Back to Results

DOJ-OGR-00007853.jpg

Source: IMAGES  •  Size: 1130.2 KB  •  OCR Confidence: 92.6%
View Original Image

Extracted Text (OCR)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 499-1 Filed 11/23/21 Page 360 of 375 LaPorte CV (Version 2020.3) Page 7 of 19 5. Wagstaff, I. and LaPorte, G. The Importance of Diversity and Inclusion in the Forensic Sciences. NIJ Journal No. 279, September 2017: https://www.nij.gov/journals/279/Pages/importance-of-diversity-and-inclusion-in- forensic-sciences.aspXx. 6. LaPorte, G. Wrongful Convictions and DNA Exonerations: Understanding the Role of Forensic Science. NIJ Journal No. 279, September 2017: https://nij.gov/journals/279/Pages/wrongful-convictions-and-dna-exonerations.aspx. 7. Waltke, H., LaPorte, G., Weiss, D., Schwarting, D., Nguyen, M. and Scott, F. Sexual Assault Cases: Exploring the Importance of Non-DNA Forensic Evidence. NIJ Journal No. 279, September 2017: https://nij.gov/journals/279/Pages/non-dna-evidence-in- sexual-assault-cases.aspx. 8. Dutton, G. LaPorte G., Wagstaff, I. and Spivak, Cultivating the Next Generation of Forensic Scientists Through Science, Technology. Engineering and Mathematics (STEM). Journal of Forensic Research 2017,8:4; DOI: 10.4172/2157-7145.10000384. https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/cultivating-the-next-generation-of-forensic- scientists-through-sciencetechnology-engineering-and-mathematics-stem-2157-7145- 1000384. pdf 9. Gresham, K., LaPorte, G.., Montgomery, B. and Weiss, D. Using Innovative Technology to Investigate Targeted Mass Violence: What the Future Holds (May 2017) http://www.policechiefmagazine.org/using-innovative- technology/#sthash.bPcOad34.dpuf. 10. Jones, N., & LaPorte, G. (Eds.) (2017). 2017 National Institute of Justice Forensic Science Research and Development Symposium. (RTI Press Publication No. CP-0004- 1705). Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI Press. DOI: 10.3768/rtipress.2017.cp.0004. 1705. 11. LaPorte, GM. (2015) Chemical analysis for the scientific examination of questioned documents, in Forensic Chemistry: Fundamentals and Applications (ed J. A. Siegel), John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK. doi: 10.1002/9781118897768.ch8. 12. Technical Working Group on Biological Evidence. Biological Evidence Preservation: Considerations for Policy Makers (April 2015) (http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/ir/2015/NIST.IR.8048. pdf). 13. Technical Working Group on Biological Evidence Preservation. The Biological Evidence Preservation Handbook: Best Practice for Evidence Handlers. April 2013 (http://www.crime-scene-investigator.net/BiologicalEvidencePreservationHandbook.pdf) 14. Expert Working Group on Human Factors in Latent Print Analysis. Latent Print Examination and Human Factors: Improving the Practice through a Systems Approach. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology. February, 2012 (http://nij.gov/pubs-sum/latent-print-human-factors.htm). 15. Houlgrave, S., LaPorte, G., & Stephens, J. The Classification of Inkjet Inks Using AccuTOF™ DART™ (Direct Analysis in Real Time) Mass Spectrometry - A Preliminary Study. Accepted for Publication in the Journal of forensic Science on February 25, 2012. 16. LaPorte, G. & Stephens, J. Analysis Techniques Used for the Forensic Examination of Writing and Printing Inks in The Forensic Chemistry Handbook, John Wiley & Sons, A012 DOJ-OGR-00007853

Document Preview

DOJ-OGR-00007853.jpg

Click to view full size

Document Details

Filename DOJ-OGR-00007853.jpg
File Size 1130.2 KB
OCR Confidence 92.6%
Has Readable Text Yes
Text Length 3,232 characters
Indexed 2026-02-03 17:28:05.777870