Back to Results

EFTA00151744.pdf

Source: DOJ_DS9  •  Size: 307.8 KB  •  OCR Confidence: 85.0%
PDF Source (No Download)

Extracted Text (OCR)

From: " S . . Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 18:33:37 +0000 Importance: Normal Looks like it's another client who was arrested, but we will keep everyone posted on scheduling. Sent from my iPhone On Jul 15, 2019, at 2:31 PM, Comet', Maurene (USANYS) rote: Begin forwarded message: From: Michael Bachne Date: July 15 2019 at 1.111 Subject: Re: Epstein investigation / I was just notified that a client was arrested and is being arraigned in Queens County tomorrow on a state O charge at about 11 or 1130. I'm concerned that the 330 may be cutting it close. It may be better to do it at four or on Wednesday. Please advise Michael Bachner Bachner & Associates PC Please excuse typographical errors. Messages sent through dictation. [X] https://vvww.actl.corn/ NOTICE: The information contained in this communication is legally privileged and/or confidential information, which is intended only for use of recipient. If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient (or the agent or employee responsible to deliver it to the intended (recipient), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this EFTA00151744 communication by error, please immediately notify the sender by e-mail and delete this email from your system. Nothing in this email should be construed as a legal opinion or tax advice. wrote: Thanks very much. Let's plan for tomorrow at 3:30pm. You and can come to our office at 1 St. Andrews and just give security my name. Best Original Message From: Michael Bachner u ject: : pstem investigation Hi Maurene: Tomorrow or Wednesday at 11 or 3:30. Thursday any time after 11:30 to 4. hftps://wwvv.actl.corn/ Michael Bachner, Esq. Bachner & Associates, PC CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE: This E-mail (including any attachments) is covered by the Electronic EFTA00151745 Communications Privacy Act, 18 USC Sections 2510-2521, is confidential, and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. Please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error and then delete it. Thank you. O " ' From: Sent: on ay. u Subject: Re: Epstein investigation / Apologies for the delay. Would you please let us know what times would work for you and in the next two or three days? We'll then figure out a time when we can all meet. Thank ou n I 11 2019 at 10:43 PM Michael Bachne wrote: HelloM 6 o'clock is somewhat late. The client lives in Connecticut and has children etc. Michael Bachner Bachner & Associates, PC 39 Broadway-Suite 1610 Please excuse typographical errors. Messages sent through dictation. [X] https://vvww.actl.corn/ NOTICE: The information contained in this communication is legally privileged and/or confidential information, which is intended only for use of recipient. If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient (or the agent or employee responsible to deliver it to the intended (recipient), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication by error, please immediately notify the sender by e-mail and delete this email from your system. Nothing in this email should be construed as a legal opinion or tax advice. n ul 11 2019 at 9.01 PM wrote: EFTA00151746 Would 7/16 at around 6pm work for the reverse proffer in our office at 1 St. Andrews? Thanks, From: Michael Bachner Subject: Re: Epstein investigation / Regarding the reverse proffer, We are available next week from the 15-18. I have a 2 o'clock meeting in my office on the 16th and 17th that should last an hour. So I can meet with you on those days at 11 or 1030 in the morning if that works. Please let me know Michael Bachner Bachner & Associates PC us y <--WRD000.jpg> https://www.actl.com/ ors. Messages sent through dictation. NOTICE: The information contained in this communication is legally privileged and/or confidential information, which is intended only for use of recipient. If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient (or the agent or employee responsible to deliver it to the intended (recipient), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication by error, please immediately notify the sender by e-mail and delete this email from your system. Nothing in this email should be construed as a legal opinion or tax advice. • ichael Bachne wrote: EFTA00151747 Sure. Michael Bachner Bachner & Associates, PC <--WRD000.jpg> ors. Messages sent through dictation. https://www.actl.com/ NOTICE: The information contained in this communication is legally privileged and/or confidential information, which is intended only for use of recipient. If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient (or the agent or employee responsible to deliver it to the intended (recipient), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication by error, please immediately notify the sender by e-mail and delete this email from your system. Nothing in this email should be construed as a legal opinion or tax advice. On Jul 10 2019 at 11:08 AM Mike, I think it would be useful to get a better understanding of your position—it would be helpful for us to know, for example, how much time you propose to take to evaluate matters, and whether we can provide any additional information that might be useful for that process of evaluation. That likely will affect our determination regarding the grand jury appearance, at which we would expect, were we to call to ask her a number of questions we would expect to argue to the court do not implicate a fifth amendment privilege—i.e., that she couldn't simply blanket invoke. Would it be useful to discuss via phone? thanks From: Michael Bachner Subject: Re: Epstein investigation / Dear Counsel: I met with wand I need time to evaluate matters. Re ardin the subpoena to testify before the Grand Jury on July 24, we hereby notify you that if called as a witness would invoke her Fifth Amendment privilege against compelled self-incrimination. Please let me know if you will require her to invoke in person or whether this communication suffices and no appertaining will be required. Yours truly, EFTA00151748 Michael Bachner Michael Bachner Bachner & Associates, PC Please excuse typographical errors. Messages sent through dictation. <—WRD026.jpg> https://vvwvv.actl.com/ NOTICE: The information contained in this communication is legally privileged and/or confidential information, which is intended only for use of recipient. If the reader of this communication is not the intended recipient (or the agent or employee responsible to deliver it to the intended (recipient), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication by error, please immediately notify the sender by e-mail and delete this email from your system. Nothing in this email should be construed as a legal opinion or tax advice. SANYS <mailto: Mr. Bachner, Following up on our conversation earlier this morning, we wanted to provide you with the additional information and materials we discussed. In the first instance, so that you have full contact info for the team, please feel free to reach out to any of us at any time; we're all available via email or at the following phone numbers: Additionally, attached are the non-prosecution agreement, previously publicly filed in civil proceedings in Florida, and a blank version of our standard proffer agreement, both as discussed. As we mentioned, please don't hesitate to reach out with any questions, and we look forward to setting a time to speak again after you're able to confer with Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of New York <blank proffer agreement.pdf> <Epstein NPA, dated 2007-09-24.pdf> EFTA00151749

Document Preview

PDF source document
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.

Document Details

Filename EFTA00151744.pdf
File Size 307.8 KB
OCR Confidence 85.0%
Has Readable Text Yes
Text Length 8,393 characters
Indexed 2026-02-11T10:56:01.660707
Ask the Files