EFTA00157113.pdf
PDF Source (No Download)
Extracted Text (OCR)
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject
Re: Eastern search warrant documenIsPaul
Date:
Tuesday, April 7, 2020 2:12:42 PM
Ok great,
see when they're available tomorrow.
SSA
FBI New York
On Apr 7, 2020 2:1 I PM, I1
)"
wrote:
I'm in tomorrow from 7:30 to 4. I'll be able to answer better from the office as I'll be able to
look at the evidence live. I'll make myself available whenever.
FBI NY CART Coordinator
Senior Examiner
From:
ct
>
Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2020 2:07:28 PM
To:
Cc:
Subject: FW: Epstein search warrant documen
I think a conference call would be appropriate for this, can you let me know if that works for you and
what day/time?
From:
(USANYS)
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2020 1:54 PM
To:
<
>';
(USANYS)
>;
)
(USANYS)
Cc:
(USANYS) [Contractor] ,c
>
(USANYS) <
>;
(USANYS) ‹
>;
Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents
Following up on this from a month ago — I know we're living in a different world than what existed
four weeks ago, but are you at all able to assist while working remotely? This has been pending for
3503-020
Page 1 of 7
SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17
EFTA_00001929
EFTA00157113
almost two months and we still don't have a very basic list of each device or item that was seized
and searched, or for which of those we've received materials. We're happy to have a call if that
would be useful, but as a first step the most basic thing we're looking for is the info in the template
spreadsheet we sent earlier (that's also attached).
thanks,
From:
(USANYS)
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2020 12:00
To:
(USANYS)
<
>;
(USANYS)
Cc:
(USANYS) (Contractor) •z
:t.;
(USANYS)
ma;
<
=';-(USANYS)
sz
)*;
Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents
Unfortunately I don't think this is very helpful to us. Did you take a look at the example spreadsheet
I sent on 2/24? The excel file you sent has descriptions that don't match up to the items listed in the
search warrant returns (that we sent on 2/23), and we don't have the 1B or CART numbers to be
able to cross-reference. We also can't tell what you mean by "loose media" without a specific
comparison to what was seized, we don't know which items you're referring to as "Windows
machines," and we can't tell whether the entirety of any particular item has been transferred, or just
partial. For example, it looks like we have gotten very, very few image files, which is surprising.
We have also encountered some very significant problems in trying to review the more than 1
million documents we recently received:
The data we've received has no way to put any emails and attachments together. So if an
email says, "see the attached flight records," for example, we have no way of linking that up
with the records themselves. Not only is that a big problem for us in review, it's going to be
a huge problem for producing the documents to defense counsel.
The load file has no link to the native file, so when we load the data to the database, there's
no way to have the native files show up in the database. Because many of the files are too
large to open in the viewer, it effectively means that there are many files that are completely
invisible to us.
Related, the control numbers in the load file don't match up to the native files. So we have
two sets of numbers and no way to match up anything—that is, even if we were to try to go
hunt down every individual large file in the native files, it would be impossible.
3503-020
Page 2 of 7
SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17
EFTA_00001930
EFTA00157114
So the data that we most recently got, we need to get in a form that addresses those issues, and we
likely will need to get a similar reproduction of the data we received a couple months ago.
Otherwise we're sifting through more than a million documents without much rhyme or reason.
I've re-attached the spreadsheet we sent last week— I think that's a good place to start in terms of
our necessary record-keeping, and we need that info at the very least, as well as anything else you
think would be useful. Also attaching the SW returns for reference. And again, we're happy to meet
up anytime and hash all this out in person if that's useful.
thanks,
From:
<
>
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2020 16:36
To:
(USANYS)
USANYS) <
>
Cc:
(USANYS) [Contractor] a;
(USANYS)
`1
:•;
(USANYS)
(USANYS)
Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents
Here is a listing of what I have already handed over in load files to the US Attorney's Office for taint
review. Some points of clarification: There were 9 IDE hard drives found in the Manhattan
apartment, they turned out to be 3 copies of 3 drives (9 drives in total) from a July 2007 search on
one of his properties. I only processed 3 (as they were all copies). All the loose media from the NY
apartment is included. All the Windows machines from the NY apartment are included. Only 2 Macs
from NY and 1 from the Island are included.
I will have to more closely coordinate with whoever is loading up Relativity with the
remaining Macs as the tool they have to be processed with does not easily re-name the load files.
Spreadsheet is attached.
NYO CART Coordinator
Senior Forensic Examiner
(office)
(cell)
From:
(USANYS) (
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2020 12:25 PM
To:
(USANYS)
(USANYS) <1
3503-020
Page 3 of 7
SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17
EFTA_0000 193 1
EFTA00157115
Cc:
(USANYS) [Contractor) <
>;
(USANYS) <->;
(USANYS)C
Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents
I could do Thursday morning, but I think it would be helpful for us to get the accounting in advance
of the meeting so we can figure out in advance what (if any) additional steps we need — is that
possible?
From:
)
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2020 09:59
To:
(USANYS)
(USANYS)
,USANYS)<
>
Cc:
(USANYS) [Contractor) <
>;
(USANYS)
(USANYS)
Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents
Can we do Thursday morning? My network should be back by then and I can give you a good
accounting.
NY CART Coordinator
Senior Forensic Examiner
cell
desk
On Mar 2, 2020 11:15 AM, '
wrote:
Doing the weekly check in on this — is there a time this week when everyone can meet on this?
(USANYS)"
thanks,
From:
(USANYS)
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2020 17:38
To:
(USANYS)
mcO
) an;
(USANYS)
Cc:
(USANYS) [Contractor]
Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents
(USANYS)
(USANYS)
3503-020
Page 4 of 7
SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17
EFTA_00001932
EFTA00157116
Totally understand about the network issues—we can relate. I do still think it will be helpful to all sit
down together to have an in-person discussion, to make sure everybody is on the same page. Are
folks available for that next week? And what I think would be most helpful to facilitate that would
be a spreadsheet of each separate device referenced in the two search warrant returns, with
columns for whether we've dumped the contents, whether they've been reviewed and/or
transferred, what portions were transferred, etc.
Something roughly like the attached, with any other categories you think would be useful — and the
info on the attached is mostly hypothetical, obviously, just as examples. That will help us fully
understand what's been reviewed, transferred, and received so far, and what remains.
(Also just on the pictures, we do want copies of those as well, please including from the discs and
the devices — I think FBI was going to do an initial screen to make sure no CP, and since I think the
answer was no, we'll need to get those to be able to review them as well.)
many thanks,
From:
) <
>
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2020 09:24
To:
(USANYS)
;
(USANYS)
(USANYS) <
>
Cc:
(USANYS) [Contractor) <
:,;
(USANYS)
(USANYS)
S.;
Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents
Sorry for the delayed response. They are tearing out our old network and giving us a new one,
they mandated we delete old stuff (about 400 TB worth). Now that they are working on
replacing the network, we can do only local work. I should be able to give you an accounting
of what is what. I can say, off the top of my head, that all windows based items from the NY
search have been handed over as well as all loose media. The CDs from NY only contained
pictures, no documents. There are still some Apple items from NY that need to be produced.
As far as the Island stuff goes, the I st item on your spreadsheet, the "kitchen" mac has been
produced. Still working on the rest.
NY CART Coordinator
Senior Forensic Examiner
cell
desk
On Feb 23, 2020 12:21 AM,
(USANYS)"
3503-020
Page 5 of 7
SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17
EFTA_00001933
EFTA00157117
‹
> wrote:
Team,
Following up on the below from last weekend, I'm still not sure how we're addressing this so I
thought it would make sense for us to all schedule a (hopefully relatively brief) meeting to all get on
the same page? We didn't hear back on which files had previously been provided, but our tech folks
did their best to differentiate, and we got access to the materials yesterday and its well over a
million documents, and we don't have any idea what we're looking at — i.e., which devices the
materials came from, whether it's full or partial results, how many more devices we have coming,
etc.
Based on the attached search warrant returns, it looks like from the New York mansion (the POF)
there are approximately 40 devices that would have storage (computers, hard drives, thumb drives,
etc.) and that's not even counting at least 60+ CDs. And then from the Virgin Islands (the Excel
spreadsheet), at least more than 25 devices, including multiple servers / server racks.
So we gotta know what we've already received, what remains, anticipated schedule, etc, and I know
it's a lot of moving pieces on all sides so wanted to loop in everybody at once. The case team will be
in California this coming week from Tuesday through Friday, but then I think generally around the
first week of March, which will hopefully be plenty of time to schedule a productive meeting.
thanks all,
IMF
From:
(USANYS)
Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2020 16:30
To:
Cc:
(USANYS) [Contractor] <
>;
(USANYS) c
>;
(USANYS)
Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents
=,S
I'm not sure who's the exact right person to ask this, so wanted to get everybody on one email chain
about it — I have the hard drive that
dropped off that has new Epstein search warrant
materials, but it looks like there are also old materials (that I think we had previously received and
uploaded??) on the hard drive, and so I'm not sure what's new.
Just generally, and
and I talked about this last week too, but it's basically impossible for us to
keep track of what we're getting, and what has been completed, without some kind of identification
or labeling system, along with a list of which devices have been extracted and downloaded.
3503-020
Page 6 of 7
SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17
EFTA_00001934
EFTA00157118
So for example on the hard drive currently, there are 38 folders labeled "loadFiles" through
"37loadFiles" with a modified date of 11/14/19, which I think we may have already previously
received — but I'm not sure, because we haven't gotten any info on which folders match up to which
devices, etc. And then there's another folder titled "NYC024362" that has a modified date of
1/27/20, so I think that may be the materials we hadn't previously received? That folder by itself has
more than 600,0O0 items.
I don't want to give= anything that we've already previously received and uploaded, and I can't
tell from the folder or file names whether everything on the drive is new, or whether just additional
materials were saved onto it in addition to what we already have. =,
are you able to give us
some guidance on this? Ultimately what we really need is a spreadsheet of every device, whether
it's been dumped (or partially dumped), and then identifying that same info — which device, and
what materials from it — are being given to us with each data transfer. Otherwise I think
organizationally and for review purposes it will be a total disaster for us.
We're happy to have a meeting on this if that's helpful — and thanks everybody for the assistance.
Assistant V.S. Attorney
Southern District of New York
3503-020
Page 7 of 7
SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17
EFTA_00001935
EFTA00157119
Document Preview
PDF source document
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.
Extracted Information
Document Details
| Filename | EFTA00157113.pdf |
| File Size | 370.8 KB |
| OCR Confidence | 85.0% |
| Has Readable Text | Yes |
| Text Length | 12,611 characters |
| Indexed | 2026-02-11T10:59:21.737966 |