be interviewed. I have heard that this was also said
to other journalists whom I cannot name.
I would like to clarify this and have the witnesses back me up; I DID NOT TOUCH
ONE DROP OF ALCOHOL FOR THREE AND A HALF YEARS UNTIL I
MET THAT HORRIBLE BUNCH OF HUMANS!!! FACT!!
I did not drink when Brad and Stan came to Barcelona in January 2017, nor did I
drink when I was in New York for the I did deposition for
. They knew I was a
recovering alcoholic. Due to their inrPecant GASLIGHTING, GHOSTING AND
USING ME TIME AND TIME AGAIN FOR THEIR OWN PURPOSES, I WAS IN
HIDING IN FEAR OF MY LIFE FOR TWO YEARS; what did they expect? Strategic, I
think so.
Again, I would like to remind you that the New York Bar Association's Rules of
Professional Conduct state that "loyalty and independent judgement are
essential aspects of a lawyer's relationship with a client"
"The professional judgement of a lawyer should be exercised, within the
bounds of the law, solely for the benefit of the client and free from
compromising influences and loyalties".
It is a massive betrayal for a lawyer to speak this way about their client and attempt
to smear the reputation of someone they should be protecting and fighting for. I also
heard directly from Vicky Ward that Vanity Fair journalist herself that David had
told her a lot about me when she approached me at Ghislaine Maxwell's trial in
December 2021. I was in tears and very upset after that encounter which every
journalist, including Bob, my lawyer in the overflow room, could confirm.
Linked to this, I feel that Boies Schiller was generally trying to discourage me from
publicly telling my story. Stan Pottinger wrote to me on 9 November 2018, when
he knew I was recovering from a very serious suicide attempt linked to the re-
traumatisation of my civil case:
"Just a note here to let you know that we have entered a sensitive period when none
of us—and least of all you, our star plaintiff—can speak to the press about anything.
If you get an inquiry from anyone, simply tell them to call me or Sigrid, but do NOT
give them anything further. They may ask for innocuous things—Like, Are you okay?
Are you the person who filed the suit against Epstein? Did you recently go to a
hospital?—all things that have simple and straightforward answers but cannot be
answered by you. DON'T GIVE THEM ANYTHING, literally."
Was this to benefit me and my litigating?? I think not. The New York Intelligencer,
on 30th September 20181 published the article, "The Bad, Good Lawyer -
20
EFTA00145625
Was David Boies just doing right by Harvey Weinstein? Or did he cross
an ethical line?".
I didn't see the article as I had my suicide attempt on 5th October 2018 and
remained in hospital for three weeks and didn't have access to any communication,
so I wouldn't have seen the article and was in no fit state to talk to anyone, never
mind a journalist.
Living in Spain was also tricky following US-related articles as there are restrictions
to information on US-related matters within the media.
Boies and Co knew my feelings about Weinstein and the Clintons due to their
involvement with Epstein and Co. They also knew I would have gone entirely berserk
big time if I had found out about the article then, never mind now. This was said to
prevent me from finding out about the article!
Next, I accuse Boies and Co of perverting the course of justice in my own
litigation. Not only was I told by my attorneys under no circumstances to go to the
FBI because all my evidence would disappear" when I first came forward, but Boies
Schiller and Co, DID NOT correctly represent my interests dm. almost two
se ti,
litigation of my civil case against Epstein, Maxwell,
and
and worked completely against my interests. As far as I know, they did not
take a single deposition in n
m irase. They did not even take a deposition from me,
despite my testimony in
case.
I'm also aware that no depositions have been recorded on my case docket, case
number 1:17-cv-00616-JG. Perhaps because none were taken, which I'm sure
Boise and Co will clarify.
This is highly unusual, considering
docket is full of recorded depositions
which took place in all her civil suits whilst being represented by Boies and Co.
After two years of litigation, I was told by Stan Pottinger that I should settle early to
keep legal costs low.
In an email dated 27 November 2018, which I can produce, Pottinger advised me:
"We are just on the verge of racking up larger costs as the case comes closer to trial,
and there will be more depositions, more travel, the retention of expert witnesses,
and the like. But right now, neither side has accumulated big costs. Which suggests
this is a time to settle if settlement is a possibility."
The case was then settled in mid-December 2018. I i00% regret accepting the
settlement offer, and I feel that I was pressured to accept the settlement like I was
pressured to do everything else for Boies and Co, which I did not understand at the
time but, make no mistake understand now. Growing older and wiser has its
benefits. Once again, I was tricked and deceived. From what I understand, my trial
was due to begin in March 2019.
21
EFTA00145626
I was in NO fit state to make significant life decisions when Boies Schiller brought
me the settlement offer and pressured me to accept it. I was recovering from a severe
suicide attempt when Boies Schiller came to me with the proposal. I was heavily
medicated and in a wheelchair with two broken feet and a fractured back after
jumping off my balcony. Boies Schiller's lawyers, and Stan Pottinger, were aware of
my condition, which I can prove by producing emails from them discussing my
injuries. I do not think I should have been advised to accept the settlement in such a
vulnerable and highly medicated state. I have no memory of signing the settlement
agreement.
Two days before my suicide attempt, Sigrid contacts me asking about
who is now Edwards and Pottinger's client.
On o3 October 2018 Sigrid writes to me,
"Hi
— we were reviewing the flight logs in preparation
•p
u. coming
depositions and we see that the log reflects you flew with
=.
Do you
recognize her from the photo below? She was photographed coming out of Epstein's
New York apartment."
This Article is from the Daily Mail, published January 18, 2016.
(it
is reported she is a chef) is on the flight logs a few times, including on flight # 1919
with
On the 4th of October 2018, one day before my suicide attempt, I respond to Sigrid,
"Yes of course
thats M.
M, ■
Jeffery.
and I were all very friendly in the beginning of me being introduced to
We all traveled regularly together and when we were not with Jeffery, in his mansion
the three of us hung out in NY, especially at that club Quo and sometimes met for
coffee. She too, was also very good friends of
. At that point, I felt like I
had found my tribe and very blessed to have found some "good friends".
However when Jeffery and Ghislian picked up that, M,
and I had got too
friendly and started sharing secrets and a forming a, "sort of bond", we were
seperated and I never saw them again. After a point they made little effort to contact
me, which I thought was strange.
I now know that the friendship that I thought I had with .
and
was fake
and based on lies and deceit to recruit me for Jeffery. I also later found out that
had been paid for introducing me to Jeffery.
I seemed to get on very well with
same as
(they both also regularly
showed me how Jeffery liked to be massaged) but knew her only as .
and
surnames were never allowed to be disclosed.
22
EFTA00145627
She was one of
"best friends", whom was also progressing with her life and
career through the aid and help of Jeffery. In the beginning, they made everything
seem legit, almost like my dream had come true as theirs had through meeting
Jeffery. That everything was above board and that Jeffery was some amazing
philanthropist. They made me feel like he was my saviour as he was theirs too
She soothed and comforted me in the `early days' when we were together especially
on the Island, because after every time I was abused by Jeffery, I was extremely
upset, and over whelmed with emotions and physically sore. She was one of the girls
whom I thought was my friend and trusted.
and
normalised and glamourized what was going on and something we
had to do otherwise we would be thrown off the Island if we didn't participate. I
knew in my heart they were wrong but didn't know they were both wolves in sheeps
clothing, with one agenda.
She too, was called to give Jeffery massages daily, however was somehow
emotionally close to him and diligently did everything he asked of her. She and
said this sexual behaviour was normal
it was by no means "normal" the
things I and we had done to us.
I trusted her and she betrayed me, like
Do we know any of the deposition dates yet? Also have you heard any news on that
special date of release?
Kind Regards
On the 8th of October 2018, Peter, my ex-partner, wrote to Sigrid,
"Hi Sigrid
It's Peter,
has had a serious accident and broken both of her feet and is having
an MRI scan this afternoon to determine the condition of her vertebra. It appears the
spinal cord is ok
She has her phone with her and I am with her also . We are both on whatsapp app
too
Peter"
On the 8th of October 2018, Sigrid responded to Peter,
"I am just getting out of my hearing now. I know it is late there — how is
doing? I am so sorry this happened to her. Are the doctors taking good care of her? I
can't believe she broke both of her feet that is horrible!
23
EFTA00145628
Please let me know the info on the hospital so I can send something to her. I am so
sorry she is suffering.
All my best
Sigrid"
On the 9 th of October 2018, Peter responded to Sigrid,
"Hello Sigrid
I think it's best we talk today with
so you understand the real story and
implications for the trial
She has seen the psychiatrist this morning which I initiated
I think if I put you in direct contact with him and you liase with Stefan too
Anyway let's discuss
Regards
Peter"
On the loth of October 2018, Peter wrote an update to Sigrid and Stan,
"Hello
To keep you up to date :
S will have an MRI scan on her back today she will then have a brace fitted,subject to
scan results.
I insisted a s chiatrist visit with her toda and as a result
flowing scan resu ts.
is is great news or er as s e wi at ast, e correctl dia osed and given the best
treatment so she move forward with her life. Th
as been briefed and I
can give you contact details at the appropriate time.
Presently I have been told she will not be able to travel until January,earliest, but still
have to wait scan results
Please contact me for anything you need and you have S contact details also
She is being well loved and cared for .
Peter
things positive to"
On the 12th of October 2018, Peter gives Sigrid an update,
"Hello
Good neaan
shows fracture of lower vertebrae no surgery required
She will have a plaster cast for 2 months on her waist then a more flexible one for a
few months
Her feet casts will be on for 3 months then she will need rehabilitation to walk
correctly For a few months
Next Wednesda
le we is very p ease w r ie ou come la con
lave een so muc r worse.
As usual I am available and S is on direct
24
EFTA00145629
Regards
Peter"
On 12th October 2018, Sigrid responded to Peter's email,
"Thank you for the update and the positive news."
On 12th October 2018, Peter updated Sigrid,
"Hello
Good new'
shows fracture of lower vertebrae no surgery required
She will have a plaster cast for 2 months on her waist then a more flexible one for a
few months
Her feet casts will be on for 3 months then she will need rehabilitation to walk
As usual I am available and S is on direct
Regards
Peter "
On rth October 2018, Peter updated Sigrid,
"Hi Sigrid
I will inform
he is not
allowed to have a phone but I visit each day 4 to 8 Barca time, and she is available on
my phone number.I will let you know when she is due to leave and there are clear
timeframes to work with.
I'll let you know when your gift basket arrives
Best wishes
Peter"
On the 29th of October 2018, I wrote to Stan, Sigrid and Brad about my
medication,
"Hi Stan,
As requested per our last conversation , here is a list of the medication I was on
before the suicide attempt:
I have been prescribed the following medication to treat the:
25
EFTA00145630
This is what I have been diagnosed with during my recent excursion.
I am now on the following medication:
I have attached the hospital records marked A & B.
Kindest Regards
On 29th October 2018, Stan responded,
"Thanks for the info,
. This is all we need on this. Hope all is going well. I don't
know these particular drugs, but I can see that the ones you are taking now are
totally different from the ones you were taking before. Best wishes for a speedy foot
recovery. You have my sympathies. S"
What I also find peculiar is that I was asked by Sigrid to hand over all my email
passwords so that Boies Shiller could access all my emails and view all my private
correspondence. I didn't question it then, but I don't think this is standard
procedure. To this day, I have no idea how long they have been monitoring my email
accounts.
I haven't gone through my correspondence emails with Boies and Co for years until
now. I feel this was a com lete invasion of m
riva . I also wouldn't have
questioned it becaus
ven if I had
questioned it, I again wou
ave a no option ut to an over my private email
accounts, which had nothing to do with my own litigation case. Please note that I
have not included, for obvious reasons, my email account details in the
correspondence.
26
EFTA00145631
On the 29th October 2018, I wrote to Sigrid,
"Hi Sigrid,
I hope you had a good weekend?
I'm going back to the trumatology unit at the hospital on the 31st October to get
some x-rays on my feet and to change my bandages. The doctors will then be able to
give me a definite timeline on travel.
I am guessing that I won't be able to travel until Feb '19 for my deposition due to me
currently being completely wheelchair bound and will then need physiotherapy to
walk again. This is a month before the trail. Is this ok and will this delay the trial
date? I will confirm this after my appointment. Please can you let me know as I don't
want anything to delay the 15th March '19.
Also please can I request the deposition to be held in Miami at your offices. I find
travelling to New York quite stressful as I have massive flashbacks and find the whole
thing extremely unpleasant and feel it would be good to do the depositions on your
turf. Please can you confirm this. Due to the accident, I am unable to travel on my
own due to me needing assistance, so Peter will have to travel with me. Please
confirm that this is ok?
As per our conversation last week, please find below the links and email username
and passwords for the email accounts that I have used throughout the years:
There is also correcpondance saved on the lap top that I handed in the beginning. I
think the London Office collected it.
I'm really not sure how I feel about what the defence side are asking of me. Surely
my emails to certain people are private and have nothing to do with the case and my
correspondence to my family and Peter will remain Private?"
On 29th October 2018 Sigrid responded,
"Thanks
— sorry for the delay I am having a crazy day.
We are going to object to the discovery that gets into the personal issues and we will
ultimately have to fight that out before the Judge. The defendants will argue it is
relevant because for example, you discussed in your depo in the Maxwell case how
Epstein/Maxwell spoke to your parents while you were in South Africa and assured
them everything was fine etc. We will do our very best to limit what they get.
Don't stress about the depo timing yet. David did alert them that you had an injury
and might have difficulty traveling so we will figure it out. Discovery closes on
January 25th— meaning all depositions have to be complete by that date to keep the
27
EFTA00145632
March 15th trial date. Again —please don't worry about that right now — just focus on
your healing. We will figure everything else out on our end.
I was working this weekend on the deposition outline for Maxwell's deposition
which is coming up on November 8th in NY. Sandy was able to dig up a lot of old
public information putting Maxwell in NY city during the same time you were there
in the statute of limitations period of February 2007 — May 2007 — so Maxwell can't
claim she was not there because we have pictures!
All my best and please just focus on getting healthy. We will work on the rest."
Why on earth, after almost two years of litigation, was everything left to that last
minute? They had ample time to make discoveries!! Again, as per my case docket, no
depositions were done. Why? Again, I had enough evidence to prosecute the whole
lot of them! All I wanted was justice for myself and to stop more rapes from
happening. After my death threat, I even told Sigrid I would crawl to Miami if I had
to do my deposition to make the discovery in time for my own trial on the 15th of
March 2019.
On the 30th of October 2018, I told Sigrid about my death threat. Again, I had just
been released from the hospital after my suicide attempt,
"Hi Sigrid,
Please can I call you later.
My circumstances have changed due to me receiving a death threat glued on my front
door. Also I have had both car tyres slashed and electricity wires cut. The police are
involved and I'm terrified. So upset, the letter said we and the dog will be murdered
in one week.
We are looking at new properties next week.
Regarding deposition, even if I have to crawl to Miami to do my deposition I will do
so before the 25th January '19. Please, I beg of you, this trial cannot be delayed
anymore. It has to stay the 15th March."
Regarding Igor's deposition in my litigation, why was his deposition never done?
When I questioned what was happening with Igor, Epstein's long-term bodyguard,
who in January 2017 confirmed in person to Brad that I tried to swim off the island
in distress deposition, Sigrid responded,
On the 14th of November 2018, Sigrid said concerning Igor's deposition,
"Hi
— it was a bit of a fiasco — Brad went clear up to Palm Beach and then Igor
was sick so they had to reschedule for this Tuesday. Brad was obviously really upset
28
EFTA00145633
because it took time to prepare and he wasted time on the drive both ways but at
least all parties agreed (including Igor) to have the depo take place this Tuesday.
Do you want to speak briefly now - or connect tomorrow morning?"
I was forced to move house on the 24th of November 2018 whilst in a wheelchair
with two broken feet, nails in my feet and a fractured back due to a death threat
pinned on my front door, cut electricity cable and slashed tyres in the home where
we had been in hiding for two years. I notified Sigrid immediately about what had
happened and lodged a police complaint on the 31st of October 2018. I have the
police complaint form, which will be included in my evidence against Boies and Co.
Boies and Co knew I was in no fit state to do anything, let alone make a serious
decision, but they knew I would have crawled, if need be, to get justice for what
happened to me and others.
For example, please see the below correspondence:
On the 19th of November 2018, I wrote to Sigrid and Brad,
"Hi Sigrid,I was at the hospital today getting my bandages changed as I snapped my
cast on one of my feet. All good now and whilst I was there asked them about the
doctors note. I have an appointment at 12pm tomorrow with the doctor to get the
note confirming my foot issues and travel dates. Unfortunately it will be in Spanish
but you'll have that by tomorrow. You also have the Traumatology an '
records which shows my injuries. My personal preference is to do thedeposition
early-mid January as I am still in pain, healing and find it very difficult moving about
in a wheel chair and including incredibly tiring, never mind doing a deposition on
top of that. The doctor will confirm that I am wheelchair bound in his note. I also
also starting to move house in the next week, which I have no idea how I will manage
but at this moment in time I don't think I will be able to handle doing the deposition
before Christmas. There is time in January? Please please can you do your best to
delay my deposition until I am well and able."
On 19th November 2018, Sigrid wrote,
"Thanks for the update
and I am so sorry to hear about the cast. In addition to
the travel could you see if the doctor could add into the note that the injuries are very
painful and you will not be in a position to do anything that involves work, including
sitting through a deposition? (Or maybe someone else on the team has better
language to propose). It is fine if it is in Spanish — we can get it translated."
Sigrid later that day wrote,
"Hello
— We informed Epstein/Maxwell's counsel that you are not able to
travel next week to NY due to your injury. As expected, they are requesting a doctor's
note. Are you able to get a simple note from the doctor that is dealing with your foot
issues that says you broke both of your feet and are not able to travel until Mid
January? Please don't have them put a lot of detail in it — just a simple note from the
doctor or hospitalAs you cannot travel, we offered that they could take the
29
EFTA00145634
deposition in Spain as an alternative. We are waiting to hear back from them on
those possible arrangements. Thank you and hope you are doing great,"
On 20th November 2018, Sigrid asked,
"1=
-could you ask your doctor to please include a statement that the issues with
your broken feet cause you significant pain and make tasks requiring concentration,
like a deposition, very difficult and they should be avoided until you have been
cleared by the doctor which will likely be in mid January Thank you."
On 18TH December 2018, Sigrid wrote to me regarding my settlement offer, "Hello
— as we have been discussing over the past few days, attached is the final
settlement agreement for review and execution by you. While I know I went over the
terms with you on the phone, please take a moment to review the document. We need
to have your signature "notarized". I have a morning appointment out of the office
so I will not be in the office until it oo a.m. EST. Unless Brad is able to arrange
something with you for earlier in the morning -- my plan will be to call you at 11:OO
a.m. on What's Ap Face Time and have the notary with me and she will watch you
execute the document. Then I will need you to scan the signature page back to me so
I can serve it on the other side. So happy we are able to bring this to a conclusion for
you."
I never had the chance to do my deposition in my own case because of my severe
injuries, so how can I then be encouraged to sign a settlement agreement before I
eared by the doctor, as per Sigrid's communication? My mother father and
threatened to be deposed. They knew that my
couldn't be deposed, and they knew under no circumstances did I
involved. This was made clear in
deposition that I would do
anything and everything to protect them.
I felt utterly trapped, and they did nothing to support or protect m family or me.
The news of my loved ones being deposed was given to me after
wouldn't have been allowed to talk to them if they were deposed, precisely when I
needed them the most after trying to end my life.
I tried to commit suicide on 5th October 2018 because of how Boies Schiller, Brad
and Stan Pottinger treated me and because I was also in hiding due to fear of being
harmed. I knew Jeffrey was after me; the lawyers did nothing to protect me.
What I've now come to realise is that the whole time I was being represented by
Boies Shiner and Co I was constantly gaslighted and ghosted with my own
litigation, but when they wanted something from me always seemed to find a way to
contact me, even on a Saturdays.
Right from the start I knew I wouldn't be represented fairly when I wrote to Stan
after I did that
deposition. This toxic relationship has continued since then.
30
EFTA00145635
Gaslighting is a severe form of psychological abuse which continued for years. I guess
from the very first call in October 2016.
Gaslighting is a form of manipulation in an abusive relationship where the bully or
abuser misleads the target, creating a false narrative and making them question their
own judgments and reality. Ultimately the victim of gaslighting starts to feel unsure
about their own perceptions of the world and even wonder if they are losing their
sanity.
Gaslighting is usually carried out by the abuser over an extended period which makes
the victim question the validity of their own thoughts, perception of reality, or
memories and typically leads to confusion, loss of confidence and self-esteem, the
uncertainty of one's emotional or mental stability and a dependency on the
perpetrator.
Boies Schiller, Stan and Brad were incredibly uncommunicative during my case and
would ghost me for weeks at a time, despite my desperate attempts to get updates
from them. They knew, from many emails that I can produce, that I was incredibly
distressed by their lack of contact, but they continued to ignore me.
They also knew I was generally in a highly vulnerable and traumatised state and
continued to ignore me, which added to my distress. I would like to remind you that
this is a sex trafficking case in which I and others were raped repeatedly. Going on to
psychologically abuse and use rape victims for their own benefit is criminal and
unforgivable.
My then-partner,elso wrote to Sigrid on July 16, 2019, to express my
disappointment at Boies Schiller's lack of communication. He wrote:
"I'm writing because
is feeling terribly left out and left behind after her years of
anguish to help to be heard."
On March 24, 2017, I wrote in an email to my lawyers:
"Please can someone call and let me know what's going on.?
> If I'm not of value or I have done something wrong, tell me. I am a big girl.
> Please stop giving me the silent treatment as it not fair on me, and I'm very upset
about it, and it's increasingly stressful my end being kept in the dark or having
almost zero communication.
31
EFTA00145636
> Stan, I phoned you in tears last Thursday night, and you promised to call me back
the next day.
> It not cool, especially under the circumstances, but I do understand you guys are
very busy and working long hours. I don't know what to do anymore or where I'm at
or anything.
> Please call me?"
On November 17, 2017, I wrote to Brad Edwards in an email:
"I havent heard back from you for weeks now. Has something happened, are ypu ok?
I dont know what else to think really?
Please can you get in touch with me. Im loosing my mind waiting to have some for of
communication??"
I felt extremely betrayed when Brad Edwards sent me an abusive email that also
attacked my credibility. In response ab
asking if my deposition — which I had
never wanted to give — had helped MIM case, Brad said:
"I know you want to know and understand the truth, so it is important that we
provide you with the absolutely truth. Your initial testimony helped. However, when
the Callahan emails were produced the other side moved to take your deposition
again (a motion that was not ruled upon because the case settled) and they informed
the court that you were a liar and should be stricken completely from the witness list
because you could not be believed about anything. Again, we have no idea how the
Court would have ruled on that issue. We understand the Callahan situation but like
we told you when we received the emails, they are bad. So while your appearance as a
witness initially helped, the power of your testimony was deflated greatly by he
emails. We expect that those emails are going to be used in your case to discredit
your testimony in the same way. Not only by the parties but by anyone else you
identify... Again, Stan and I understand your explanation for what you said in the
emails, but we are not the judge or jury or the defense. Those people don't know you,
and the emails give them many reasons not to believe you."
In further evidence of how my lawyers disparaged me, I remember Stan saying
during a phone call that I was "turning tricks", which I found extraordinarily
demeaning and belittling. I recorded this in an email to him the same day, 18
September 2018, which I can produce. In that email, I wrote to him:
"Stan, is that what you think i was doing on my trip to Miami? Turning Tricks? I
You mentioned that term in our telephone call as to why i went on my trip to
Miami.
'TURNING TRICKS'? Do actually know what that means, and if so, why are you
representing my in a sex trafficking case if you have that opinion of me. I
appreciate ypur honesty though.
I find that term not only derogatry but insulting and disrespect;
to me as one of
your clients.
I didn't turn tricks, i tried to survive, for your information.
Not cool.
32
EFTA00145637
In addition to the above, I recently discovered that David Boies had a close personal
relationship with Bill Clinton. I know this because of a recently resurfaced photo of
Boies having an intimate dinner with Bill, Hillary Clinton, Harvey Weinstein, and his
wife in December 2016. It was reportedly a consolation dinner after Hillary
Clinton lost the 2016 presidential election.
I want to be very clear: I consider Bill Clinton a co-conspirator of Jeffrey Epstein's,
and I would never, ever, ever have allowed Boies or his firm to represent me if I had
known that he had a personal friendship with the Clintons. When Epstein was luring
me into his abuse and sex trafficking scheme, he frequently bragged about his dose
friendship with Bill Clinton and Donald Trump. In my mind, this gave Epstein
credibility and is one of the primary reasons I trusted him.
I was very explicit with Boies Schiller when I first met with them — via a conference
phone call held in Boies Schiller Flexner's office in Fort Lauderdale in October
2016, where Sigrid, Meredith Shultz and her paralegal Sandy Perkins were present —
that the reason I decided to come forward about my abuse by Epstein was that I was
so traumatised by seeing Hillary Clinton running for president and knowing as I did
that Bill Clinton was a co-conspirator. The lawyers knew this prompted me to come
forward but did not disclose that David Boies had a close personal friendship with
Bill Clinton, a vast and unforgivable conflict of interest.
What is also unforgivable is how Boies and his firm have alsiariesented fellow
Epstein and Maxwell rape survivor and dose friend
She was
trafficked in September 2002 with the aid of Bill Clinton when he joined Epstein
and Maxwell, Kevin Space and Chris Tucker in Cape Town, South Africa.
was told that she would get a modelling contract through Karen Models,
owned and run by Jean Luc Brunel and financed by Epstein, to work as a model for
Victoria's Secret.
Another dose friend and colleague of Epstein's. She would NOT have been trafficked
and raped repeatedly by Epstein if Bill Clinton had not been there several times when
she met Epstein. Who wouldn't feel safe with an ex-president lurking around,
shaking her hand, and talking to her?
David Boies had an obligation to disclose to
and me, as his clients,
that he had a close relationship with Bill Clinton; as soon as I revealed that Clinton's
media profile around the presidential election was the entire reason, I came forward
to look for justice.
The article in question, which has magically reappeared out of thin air (Boies has
recently annoyed Google by successfully suing them), was published on 3o
September 2018, "The Bad, Good Lawyer — Was David Boies just doing right by
Harvey Weinstein? Or did he cross an ethical line? "
The answer is YES!!! A humongous, gigantic ethical line that has caused severe and
lasting emotional trauma impacts me and others.
33
EFTA00145638
Upon my further investigation into Boies and his dodgy dealings, I have found the
following:
• It's been reported that David Boies left his firm Cravath, Swaine & Moore due
to foul play to then start his own law firm with his friend Jonathan. Thus,
Boies Shiller & Flexner was born in 1997.
"In 1997, after 3o years and one-too many conflicts of interest, he left the firm and
took with him one of its biggest clients — George Steinbrenner, the owner of the New
York Yankees."
•
Following the 2000 U.S. Presidential Election, Boies represented Al Gore in
Bush V Gore. I would like to point out the obvious, Al Gore, at that time, was
Vice President to Bill Clinton (David Boies long-term good friend as shown in
the picture of him having dinner with the Clintons in 2016). I would be
interested to find out if he also represented Bill Clinton in his impeachment
after he had sexual relations with Monica Lewinsky, who was 24 at the time.
Clear abuse of power, in my opinion. I'm also aware that Epstein was one of
Clinton's biggest beneficiaries, as reported in ABC News on 12/06/2019 -
"Jeffrey Epstein donated to several Democrats throughout 1990's and early 2000's".
Epstein is said to have donated $20,000 in 1999 to Senate hopeful Hilary Clinton
through her joint fundraising committee with the Democratic Party".
was trafficked to Epstein from the summer of 2000 - September 2002.
She mentioned in her unsealed memoir "The Billionaire's Playboy Club", which has
been used as evidence in many cases that she saw then-presidential candidate Al
Gore and President Bill Clinton on the island; please see pages 109 and no in the
attached memoir.
There are also numerous flight logs to confirm that Bill Clinton was a regular on
Epstein's plane and to his island St Little James during this time frame. Bush V Gore
was argued in the Supreme Court on 11 December woo and decided 12 December
2000, and David was the lawyer. David would have been well aware of his client's
movements (Al Gore) and his friend bill Clinton, especially during that time with
going to a well-known rapist's island.
It would be ludicrous to assume that even back then, David Boies did not know what
was going on and the probability of him interacting with
then is relatively
high, considering they all are close friends and in the same circle. I also am confused
as to how Boies Shiller could have represented
in her defamation case against
Ghislaine Maxwell from September 2015 — June 2017. She stated that she saw
Epstein and Maxwell co-conspirators Bill Clinton and Al Gore on the island. So how
can Boies then have an intimate dinner with the co-conspirators in December 2016
and represent an Epstein victim simultaneously?
reportedly received a
handsome financial settlement.
I would also like to highlight the hypocrisy of the ferocious smear campaign against
only Prince Andrew, Monarchy and the United Kingdom by Boies and Co, which was
34
EFTA00145639
and is boarder lining on extremism now I know about his friendship and ties to the
Clintons, who are co-conspirators of Epstein and co. I also made this very clear to
Sigrid on 22nd February 2020.
"Hi Sigrid, I'm sorry to bother you on the weekend however I'm not happy. As a
victim who was raped repeatedly, lent out etc With the evidence to prove it, I'm very
concerned by Gloria Allred's performance yesterday. I would like to ask as client if
Boise Shiller is in any way shape or form affiliated with Gloria Allred, her law firm,
and Lisa Bloom and her law firm? I would please, as a client, ask for complete
honesty and transparency to my very entitled question.I'm not impressed at all and
I'm sure every other victim except for
is extremely offended and starting to
ask questions on the lawyers representing us and agendas. I really would like
transparency so I can understand what I'm earth is going on. I didn't come forward
and neither did any other victim in my experience since 2016, come forward to be
used as political pawns. I and every other victim not connected with
and her
story are getting really frustrated and annoyed. What is going on? Must I hire a big
bus driving up to the White House for all the US defendants involved?"
On 22nd February 2020, Sigrid Responded,
"Hello
— If you are referring to the article that I saw yesterday with Gloria
Allred hiring a bus with a sign about Prince Andrew — that was her doing
exclusively. Ms. Allred has her own clients and we are not affiliated with her or her
actions in that regard nor her daughter Lisa Bloom. If I am mistaken and you are
referring to something else she has done please forward me whatever it is you would
like me to review.feel free to call me if you want to discuss anything."
That is a complete lie saying they are not affiliated with Bloom because on the 3rd
February 2020, The Hollywood Reporter wrote,
"Attorneys Lisa Bloo
and David Bo' s are asking a California federal judge to
dismiss a lawsuit from
at claims they and other Harvey
Weinstein "fixers" vio ate racketeering laws in an effort to make sure she didn't
include her claim that the producer raped her in her memoir-
The actress in October sued Weinstein, Boies and Bloom and private intelligence
agency Black Cube for allegedly engaging in a "diabolical and illegal" effort to
silence her"
They did the exact same to me and others and should NOT be allowed near sex
abuse survivors, never mind be practising lawyers. They have all viciously abused
their power on rape victims who had the bravery and courage to come forward like
me. This is NOT acceptable! They have betrayed our trust and lied to us all. Not only
this, but they also actively went out of their way to damage my reputation, which they
succeeded in whilst I was their client, which has caused me tremendous financial
harm.
Issas there solely an extraordinary and manic media and legal interest in
V Prince Andrew? Why has the focus on
been to the detriment of
myself and other survivors trying to bring down the known vital players involved in a
35
EFTA00145640
sex trafficking ring that spanned over three decades and saw hundreds if not
thousands of children and young women raped to justice?
Wi.f.om all the names mentioned in publications and legal documents, including
is Prince Andrew, the only man of stature who happens to be the son of Her
Royal Majesties son, our head of state, been pursued?
Why have other Senior Politicians, Heads of State, Commercial Billionaires, past
presidents, ex-prime ministers, senior scientists, owners of the most significant
software and search mediums on the planet etc, not been pursued, even if only to
understand why they watched and said nothing?
The fact that the United Kingdom has had buses around Buckingham, billboards in
the UK, and now enormous billboards in New York mocking ONY Prince Andrew for
a storage company raises many questions for me and should for others too as to what
was the agenda here?
One of the slogans was, "Safe, secure, protected with minimal charges. Just like
Prince Andrew". As a survivor of Epstein and co who have never had my own day in
court and with enough evidence against the main co-conspirators, I find this horrific.
On the 24th of July 2022 ) I was in New York for Ghislaine Maxwell's sentencing in
June, and whilst I was sitting enjoying a drink and mentally preparing to read my
Victim Impact Statement to the court and to Ghislaine, I read an article that was
published in the Daily Mail, " While Ghislaine Maxwell awaits her fate,
— her ex right-hand woman and third key figure in Jeffrey Epstein drama — strolls
carefree in Manhattan"
I froze with fear when I read that "She and her husband live in a £4.3million
penthouse in the trendy SoHo neighbourhood and also owns a £5.imillion
condominium in Miami".
I'm sitting in SoHo, and
lives in SoHo who could have walked past me
at any stage whilst I was there? She and
=,
whom I have hard and
unmistakable evidence, and so do other survivors who came forward, have never
been held accountable for their crimes. None of the other perpetrators except for
Maxwell have been held accountable. Why?
The reasons, in my mind, are very clear that this was politically driven at the highest
levels; why?
Boies and co also strategically timed the litigation of
V Prince Andrews
litigation so that the trial would happen during Her Royal Majesties' Platinum
Jubilee, which the whole country and world celebrated as the Queen is our longest
serving Monarch who has done a remarkable job in leading our country as our head
of state.
testimony would never be tried in court to outshine Her Royal
Majesties' celebration. Fact!
got another handsome settlement.
This is not right, and I cannot be silent anymore.
36
EFTA00145641
Please, I ask that an immediate investigation occur so that the other Epstein and
Maxwell sex trafficked survivors and I might have the freedom to live in peace, find
some form of happiness, and move on with our lives. All we ever wanted was justice
for all of us being raped. We didn't know by coming forward to "trusted" lawyers that
they, too, were co-conspirators themselves of the sex trafficking ring. They raped us
again, as did the system. We will NOT be Silenced anymore!
And I would like to clarify that I will not be intimidated or bullied, or "Silenced"
anymore by Boies and co. Who ARE the very co-conspirators I tried to bring to
justice!
I would also prefer not to have "Black Cube" on my doorstep tomorrow courtesy of
Boies or the US GOVERNMENT. Or have they always been around? Sex abuse
survivors have already been down this road before with Boies and Co, when Harvey
Weinstein's victims were silenced by Boies and co.
In your and my own exhaustive investigation, I'm sure this will be uncovered in-
depth. Then I, too, will sue the courts for the information to be discovered about all
these disgusting humans, which hopefully will be released to the public. Like the
deposition, I was manipulated, bribed and subjected, which ruined my life.
I also have the most amazing lawyers by my side, James Marsh and Robert Lewis.
They will keep any desperate attempts to discredit us to a minimum. We've been here
before, and it is dull now, considering my evidence against the sex trafficking ring
and all the key players involved. They should have all been arrested. I will also be
filing a suit against Boies and Co for the immeasurable emotional and financial
damage and distress they have caused.
I look forward to your immediate response and thank you for your time.
Yours Sincerely
37
EFTA00145642
Document Preview
PDF source document
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.
Extracted Information
Document Details
| Filename | EFTA00145606.pdf |
| File Size | 2920.9 KB |
| OCR Confidence | 85.0% |
| Has Readable Text | Yes |
| Text Length | 86,189 characters |
| Indexed | 2026-02-11T10:54:17.193326 |