EFTA00180159.pdf

.(USAFLS) From: Sent: To: (FBI); . (USAFLS) (FBI) When you have a chance, can you give me the flight info for 8/6/04? Where did it leave from and who was on board. Thanks. Assistant U.S. Attorne 795 EFTA00180159 (USAFLS) From: Sent: To: Subject: ravel Dates (USAFLS) 00 11' (FBI); (FBI) Hi guys — I am going to re-add the following travel counts: 8/6/04 8/19/04 10/29/04 2/21/05 3/31/05 Does that sound alright? A U Att 796 EFTA00180160 (USAFLS) From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: (USAFLS) 27, 0 10:14 AM AFLS) (USAFLS) St avert heard anything How did things go with NM Assistant U.S. Attorne Tracking: 797 EFTA00180161 Recipient ana-/SAILS) IIIMMURAFIS) 798 Read Read: 6/27/2008 10:28 AM Read: 612712008 10:37 AM EFTA00180162 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: e , 8 12:26 PM To: USAFLS) Subject: : e rey pstein I think that is something we should take up with the State Attorney's Office once this is a done deal. Another way we may be able to do this is through the local police detective who investigated the case. He may be given an opportunity to speak if he asks for it. I will find out about that. Assistant U.S. Attorney S ir Original Message From: (USAFLS) Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 11:48 AM To: galliMilalt (USAFLS) Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein Gr8. BTW what about a factual proffer? Original Message From: (USAFLS) To: Ro BLACK <RBLACK@royblack.com>; Jack Goldberger <jgoldberger@agwpa.com> Cc: (USAFLS) Sent: Thu Jun 26 11:16:04 2008 Subject: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Roy and Jack: I have been reviewing the deferred prosecution agreement and wanted to remind you that the agreement states: "Epstein shall provide to the U.S. Attorney's Office copies of all proposed agreements with the State Attorney's Office prior to entering into those agreements." Please provide me with any proposed agreements at your earliest opportunity, and also please provide me with the date and time of the change of plea. Thank you. Assistant U.S. Attorne 805 EFTA00180163 908 :6uppeis EFTA00180164 Recipient Read MEI (USAFLS) Read: 6/26/2008 1:09 PM 807 EFTA00180165 (USAFLS) From: Sent: To: Subject: U2onipd USAFLS) 811:02 AM (USAFLS) ere it is 813 EFTA00180166 .(USAFLS) From: . (USAFLS) Sent: ne 26, 2008 10:49 AM To: SAFLS) Subject: upg Ding: Victim Notification with edit.wpd Attachments: IM Victim Notification with edit.wpd Hi -- I made one small change in the acknowledgment paragraph, so that it says the letter accurately sets forth the agreement with the Office regarding the identification and notification of victims. I don't want him to think that all of the other terms and conditions went "poof." Also, during my obsession last night I thought, if Ken S. really wants to "bury the hatchet" he can start by sending a letter to OPR making clear that no member of the U.S. Attorney's Office committed any misconduct in connection with the investigation and prosecution of 7E. If he wants to add, "and I admit that I am a liar, liar, pants on fire," that would be gravy. The message is ready to be sent with the following file or link attachments: Victim Notification with edit.wpd Note: To protect against computer viruses, I -mail programs may prevent sending or receiving certain types of file attachments. Check your I -mail security settings to determine how attachments are handled. 817 EFTA00180167 (USAFLS) From: .(USAFLS) Sent: , 008 10:37 AM To: (FBI) Subject: R : J Hi -- They were on my chair when I got back. Thank youl Assistant U.S. Attorney 1111 Pri Original Messa e From: . (FBI) Sent: Thursda , June 26, 2008 10:34 AM To: . (USAFLS) Subject: Re: JE Did you get the fax of info? I sent the phone reports in a second fax because they did not scan cleanly with the first fax. Original Message From: (USAFLS) < To: Sent: Wed Jun 25 16:08:23 2008 Subject: JE Hi guys - Can you send me the stuff on (including lists of phone calls) so I can add her to the indictment? Thank you. Assistant U.S. Attorney 820 EFTA00180168 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: e , 8 8:31 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: : evise Victim Notification al-- I am running off to grand jury. I will call as soon as I get back, probably around 9:45. Thanks. Assistant U.S. Attorne Ori:SalMessage From: 'MIMI (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesda ,airs2s 2008 6:05 PM Cc: (USAFLS) Subject: Fw: Revised Victim Notification This simplifies it. What do u think? Original Message From: Acosta li (USAFLS) To: (USAFLS) Sent: Wed Jun 25 18:00:14 2008 Subject: RE: Revised Victim Notification What do you think «U.wpd» From: (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesiiii June 25, 2008 5:43 PM To: Acosta, (USAFLS) Subject: FW: Revised Victim Notification From: -_Ill (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesiiii June 25, 2008 5:25 PM To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: Revised Victim Notification 821 EFTA00180169 Hi - I have tried to phrase it in a way that suggests that, since Epstein has performed certain provisions, it is now our turn to perform. « File: Revised Victim Notification.wpd » Assistant U.S. Attorne Tracking: 822 EFTA00180170 Recipient alltISAELS) 823 Road Read: 6/28/2008 9:42 AM EFTA00180171 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: MOINE2008 6:05 PM Cc: . (USAFLS) Subject: Fw: Revised Victim Notification Attachments: U.wpd This simplifies it. What do u think? Original Message From: Acosta (USAFLS) To: (USAFLS) Sent: Wed Jun 25 18:00:14 2008 Subject: RE: Revised Victim Notification What do you think «U.wpd» From: (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 5:43 PM To: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS) Subject: FW: Revised Victim Notification From: ill li (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesiiii June 25, 2008 5:25 PM To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: Revised Victim Notification Hi - I have tried to phrase it in a way that suggests that, since Epstein has performed certain provisions, it is now our turn to perform. « File: Revised Victim Notification.wpd » Assistant U.S. Attorne III 824 EFTA00180172 (USAFLS) From: . (USAFLS) Sent: June 25, 2 To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: Revised Victim Notification Hilt— I have tried to phrase it in a way that suggests that, since Epstein has performed certain provisions, it is now our turn to perform. Revised Victim Notification.wp... Assistant U.S Tracking: 825 EFTA00180173 Recipient Read (USAFLS) Road: 6/25/2008 5:32 PM (USAFLS) Read. 6/26/2008 6:26 PM (USAFLS) Read: 6125/2008 5:29 PM 826 EFTA00180174 (USAFLS) From: (CRM) Sent: MISINI2008 4:27 PM To: . (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Immunity Letter Attachments: signed VVIJUN220(11.pdf Ms. I apologize, here they are. From: (USAFLS) Sent: June 25, 2008 4:23 PM To: Subject: RE: Immunity Letter Hi — Thank you for your I -mail, but the attachment did not come through. Can you resend? A. Villafafia Assistant U.S. Attorne From: (CRM) Sent: 25, 2008 4:18 PM To: Cc: (CRM); (CRM) Subject: Immunity Letter Ms. immunity authorization letter is attached to this email; if further assistance is needed on this matter call Legal Assistant Policy and Statutory Enforcement Unit - OEO 827 EFTA00180175 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: iiiiiiiiiir 25, 2I2agjaad...,. To: (FBI); MIN=MIN. (FBI) Subject: JE . Hi guys - Can you send me the stuff on I (including lists of phone calls) so I can add her to the indictment? Thank you. ssis nt U.S. Attorne 828 EFTA00180176 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: usisne 25, 2008,1hair; To: USAFLS); USAFLS): eillaUSAFLS) Subject: Proposed Victim Notification Can you take a look and provide feedback? I know that Alex added "No more, no less" in his letter, but it isn't really "legalese," so I would prefer to omit unless the defense insists. Also, please let me know if you want me to send over to Roy and Jack now or wait until the deal is done. Victim Notification.wpd A. OIVIllafalia Assists Tracking: 829 EFTA00180177 Recipient Read (USAFLS) Read: 612512008 4:02 PM MINIE (USAFLS) Read: 6/2512008 4:04 PM (USAFLS) Read: 6/25/2008 4:07 PM 830 EFTA00180178 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: une . 008 3:08 PM To: USAFLS) Subject: : ues ions Hi Bil— Sorry. I have an indictment going tomorrow so I haven't had a chance to work on the notice yet, but, yes, I planned to use the 12/19 language. I am going to start working on that right now. As to filing the indictment under seal with the state court, I really think this is walking too close to a 61 violation, and since the state judges up hem don't like us too-much, Judge McSorley would probably order it unsealed which would cause huge problems, both in terms of Rule 61 and because the public reaction will be — if the US had the evidence to prosecute all of these counts, which is he skating with 18 months? I haven't heard anything from Roy or anyone else. Let me think about ways other than contacting the State Attorney's Office to accomplish our goals. tant 11.5. Att rne From: (USAFLS) Sen sd ne 25, 2008 2:53 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: Questions 1. Can we file the proposed indictment under seal with the State Court judge? The agreement states that the parties anticipate that this agreement will not be made part of any public record. 2. Was your suggestion to prepare a notice to victims incorporating the language of the 12/19 letter? Tracking: 831 EFTA00180179 Recipient (USAFLS) NMI. (USAFLS) 832 Read Read: 8/25/2008 3:10 PM Read: 8125/2008 3:09 PM EFTA00180180 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: 11001662008 2:53 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: Questions 1. Can we file the proposed indictment under seal with the State Court judge? The agreement states that the parties anticipate that this agreement will not be made part of any public record. 2. Was your suggestion to prepare a notice to victims incorporating the language of the 12/19 letter? 833 EFTA00180181 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent Fr.= :2QQAjkam. To: (USAFLS);MMEIM(USAFLS); Subject ange a Procedure (USAFLS) Hi all — I just spoke with II= She said that it varies from judge to judge, and Judge McSorley can vary from day to day, but since Epstein is pleading guilty (as opposed to no contest), there should be a written plea agreement and a full plea colloquy that goes through all of the terms of the plea agreement and a factual proffer that the defendant has to agree to. She said that, after the rest of the colloquy is finished, the judge asks the prosecutor to state the factual basis, and the prosecutor then reads the factual proffer into the record. After it is read, the judge asks the defendant is he did the things recited in the proffer and/or if he agrees that the State could prove those facts. She said that the length and detail of the factual proffer varies from prosecutor to prosecutor and thought that Lanna was less detailed than most. I will try to send you a proposed factual proffer later this afternoon. *stant U.S. Att me Tracking: 834 EFTA00180182 Recipient Read MilligUSAFLS) Read: &25i2008 11:23 AM IIIMIDUSAFLS) Read: 8/251200812:13 PM alIMMUSAFIS) Read: 8/25/2008 10:57 AM 835 EFTA00180183 (USAFLS) From: Sent: To: Subject: (USAFLS) June 25, 2008 8:40 AM (USAFLS) RE: Jeffrey Epstein Agreement Hi -- I think I have designed a solution to the 2255 issue and I will call you to discuss the plea. I am still finishing up these search warrants. As soon as they are done, I will give you a call. Assistant U.S. Attorney Original Message From: (USAFLS) Sent: Tuesda , June 24, 2008 9:14 PM To: . (USAFLS) Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein Agreement Let's talk about going to the COP Ori inal Messa e From: . (USAFLS) To: Roy BLACK <RBLACK@royblack.com>; Jack Goldberger <jgoldberger@agwpa.com> Cc: (USAFLS) Sent: Tue Jun 24 16:04:55 2008 Subject: Jeffrey Epstein Agreement Dear Roy and Jack: I am just writing to re-state that it is the Government's position that we have a signed, binding agreement and that there is no need for further modification. Please keep us informed of the date and time of the change of plea and sentencing. Thank you. Assistant U.S. Attorne 836 EFTA00180184 Ift3 :Buiveil EFTA00180185 Recipient Road (USAFLS) Read: 6/25/2008 8:46 AM 838 EFTA00180186 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: 8 9:14 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: e: e myEpsteinAgreement Let's talk about going to the COP Original Message From: . (USAFLS) To: Roy BLACK <RBLACK@royblack.com>; Jack Goldberger <jgoldberger@agwpa.com> Cc: IIMMEMIll (USAFLS) Sent: Tue Jun 24 16:04:55 2008 Subject: Jeffrey Epstein Agreement Dear Roy and Jack: I am just writing to re-state that it is the Government's position that we have a signed, binding agreement and that there is no need for further modification. Please keep us informed of the date and time of the change of plea and sentencing. Thank you. Assistant U.S. Attorne 839 EFTA00180187 Recipient Road Roy BLACK' 'Jack Goldberger (USAFLS) Read: 6(24/2008 4:38 PM NES (USAFLS) Read: 612412008 4:05 PM (USAFLS) Read: 6(2412008 4:16 PM 841 EFTA00180188 (USAFLS) From: . (USAFLS) Sent: 4.2008 To: . (FBI); . (FBI) Subject: Keep an eye on Epstein's planesIll Will call in a few minutes Assistant U.S. Attorne 842 EFTA00180189 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: e To: US USAFLS) Subject: ase ca asap Assistant U.S. Attorne Tracking: 643 EFTA00180190 Recipient Read INIMMIUSAFLS) Read: 6/24/2098 3:53 PM IMMIII(USAFLS) Read: 6124/2008 3:52 PM 844 EFTA00180191 (USAFLS) From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: USAFLS) 5:30 PM (USAFLS) I agree. can you make this communication today please. Thank you. Orj.ginalMessage From: Sill (USAFLS) Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 6:45 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: Epstein a If we get the go-ahead, I think should immediately notify Lefkowitz that JE has until COB Monday June 30 to comply with the 9/24 Agreement as modified by the USA's 12/17 letter otherwise the Office will deem him in breach. What say you? 859 EFTA00180192 (USAFLS) From: Sent: To: Subject: scan0001.pdf SAFLS) 5:28 PM (USAFLS) 860 EFTA00180193 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: /C r . 2:44 PM To: USAFLS); allalliUSAFLS); Acosta, Alex (USAFLS) Subject: ny wor rom DC? Ili all — Sorry to bother. I are wondering if you have heard from the DAG. I- Assistant U.S. Attorney Tracking: 861 EFTA00180194 Recipient Read MINIOUSAFLS) Read: 6/23/2008 2:57 PM allanUSAFLS) Read: 6/23/2008 3:18 PM Acosta, Alex (OWLS) 862 EFTA00180195 (USAFLS) From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: USAFLS) 10:08 AM (USAFLS): LS) ork, etc. Ok. hoping to hear from DAG's office today giving the green light. From: (USAFLS) Sen June 23, 2008 9:15 AM To: (FBI); Cc: (USAFLS); Subject Trip to New York, etc. (FBI) USAFIS) (FBI): (FBI) Let's talk when that decision is made. We will not be interviewing Ellin New York. Her attorney gave a copy of the grand jury subpoena to Epstein's lawyers. They, in turn, promptly sent it on to Washington complaining, yet again, about me. So, I do not want to do an interview with him present, and we will have to put her in the grand jury. Given that, let's take the New York section out of the indictment so we can present the indictment Tuesday morning. Then we can do interview in the afternoon with plans to supersede. It probably makes sense to wait on the rest of the interviews until we hear what has to say, so let's plan to do the New York trip in a few weeks. I will revise everything accordingly and send it down to you. We have another girl from Florida, so I will replace our New York Jane Doe with her. ssista t U.S. Att rne 867 EFTA00180196 (USAFLS) From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: (USAFLS) 9 15AM (FBI SAF),L 1111111(FSABI) , U FLS) np o ew ' o etc. We will not be interviewing in New York. Her attorney gave a copy of the grand jury subpoena to Epstein's lawyers. They, in turn, promptly sent it on to Washington complaining, yet again, about me. So, I do not want to do an interview with him present, and we will have to put her in the grand jury. Given that, let's take the New York section out of the indictment so we can present the indictment Tuesday morning. Then we can do lallinterview in the afternoon with plans to supersede. It probably makes sense to wait on the rest of the interviews until we hear what has to say, so let's plan to do the New York trip in a few weeks. 1 will revise everything accordingly and send it down to you. We have another girl from Florida, so I will replace our New York Jane Doe with her. si U.S. At orne Tracking: 868 EFTA00180197 Recipient Read (FBI) (FBI) I(UW (USAFLS) 869 Read: 8/23/2008 9:32 AM Read: 6123/2008 9:40 AM EFTA00180198 (USAFLS) From: Sent: To: Subject: IMEMPIMIT3litle . e: rave o lew •0 AUSA on NY drug case is . From: To: Sent: Thu Jun 19 15:37:58 2008 Subject: Travel to New York Original Message (FBI) :04 PM (USAFLS) (USAFLS) Hi all - I just got an 'Email from Earn lawyer saying that, if we get the immunity, we can meet with her on Friday, June 27th, in New York. The application is up in DC now. It should be a sure thing, but you never know. Let's talk tomorrow about planning the trip. Assistant U.S. Attorney 870 EFTA00180199 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: To: ' AFLS)TISIN(USAFLS) Cc: USAFL Subject: I am just reading through all of the new submissions. I don't know which makes me atilesr, all of the blatant lies, or telling them (Lilly, no doubt), that I am "unsupervisable." • orry I got you into this. On another, ironic, note. Today, Epstein's lawyers are filing motions to stay the four federal lawsuits against Epstein, under 18 USC 3509(k), which states: "If, at any time that a cause of action for recovery of compensation for damage or injury to the person of a child exists, a criminal action is pending which arises out of the same occurrence and in which the chili is the victim, the civil action shall be stayed until the end of all phases of the criminal action and any mention of the civil action during the criminal proceeding is prohibited." I guess it saves me the trouble of filing the motion after we indict. And, for the record, I still haven't met Bert 0., and he is neither illaw partner" nor his "law school roommate." Assi tant U.S. Attorne Tracking: 871 EFTA00180200 Recipient Read IMMIBUSAFIS) Read: W20/2008 3:47 PM IMISUSAFLS) Read: 6/2012008 3:46 PM allailliUSAFIS) Read: 6231200810:58 AM SAFES) Read: 6/20/2008 3:46 PM 872 EFTA00180201 (USAFLS) From: USAFLS) Sent: 2008 :37 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: . ps am - n a f of Jay Lefkowitz and Ken Star Attachments: Letter to J. Roth from S. Thacker.pdf; Response to I Misconduct.pdf; Principal Submission.pdf fyi From: Roth, John (ODAG) (SMO) Sent 4. 1,Siale 20, 2008 1:56 PM To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: FW: Epstein - On behalf o Jay efkowitz and Ken Star etter.pdf; Summary Of This was just dropped on me. Given the volume of material, I think it will be best to wait until Monday to call Lefkowitz. Let me know if that upsets your plans too much. From: Ami Sheth [mailto:ASheth@ldrkland.com] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 12:26 PM To: Roth, John (ODAG) Cc: Jay Lefkowitz; Kenneth Starr; Ken Starr Subject: Epstein - On behalf of Jay Lefkowitz and Ken Star Dear Mr. Roth, As promised in yesterday's letter to you, we have attached the followin documents to this email: (1) Principal Submission, (2) Summary of Misconduct, (3) Response to Letter and (4) Response to CEOS's Letter by Stephanie Thacker. We respectfully request and would greatly appreciate the opportunity to speak with you in person about this matter. Kind Regards, Kenneth W. Starr and Jay P. Lefkowitz Kirkland & Ellis LLP The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Kirkland & Ellis LLP or Kirkland & Ellis International LLP. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return l-mail or by I-mail to postmasterOkirkland.com, and 873 EFTA00180202 destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. 879 EFTA00180203 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: F 8 :12 AM To: USAFLS) Cc: LS) Subject: FW: Epstein I am in shock. Could this really happen? Assistant U.S. Attorney Ori inal Message From: (USAFLS) Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 9:11 AM To: Roth, John (ODAG) (SMO); Cc: Soffer, Gil • (ODAG) (SMO) Subject: Re: Epstein Thanks John. Original Message From: Roth, John (ODAG) (SMO) To: (USAFLS); Cc: Soffer, Gil (ODAG) (SMO) Sent: Fri Jun 20 09:01:18 2008 Subject: FW: Epstein (USAFLS) (USAFLS) FYI. Gil and I have finished our review. Even if we were to substitute our judgment for yours, we believe that this case is one that is appropriately in federal court. We also see nothing in the conduct of the USAO that gives us any reason to doubt that the case is being handled professionally. We briefed the DAG on it yesterday and he agrees. The attached late submission throws a slight wrinkle into this, but I think we can still satisfy your timetable. I have asked Starr and Lefkowitz for an electronic version of whatever he is going to send, to be sent this morning. I am going to schedule a telephone conference for this afternoon or this evening to let them know, but I thought you should know so you can start planning. Please don't reach out to defense counsel until we let them know. From: Kenneth Starr [mailto: Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 9:11 PM 878 EFTA00180204 To: Roth, John (ODAG) Cc: Jay Lefkowitz; li Subject: Re: Epstein Dear Mr. Roth, As you have requested, we are sending our supplemental submissions and binder of materials to the Department for delivery tomorrow. Attached here is our introductory letter. I will be traveling abroad next week and kindly ask that you contact my colleague in this matter, Jay Lefkowitz, by email or by telephone at Kind regards. Kenneth W. Starr Kirkland & Ellis LLP NM "Roth, John (ODAG)" <John.Roth3Ousdoj.gov> 06/11/2008 07:08 AM To <IIIIIIIINSIII CC Subject Epstein , <Ken.StarrOpepperdine.edu> Sorry for the phone tag. We have all of your letters to both SDFL and the Criminal Division, but feel free to supplement that if you wish. It is best simply to send it by 'Email to me, with a copy to your contact in the USAO. If 879 EFTA00180205 you do decide to send us something, it would be most useful to get it by the middle of next week. Thanks. John Roth Associate Deputy Attorney General ***********************************************###********* The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Kirkland & Ellis LLP or Kirkland & Ellis International LLP. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return l[mail or by ♦mail to postmasterQkirkland.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. *******###******************************************44***** Tracking: 880 EFTA00180206 Recipient Read (USAFLS) (USAFLS) 881 Read: 6/23/2008 10:59 AM EFTA00180207 (USAFLS) From: piiiUSAFLS) Sent: n ay, une 0, 2008 9:11 To: Roth, Johnf DAG) (SMO); USAFLS) Cc: Soffer, Gil (ODAG) (SMO Subject: Re: Epstein Thanks John. Original Message From: Roth, John (ODAG) (SMO) To: (USAFLS); Cc: Soffer, Gil (ODAG) (SMO) Sent: Fri Jun 20 09:01:18 2008 Subject: FW: Epstein (USAFLS) FYI. Gil and I have finished our review. Even if we were to substitute our judgment for yours, we believe that this case is one that is appropriately in federal court. We also see nothing in the conduct of the USA° that gives us any reason to doubt that the case is being handled professionally. We briefed the DAG on it yesterday and he agrees. The attached late submission throws a slight wrinkle into this, but I think we can still satisfy your timetable. I have asked Starr and Lefkowitz for an electronic version of whatever he is going to send, to be sent this morning. I am going to schedule a telephone conference for this afternoon or this evening to let them know, but I thought you should know so you can start planning. Please don't reach out to defense counsel until we let them know. From: Kenneth Starr [mailto: Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 9:11 PM To: Roth, John (ODAG) Cc: Jay Lefkowitz; Subject: Re: Epstein Dear Mr. Roth, As you have requested, we are sending our supplemental submissions and binder of materials to the Department for delivery tomorrow. Attached here is our introductory letter. I will be traveling abroad next week and kindly ask that you contact my colleague in this matter, Jay Lefkowitz, by email or by telephone at Kind regards. 882 EFTA00180208 Kenneth W. Starr Kirkland & Ellis LLP "Roth, John (ODAG)" <John.Roth3Ousdoi.gov> 06/11/2008 07:08 AM To MIIIIIINIMIL, < CC Subject Epstein Sorry for the phone tag. We have all of your letters to both SDFL and the Criminal Division, but feel free to supplement that if you wish. It is best simply to send it by 'Email to me, with a copy to your contact in the USAO. If you do decide to send us something, it would be most useful to get it by the middle of next week. Thanks. John Roth Associate De uty Attorney General ******************************************************###** The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Kirkland & Ellis LLP or Kirkland & Ellis International LLP. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this 883 EFTA00180209 communication in error, please notify us immediately by return limail or by oilman to postmasterPkirkland.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. #*##*****************************************************4* 884 EFTA00180210 Recipient 11... (LEO) INNIMINUSAFLS) jimmilUSAFLS) 886 Read Read: 6/19/2008 4:48 PM Read: 6/19/2008 4:47 PM EFTA00180211 (USAFLS) From: Sent: To: (FBI); (FBI) Subject: ravel to ew ork Hi all — I just got an 'mail from )'lawyer saying that, if we get the immunity, we can meet with her on Friday, June 27'h, in New York. The application is up in DC now. It should be a sure thing, but you never know. Let's talk tomorrow about planning the trip. i U. . to 887 EFTA00180212 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: ne 1 , 008 2.51 PM To: (USAWAW) Subject: RE: Vanity Fair Was that not the harshest article ever? Ironically, in their latest appeal — to the DAG, yes, that is right, the DAG! — they claim that I ant persecuting him because of his close ties to the Clintons. Assistant U.S. Attorne From: (USAWAW) sentimadiu,s12,2008 2:38 PM To: a (USAFLS) Subject: Vanity Fair Saw your man/case mentioned in the Bill Clinton article. Tracking: 896 EFTA00180213 Recipient Road FaUSAWAVV) Read: 6/1972008 3:26 PM 897 EFTA00180214 . (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: 19, 2008 2:02 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: -mail to Bany Hi - I talked with about communicating the substance of our conversation with Roy Black to Barry to avoid the miscommunication that the defense loves to do. What do you think of this? Dear Barry: I just wanted to let you know that and I spoke with Roy Black yesterday regarding the Epstein case. Roy asked whether there was a way to resolve the federal and state litigation simultaneously and mentioned your desire to wrap up the case before you retired. We informed him that the Office's position is that if Epstein promptly abides by the terms of the signed non-prosecution agreement, we will end our investigation. If Mr. Epstein chooses to go forward with a different plea in the State, that is his prerogative, but we will consider it a breach of the non-prosecution agreement and will proceed accordingly. The terms of the agreement call for Mr. Epstein to plead guilty to the state indictment and also to a state charge that requires sex offender registration, specifically the charge of procuring minors to engage in prostitution, at least 18 months imprisonment, and an agreement that the victims can pursue damages claims as though Mr. Epstein had been convicted of the federal offenses. Our agreement does not address probationary periods following the term of incarceration. Those arc statutorily set on the federal side, so we have left that issue to the defense to negotiate with you. If you have any questions, please let me know. Tracking: 898 EFTA00180215 668 rid gvz soontwg :peed plum (914Va l tuatdpos EFTA00180216 . (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: ASS, 2008 1:42 PM To: . (FBI) Subject: RE: Epstein — Call with Roy Black Hi -- I sent an to about the Clark case asking for the info regarding the cp so I can prepare the indictment. Our office has approved the immunity request so it is now up with Washington. Don't know how long they will take to review it. I also am still waiting to hear from lawyer about whether he will agree to meet or if we have to wait for the grand jury. • Assistant U.S. Attorne III Ori inal From: (FBI) Sent: Thursda Jun2.21.2008 1:37 PM To: IIIIIIIIIIII (USAFLS) Subject: Re: Epstein -- Call with Roy Black Sounds fishy to us. Not sure what the benefit could be. Anything from your office on the immunity letter and NY trip. On another note, how do you want to handle' other case (Jonathan Clark). Is grand jury next Thursday? She is meeting with tomorrow 43 images of CP transmitted. Ori inal Messa e From: II (USAFLS < To: (USAFLS); Acosta USAFLS); (USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Sent: Wed Jun 18 13:53:07 2008 Subject: Epstein -- Call with Roy Black and I spoke with Roy. Roy said that he had called because he had heard that had discussed the matter with Barry Krischer and Roy wanted to see if there was any wail", iiiiiihis up before July 7th. Roy also said that he had seen a letter from that said that the matter of incarceration would be left to the State. (I am not certain what letter he is referring to, but I think wrote a letter about not taking a position on where Epstein would be incarcerated, not the length of time.) So, Roy wondered whether we would go away if Epstein took Barry's 60-day deal. 903 EFTA00180217 explained that had not had substantive discussions with Barry about the case and that all communication regarding the case is being handled by and me. In response to the question of whether there was anything that could "make this go away," we said that our position is that if Epstein stops the process in Washington and pleads in accordance with the terms of the signed agreement, then we will perform pursuant to the agreement. explained that if Epstein pleads to something else or gets sentenced to a lower amount, then we will consider that a breach of our agreement and we will proceed accordingly. On that note, has there been any word from Washington? Thank you. Assistant U.S. Attorney 909 EFTA00180218 (USAFLS) From: (USAFIS) Sent: 19, 2008 1;22,JA To: (USAFLS); MEIN (USAFLS) Subject: Hi ■ and W— Two things: Do you think and I should call Barry Krischer and tell him about our conversation with Roy and the Office's position? One of our best witnesses has hired an attorney. He is a former state prosecutor and seems like a good guy. He asked me for a status and I told him that all I could say is that it remains my hope that we will charge JE. He would like to advocate on behalf of his client that we move forward. Would the DAG consider hearing from the victims? Tracking: 905 EFTA00180219 Recipient • Read Read: 6/1912008 1:31 PM IIIMIEUSAFLS) Read: 6119120081:38 PM 906 EFTA00180220 (USAFLS) From: .(USAFLS) Sent: ne 18, 20081:53 P To: SAFLS); A FLS); Cc: (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: pstein — Cal wkh Roy Black (USAFLS) and I spoke with Roy. Roy said that he had called because he had heard that had discussed the matter with Barry 1Crischer and Roy wijac if there was any way to wrap this up before July 7th. Roy also said that he had seen a letter from MI that said that Sag matter of incarceration would be left to the State. (1 am not certain what letter he is referring to, but I think El wrote a letter about not taking a position on where Epstein would be incarcerated, not the length of time.) So, Roy wondered whether we would go away if Epstein took Barry's 60-day deal. explained that had not had substantive lesions with Barry about the case and that all communication regarding the case is being handled by and me. In response to the question of whether there was anything that could "make this go away," we said that our position is that if Epstein stops the process in Washington a s in accordance with the terms of the signed agreement, then we will perform pursuant to the agreementli explained that if Epstein pleads to something else or gets sentenced to a lower amount, then we will consider that a breach of our agreement and we will proceed accordingly. On that note, has there been any word from Washington? Thank you. Tracking: 930 EFTA00180221 Recipient Read (USAFLS) Read: 611812008 2:19 PM Acosta. Alex (USAFLS) (USAFLS) Read: 6/18/2008 2:06 PM (USAFLS) Read: 6118(2008 5:48 PM (USAFLS) Read: 6(18120081:59 PM . (FBI) . (FBI) (USAFLS) Read: 6/18/2008 3:17 PM 931 EFTA00180222 (USAFLS) From: . (USAFLS) Sent (USAFLS) 8 , AT? 20081:10 PM To: Subject: Roy Black Called Will you be back soon or do you want to do a conference call? 11-1111I1 ' nt .' At 932 EFTA00180223 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent MS June 18, 2ggitaarjA, To: (USAFLS);MIIMM (USAFLS) Subject: Epstein Hi guys — and t put in a call to Roy Black this morning. He was "unavailable," so we left a message. has approved an immunity request for one of the New York victims/recruiters. NM is out so we are going to send it down to you, but I wondered who it should go to first, one of you or Ken? Thanks. Tracking: 933 EFTA00180224 Recipient Road (USAFLS) Read: 8/181'20081:07 PM (USAFLS) Read: 6/1812008 12:08 PM 934 EFTA00180225 (USAFLS) From: . (USAFLS) Sent: e 17, 2008 4:02 PM To: aill (USAFLS) Subject: Roy and JE Hi.— Well, Roy took your message an that he should call out of the office, so there hasn't been any communication. I= and I may call Roy later today or is going to call him back and tell him to call me. an A Tracking: 941 EFTA00180226 Redalont Read (USAFLS) Road: 6/17/2008 4:15 PM 942 EFTA00180227 (USAFLS) From: Sent: 3:00 PM To: illelli(USAFLS) Subject: Re: Unfortunately, the only info we have for allilis her address. Source info indicates she's from Brazil. There are numerous name matches in ice records. We need to review the a files of the ones that match closest to determine her dob and soc. Any way we could get those particulars through her attorney?(Needed for travel arrangements?) Ori inal Messa e From: USAFLS To: Sent: Tue Jun 17 14:45:31 2008 Subject: MIN Hi guys - sorry to bother you, but I need this info about i asap so I can get the paperwork down to Miami. Thanks. Birth Date of Witness: FBI I.D. No.: Birthplace: Social Security No.: Alias: Address of Witness: Also, do you have the name and number of the AUSA in New York? I want to run this by him/her first. Thanks. Assistant U.S. Attorney Phone 944 EFTA00180228 Stt xej EFTA00180229 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: aploW0 F0B8 a 0.2 (FBI) To: Subject: I-li guys — sorry to bother you, but I need this info about asap so I can get the paperwork down to Miami. Thanks. Birth Date of Witness: FBI ID. No.: Birthplace: Social Security No.: Alias: Address of Witness: Also, do you have the name and number of the AUSA in New York? I want to run this by him/her first. Thanks. istar 946 EFTA00180230 (USAFLS) From: .(USAFLS) To: 17, 2008 • AFLS); LS); (USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Sent: Tuesda Subject: Epstein Hi all — and I just spoke with Barry Krischer. He began with his usual complaint about us not communicating with him. I explained that it was the defense who were blocking the channels of communication. He then told us that the current deal he has worked out with Jack Goldberger is 60 days in the County Jail, 2 years community confinement, and 3 years probation. He says that Epstein has agreed to plead to "attempted lewd conduct," which, Barry says, will require registration. We asked Barry to send us the proposed Information so I can look to see whether, in fact, registration will be required. It also sounds like it will not involve a child sex offense. I told Barry that the defense had told us that Barry objected to Epstein's plea to the procurement charge and to his having to register as a sex offender. Barry said that the testimony in the grand jury would support the procurement charge and that they have never discussed sex offender registration. Apparently Jack Goldberger told Barry that the delay was caused by DOJ's internal investigation into my conduct referring business to my boyfriend's "law partner." We explained that the delay is caused by the defense appealing our decisions throughout the Justice Department. He also said that Jack Goldberger had shown him a letter from MI Acosta about having to plead in two weeks. He asked and Ito get back to him after we review the Information to tell him if it is okay to go ahead with the plea deal. Strangely enough, I haven't heard from Roy Black. I will let you know when we receive the Information. Tracking: 947 EFTA00180231 Recipient Read Acosta. Alex (USAFLS) (USAFLS) Read: 6/17/2008 11:54 AM (USAFLS) Read: 6/17/2008 11:09 AM (USAFLS) Read: 6/17/200811:29 AM (USAFLS) Read: 6/17/2008 1:50 PM (FBI) (FBI) (USAFLS) Read: 6/17200811:11 AM 948 EFTA00180232 (USAFLS) From: (FBI) Sent: 8 10:45 AM To: Subject: Re: Call Urgent! Hi I have support for the New York trip (funding may be an issue though). I have the request prepared but need to add dates of travel when we get them. Talk to you later. From: Original Messa I. (USAFLS) < To: USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS) Sent: Fri Jun 13 15:06:07 2008 Subject: FW: Call -- Urgentl -- Someone really needs to talk to Barry. I am happy to do so, if you want, and I will be very nice about it. Original Message From: (USAFLS) Sent: Frida June 21.2p08 3:03 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Call He got a strange voice mail from Barry K which the deal was 60 days--he was calling him back to say that is not the deal and the defense knows the deal as does his ASA. So they should do what they want and if it is not in accordance with our agreement we will do whatever we have to do. Original Message From: I. (USAFLS) Sent: Frida June 13, 2008 2:52 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Call Can you give the heads up so he doesn't do something unexpected? Ori inal Message From: (USAFLS) Sent: Frida June 2.16.22gp 2:23 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Call Are you coming back home? 949 EFTA00180233 Original Messa e From: . (USAFLS) Sent: Frida June 13, 2008 11:56 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: Call Hi . We had a good call with the dag's chief of staff. The leem ready to greenlight us. Strangely, just an hour later roy black called= to propose a "final solution" (his words not mine). told him to call me. (Imagine that). So are you free later for a conf call if he actually calls? 950 EFTA00180234 (USAFLS) From: USAFLS) Sent: 8 6:15 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: pstem Sorry, forgot to cc you. From: USAFLS) Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 6:09 PM To: R th John ODAG) (SMO) Cc: (USAFLS) Subject: Epstein John, Epstein is facing trial on a felony charge of solicitation of prostitution. This does not resemble the charges that Epstein agreed to plead guilty to in the September 24th Agreement nor what he would face federally. That case is set for trial on Monday July 7. If we are given the go ahead from the DAG's office, we would give Epstein one final chance to comply with the September 24th Agreement. In that regard, it would be most preferable to have a decision by next week. That would give us the opportunity to seek an indictment on Tuesday July 1“ if Epstein fails to comply with the September 24th Agreement by Monday June 30th The reason this timetable is important is to address our concern that Epstein may continue to keep us in a holding pattern if he pleads to the pending state solicitation of prostitution charge before a federal indictment is returned. In that scenario, I anticipate Epstein's counsel raising petit policy issues, thus throwing another possible monkey wrench in the process. Although I don't believe that the petit policy would be affected, I can imagine someone calling a timeout until the issue is vetted. That's why I would prefer being able to seek an indictment before Epstein pleads to the pending charge and after he has repudiated the September 24th Agreement. Thanks, a 951 EFTA00180235 (USAFLS) From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Importance: High (USAFLS) :06 PM AFLS) USAFLS) a I mem! MI-- Someone really needs to talk to Barry. I am happy to do so, if you want, and I will be very nice about it. Original Message From: (USAFLS) Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 3:03 PM To: 'MIMS= (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Call He got a strange voice mail from Barry K which the deal was 60 days--he was calling him back to say that is not the deal and the defense knows the deal as does his ASA. So they should do what they want and if it is not in accordance with our agreement we will do whatever we have to do. Ori inal Message From: . (USAFLS) Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 2:52 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Call Can you give the heads up so he doesn't do something unexpected? Original Message From: (USAFLS) Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 2:23 PM To: . (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Call Are you coming back home? Original Message From: . (USAFLS) Sent: Frida , June 13, 2008 11:56 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: Call Hi . We had a good call with the dag's chief of staff. They seem ready to greenlight us. Strangely, just an hour later roy black called to propose a "final solution" (his words not mine). told him to call me. Imagine that). So are you free later for a conf call if he actually calls? 952 EFTA00180236 .(USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: 3:03 PM To: .(USAFLS) Subject: RE: Call He got a strange voice mail from Barry K which the deal was 60 days--he was calling him back to say that is not the deal and the defense knows the deal as does his ASA. So they should do what they want and if it is not in accordance with our agreement we will do whatever we have to do. Original Message From: I. (USAFLS) Sent: Frida iiiii13, 2008 2:52 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Call Can you give the heads up so he doesn't do something unexpected? Ori inal From: (USAFLS) Sent: Frida June Sis.2028 2:23 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Call Are you coming back home? Oatiliiie s . li From: (USAFLS) Sent: Fr' ii13, 2008 11:56 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: Call Hi . We had a good call with the dag's chief of staff. Thagmeem ready to greenlight us. Strangely, just an hour laigr roy black called to propose a "final solution" (his words not mine). IIII told him to call me. (Imagine that). So are you free later for a conf call if he actually calls? 953 EFTA00180237 (USAFLS) From: ‘ (USAFLS) Sent: isis2008 2:52 PM To: USAFLS) Subject: RE Call Can you give IIIIIIIIthe heads up so he doesn't do something unexpected? Ori inal Messa e From: (USAFLS) Sent: Frida June 13 2008 2:23 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Call Are you coming back home? Ori inal Messa e From: (USAFLS) Sent: Frida June 13, 2008 11:56 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: Call Hi I We had a good call with the dag's chief of staff. Thumarm ready to greenlight us. Strangely, just an hour later roy black called J to propose a "final solution" (his words not mine). illItold him to call me. (Imagine that). So are you free later for a conf call if he actually calls? 954 EFTA00180238 .(USAFLS) From: Sent: To: Subject: .(USAFLS) MIS 2008 2:52 PM (USAFLS) RE: Call One week. We told the DAG that we need his decision by end of next week so we can indict on July 1st before the July 7th state trial. Ori inal Mesa From: (USAFLS) Sent: Frida June 13 2008 2:51 PM To: Ill II. (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Call How long after the final decision--if there is such a thing--does he have before we indict? Original Message From: I. (USAFLS) Sent: Frida June 13, 2008 2:45 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Call Hi -- Not today. I am going to meet with about the indictment. Ori inal Message From: (USAFLS) Sent: Fr _ June 116.2.28 (USA PM To: U FLS) Subject: RE: Call Are you coming back home? Original Me iiii From: I. (USAFLS) Sent: Frida June 13, 2008 11:56 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: Call Hi We had a good call with the dag's chief of staff. Th greenlight us. Strangely, just an hour is r roy black called "final solution" (his words not mine). ill told him to call me. So are you free later for a conf call if he actually calls? eem ready to to propose a (Imagine that). 955 EFTA00180239 .(USAFLS) From: .(USAFLS) Sent: SSE 2008 2:45 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Call Hi -- Not today. I am going to meet with about the indictment. Ori inal Message From: (USAFLS) Sent: Frida June jjsmi008 2:23 PM To: IIIIIIIIIIII. (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Call Are you coming back home? Ori in l Message From: I. (USAFLS) Sent: Fri a iii13, 2008 11:56 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: Call Hi . We had a good call with the dag's chief of staff. Thagm eem ready to greenlight us. Strangely, just an hour 1212r roy black called to propose a "final solution" (his words not mine). told him to call me. (Imagine that). So are you free later for a conf call if he actually calls? 956 EFTA00180240 (USAFLS) From: USAFLS) Sent: :23 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: : a Are you coming back home? Original Message From: (USAFLS) Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 11:56 AM To: =EMI= (USAFLS) Subject: Call Hi la We had a good call with the dag's chief of staff. They seem ready to greenlight us. Strangely, just an hour later roy black called Illlito propose a "final solution" (his words not mine). lillitold him to call me71Imagine that). So are you free later for a conf call if he actually calls? 957 EFTA00180241 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: :15 PM To: (FBI) Subject: e:Epstein Sorry. I am at birthday lunch now. I will call as soon as I can. Overall it went well. There is a new development. I will call soon Original Message From: (FBI) To: (USAFLS) Sent: Fri Jun 13 13:05:14 2008 Subject: Epstein How did the conf call gol Sorry couldn't wait longer! 958 EFTA00180242 (USAFLS) From: USAFLS) Sent 2:04 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: : a Not free but good!! Yes but want to talk to you first. We don't want to change our terms!!! Original Message From: (USAFLS) Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 11:56 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: Call Hi I We had a good call with the dag's chief of staff. They seem ready to greenlight us. Strangely, just an hour later roy black called illito propose a "final solution" (his words not mine). illitold him to call rui7Timagine that). So are you free later for a conf call if he actually calls? 959 EFTA00180243 .(USAFLS) From: .(USAFLS) Sent: — 2008 11:56 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: Call Hi . We had a good call with the dag's chief of staff. The seem ready to greenlight us. Strangely, just an hour later roy black called IIII to propose a "final solution" (his words not mine). told him to call me. (Imagine that). So are you free later for a conf call if he actually calls? 960 EFTA00180244 . (USAFLS) From: . (USAFLS) Sent: e11,2008427PM To: (FBI) Subject: YahooSVVAffiapd Attachments: Yahoo Aff.wpd The message is ready to be sent with the following file or link attachments: Yahoo SW Aff.wpd Note: To protect against computer viruses, I-mail programs may prevent sending or receiving certain types of file attachments. Check your I-mail security settings to determine how attachments are handled. 964 EFTA00180245 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: =200 • To: (FBI); (FBI) Subject: FYI A few things. a and I are having a conference call on Friday with the DAG. Time not yet confirmed. attorneys (at least the father) are no small shakes. http://www.wtop.com/?nid=1 04&sid=14 12018 I am going to try to move to the 24th or, preferably, the 1' of July. Let me know if anything new is going on on your end. Thanks. A '. nt U.S. Attorne 966 EFTA00180246 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: une , 00811:49 AM To: SAFLS) Cc: USAFLS) Subject: ccep e : ps einicall in from John Roth Ill end Cyndee - I have an 8:30 sentencing with Judge I lurley and then I am headed down to Miami. If Mr. Roth is available later in the morning I could be there live. Otherwise, please call me on my cell,. 967 EFTA00180247 .(USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: 2008 3:04 PM To: (FBI) Subject: RE: Call from attorney Does she have any criminal history? And can you subpoena her driver's license and autotrack? Thanks. Assistant U.S. Attorney Ori inal MessaLs. From: WI. (FBI) Sent: Frida June 20 8 2:50 PM To: . (USAFLS) Subject: Re: Call from attorney I can do a more extensive phone interview with and locate and cont info on IS . Idont know of anyone else that would have , other I'll check on A file on Monday. Previous phone numbers and/or bills friiiiii05,I istanl ang about gifts, cards and such pertaining to Epstein, , and From: To: Sent: Fri Jun 06 14.Lg2:06 2008 Subject: Call from III attorney Original Message attorney called and she would really like full immunity. I said no, so she will have to come and testify in front of the grand jury and assert the fifth as to each question. I will start putting together a list of questions for her and send it to you. I also am wondering whether we should subpoena any records from her to bring with her to the grand jury. I told him that we will need to see her on a Tuesday in June, he is going to call me back with a date. I also told him that we would pay for her plane ticket but not his. 968 EFTA00180248 Can you try to find out if she has an A-file and, if so, get a copy before then? And do you want to try to interview some other New York people before she comes to testify? Thank you. Assistant U.S. Attorney 969 EFTA00180249 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: r i'l 8 2 To: (FBI): ISIMII. (FBI) Subject: Call from a orney attorney called and she would really like NI immunity. I said no, so she will have to come and testify in front of the grand jury and assert the fifth as to each question. I will start putting together a list of questions for her and send it to you. I also am wondering whether we should subpoena any records from her to bring with her to the grand jury. I told him that we will need to see her on a Tuesday in June, he is going to call me back with a date. I also told him that we would pay for her plane ticket but not his. Can you try to fund out if she has an A-file and, if so, get a copy before then? And do you want to try to interview some other New York people before she comes to testify? Thank you. Assist nt U.S. Attorne 970 EFTA00180250 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: 8 2:54 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: F SDFL pstem From: Roth, John (ODAG) (SMO) Sen : Tuesd 03, 2008 1:30 PM To: (USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS) Subject: RE: SDFL - Epstein thanks. We will be in touch. From: (USAFLS) [malito:Cyndee.Campos@usdoj.gov] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 12:53 PM To: ODAG) Cc: (USAFLS) Subject: SDFL - Epstein «Epstein kr Ofc of DAG 06 03 08.pdf» Sent on behalf of Fi S SDFL. Original signed letter with attachments to follow via Fed Ex. Staff Assistant U.S. Attorney's Office S.D. of Florida 971 EFTA00180251 .(USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: 8 2:54 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: FW: SDFL - Epstein I was also going to send you a hard copy, with fancy tabs. Do you still want? From: (USAFLS) Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 12:53 PM To: th John ODAG) (SMO) Cc: (USAFLS) Subject: SDFL - Epstein Epstein Itr Oft of DAG 06 03 0... Sent on behalf ofilnEEMIMMI. SDFL. Original signed letter with attachments to follow via Fed Ex. Staff Assistant U.S. Attorney's Office S.D. of Florida 972 EFTA00180252 (USAFLS) From: Ann . (USAFLS) Sent: MOS 2008 2:55 PM To: USAFLS) Subject: RE: SDFL - Epstein Yes, please. Thank you! Assistant U.S. Attorne From: Set 1008 2:54 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: FW: SDFL - Epstein I was also going to send you a hard copy, with fancy tabs. Do you still want? From: laM Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 12:53 PM To: DAG) (SMO) Cc: (USAFLS) Subject: SDFL - Epstein « File: Epstein Itr Ofc of DAG 06 03 08.pdf » Sent on behalf o SDFL. Original signed letter with attachments to follow via Fed Ex. Staff Assistant U.S. Attorney's Office Si DdiSla Tracking: 973 EFTA00180253 Recipient Road (USAFLS) Read: G/312008 2:55 PM 974 EFTA00180254 (USAFLS) From: Sent: To: Subject: atter to (USAFLS) 2:19 PM (USAFLS) Hi - Can you send a copy of the letter to me for the file? Thanks. Assistant U.S. Attorne Tracking: 975 EFTA00180255 Recipient Road MIIIIIMIUSAFLS) Read: 6/3/2008 2:53 PM 976 EFTA00180256 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: 03, 2008 1filla m . To: (USAFLS); .(USAFLS) Subject: w: D L - Epstein Fyi Original Message From: Roth John ODAG) (SMO) To: (USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS) Sent: Tue Jun 03 13:29:39 2008 Subject: RE: SDFL - Epstein thanks. We will be in touch. From: (USAFLS) (mailto:Cyndee.Campos@usdoj.gov] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 12:53 PM To: aally_n210DAG) Cc: MM.= (USAFLS) Subject: SDFL - Epstein «E stein ltr Ofc of DAG 06 03 08.pdf» Sent on behalf ofl SDFL. Original signed letter with attachments to follow via Fed Ex. • Staff Assistant U.S. Attorney's Office S.D. of Florida 977 EFTA00180257 . (USAFLS) From: . (USAFLS) Sent: 3, 2 812:14 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: Epstein question Hi I know is running out to the NAC, so I didn't want to bother him about this now. Here is my question. We think that one of the victims in New York has had contact with Epstein's counsel, so the cat is probably out of the bag about our interest in New York. When Epstein signed the Non-Prosecution A reement we withdrew several subpoenas, including a subpoena of one of Epstein's New York assistants, a subpoena for the computer equipment that Roy Black's investigator removed from Epstein's house, and sub oenas to Bear Steams. Can't renew those subpoenas? Bear Stears is about to disappear into JP Morgan, we now believe may be a target, rather than a subject (obviously I would need to let her lawyer know that), and Epstein's motion to quash the computer subpoena was never ruled upon by Judge Marra, who is on the duty wheel again this month. Defense counsel will jump up and down and scream, but do we care anymore? s i tant U.S. Att rne Tracking: 978 EFTA00180258 Recipient Read (USAFLS) Read: 6/3/2008 12:27 PM 979 EFTA00180259 (USAFLS) From: . (USAFLS) Sent: e 03, 200811:33 AM To: (USAFLS)' Subject: RE: please review Importance: High Excellent! Only one typo. At the top of page 13, the sentence that starts "As soon as I became aware of these allegations," you left out the word "I" and you refer to it as the Office of Professional Regulation rather than Responsibility. Also, since you included the self-reports to OPR by you and you may want to include my self-disclosure in the paragraph at the middle of page 14 where I discuss the appointment issue. You also may want to put in a footer reading "Confidential and Privileged — Attorney Work Product" to avoid possible disclosure to the defense. Thanks. From: (USAFLS) Sem 008 10:40 AM To: (US Cc: (USAFLS)11.. (USAFLS) Subject: please review « File: 2DAG060208.wpd » Tracking: 980 EFTA00180260 Recipient allEli (OWLS) 981 Read Read: 8/3/2008 11:48 NA EFTA00180261 (USAFLS) From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Ora Indictment (USAFLS) 118 10:43 AM (USAFLS) SAFLS) i I — called and said that Eneeded a copy of this. The first copy has a "draft" watermark on it, and the second is exactly the same except that the watermark is removed. 080429 revised ndictment with... Thanks! 080429 revised ndictment with... Assis S. Attorne Tracking: 982 EFTA00180262 Recipient Road (USAFLS) Read: 6!3/200810:44 AM (USAFIS) Read: 6131200811:08 AM 983 EFTA00180263 .(USAFLS) From: In (USAFLS) Sent: 8 10.40 AM To: (USA Cc: (USAFLS);11... (USAFLS) Subject: rif 2DAG060208.wp please review 984 EFTA00180264 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: e , 8 9:12 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: 'bona n o Hi 5_ You might want to add that Epstein's publicist, Howard Rubenstein, is also the publicist for The New York Post where the article quoting Lefcourt's letter appeared. Assistant U.S. Attorne Tracking: 985 EFTA00180265 Recipient Read (USAFLS) Read: 6/312008 10:19 AM 986 EFTA00180266 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent e , 9:10 AM To: USAFLS) Subject age i e re Lefcourt Ltr to Acosta.pdf Here it is. Page 6 Article re Lefcourt Ltr... 987 EFTA00180267 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: on , 7:02 PM To: SAFLS) Cc: USAFLS); .( USAFLS) Subject: . . Hi .■ Apparently some fairly reputable news sources are reporting that Epstein has moved significant assets off shore and intends to flee. We are going to try to find out if they have any legitimacy. Assistant U.S. Attorn Tracking: 988 EFTA00180268 Recipient Read SIMIUSAFLS) Read: 6/2/2008 7:02 PM MIIIME(USAELS) Read: 6/3/2008 10:18 AM SIMBIUSAELS) Read: 6/3/2008 8:38 AM 989 EFTA00180269 (USAFLS) From: Sent: To: Subject: (USAFLS) e 6:57 PM (USAFLS) Iii I like it. Any chance we can participate in the meeting? I would like to see these guys in action. Here arc my suggested changes. Feel free to keep or reject any and all. Thanks. Addition to be nserted on pag... Assistant U.S. Attorne Tracking: 990 EFTA00180270 Recipient Read (USAFLS) Read: 6/2/2008 7:00 PM 991 EFTA00180271 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: 8 4:25 PM To: .(USAFLS) Subject: ra t letter to DAG DAG060208.wpd 992 EFTA00180272 . (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: e 02, 2008 12:47 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: Emailing: Conf Plea Negotiations final.wpd Attachments: Conf Plea Negotiations final.wpd Hi -- Here it is. It was presented at the July 31st meeting, I believe. The message is ready to be sent with the following file or link attachments: Conf Plea Negotiations final.wpd Note: To protect against computer viruses, I-mail programs may prevent sending or receiving certain types of file attachments. Check your I -mail security settings to determine how attachments are handled. 993 EFTA00180273 .(USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent e 02, 2008 jj.glialg. To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: Epstein Hi sand ■ — I am back. I will be meeting with this afternoon to go over the latest developments. I was wiling whether you had received a copy of all of Epstein's submissions to the AAG? I don't want to bother if we already have everything. Can you let me know? And have you heard anything about timing? By the way, I am on the CWECF list for the civil suits against Epstein and Mr. Herman's firm has moved for entry of default judgment in one of the civil cases. Could be interesting. Thanks. Assi Tracking: 994 EFTA00180274 Recipient Read (USAFLS) (USAFLS) 995 Road: 6/2/2008 4:26 PM EFTA00180275 .(USAFLS) From: Sent: To: Subject: (FBI) 53 PM (USAFLS) RE: Epstein I just heard from attorney, Brendan White. He informed me that he is representing and that she would not be able to make the June 3rd date and that she will invoke her 5th amendment right unless she is granted immunity. I informed him that was considered a victim/witness but he said that she would still invoke w/o immunity. SOUNDS like he has been well informed. Anyway Mr. White advised he had left you a message so I told him I would let the two of you work out the details. We can meet Monday afternoon and I will fill you in on the rest. I'll let Odell and Atkinson know we are off for Tuesday. Have a great weekend. From: . (USAFLS) Sent: Thursda , Ma 29, 2008 3:24 PM To: I. Subject: Re: Epstein Hi . Very intereting. Is she coming down on her own dime? If she wants us to pay we have to set up the travel. Can you figure that out and if she is showing up this tuesday call atkinson to reserve grand jury time. Ask to put us last in case she is willing to do an interview and them we will not bring her to gj. We may want to video her. Since we aren't indicting on tuesday let's meet monday afternoon to go over everything. Thanks. Ori inal Messa e From: FBI) To: . (USAFLS) Sent: Thu May 29 12:18:50 2008 Subject: RE: Epstein The NY agents made contact with today. She met them at the door with her attorney's card. (she is connected to a target in another FBI investigation) I'll explain later. Anyway, she contacted the agent a few minutes ago and sounded surprised when she was informed it was about Epstein. She switched the conversation immediately about coming to Grand Jury on Tues. The agent left the door open to contact her if she decides to talk to her. I think we should let her travel down here and let and I attempt to interview her prior to putting her in the G3. What do you think? I told the NY agent if should 996 EFTA00180276 reach out to her again to provide her with my name and information as her contact once she gets down here. I do not know if she plans on getting her attorney involved or not. His info is as follows: Diarmuid White of White and White, III telephone number . I have a feeling she will reach out to Epstein, so it could get interesting. We have to schedule time for her in front of G]. Let me know. From: (USAFLS) [ Sent: Thursda May 29, 2008 9:03 AM To: (USAFLS); Cc: (USAFLS); Subject: Epstein (USAFLS) GIs; I Hi and III. I received I-mail stating that the DAG agreed to meet with epstein's people. Does this mean that Tuesday is off? I need to let the gj coordinator know. Also, I am sure that you remember I. She was the person whom we initially classified as a victim until epstein's attorneys complained. Well, has just interviewed a girl who was 14 or 15 when she first went to epstein's house who reports that epstein told her that he had sex with . ( probably would have been 15 or 16 when this conversation occurred.) The girl also reports that she told epstein her true age and epstein told her that he doesn't care about age. I know that epstein's people will, no doubt, continue to tell the dag and others that epstein didn't know about the girls' ages so I thought you should know. Please let me know about tuesday so I don't needlessly spoil sunday. And, any chance the case was discussed with the ag when he was in town? Thanks. 997 EFTA00180277 .(USAFLS) From: . (USAFLS) Sent: 9, 2008 3:24 PM To: . (FBI) Subject: e: Epstein Hi . Very intereting. Is she coming down on her own dime? If she wants us to pay we have to set up the travel. Can you figure that out and if she is showing up this tuesday call atkinson to reserve grand jury time. Ask to put us last in case she is willing to do an interview and them we will not bring her to gj. We may want to video her. Since we aren't indicting on tuesday let's meet monday afternoon to go over everything. Thanks. Ori inal Messa e From: FBI) To: . (USAFLS) Sent: Thu May 29 12:18:50 2008 Subject: RE: Epstein The NY agents made contact with today. She met them at the door with her attorney's card. (she is connected to a target in another FBI investigation) I'll explain later. Anyway, she contacted the agent a few minutes ago and sounded surprised when she was informed it was about Epstein. She switched the conversation immediately about coming to Grand Jury on Tues. The agent left the door open to contact her if she decides to talk to her. I think we should let her travel down here and let and I attempt to interview her prior to putting her in the GJ. What do you think? I told the NY agent if should reach out to her again to provide her with my name and information as her contact once she gets down here. I do not know if she plans on getting her attorney involved or not. His info is as follows: Diarmuid White of White and White, III , telephone number . I have a feeling she will reach out to Epstein, so it could get interesting. We have to schedule time for her in front of GJ. Let me know. From: Sent: Thursda To: Cc: Subject: Epstein (USAFLS) May 29, 2008 9:03 AM USAFLS); (USAFLS); USAFLS) ; Hi and III. I received I-mail stating that the DAG agreed to meet with epstein's people. Does this mean that Tuesday is off? I need to let the gj coordinator know. 998 EFTA00180278 Also, I am sure that you remember= I. She was the person whom we initially classified as a victim until epstein's attorneys complained. Well, has just interviewed a girl who was 14 or 15 when she first went house who reports that epstein told her that he had sex with= probably would have been 15 or 16 when this conversation occurred.) The girl also reports that she told epstein her true age and epstein told her that he doesn't care about age. I know that epstein's people will, no doubt, continue to tell the dag and others that epstein didn't know about the girls' ages so I thought you should know. Please let me know about tuesday so I don't needlessly spoil sunday. And, any chance the case was discussed with the ag when he was in town? Thanks. 999 EFTA00180279 (USAFLS) From: (FBI) Sent: — ' 8 12:19 PM To: . (USAFLS) Subject: E Epstein The NY agents made contact with today. She met them at the door with her attorney's card. (she is connected to a target in another FBI investigation) I'll explain later. Anyway, she contacted the agent a few minutes ago and sounded surprised when she was informed it was about Epstein. She switched the conversation immediately about coming to Grand Jury on Tues. The agent left the door open to contact her if she decides to talk to her. I think we should let her travel down here and let and I attempt to interview her prior to putting her in the GJ. What do you think? I told the NY agent if should reach out to her again to provide her with my name and information as her contact once she gets down here. I do not know if she plans on getting her attorney involved or not. His info is as follows: Diarmuid White of White and White, III Ella telephone number . I have a feeling she will reach out to Epstein, so it could get interesting. We have to schedule time for her in front of GJ. Let me know. From: (USAFLS) Sent: Thursda May 29, 2008 9:03 AM To: USAFLS); 911.6USAFLS Cc: (USAFLS); I'll ; Subject: Epstein Hi and I received I-mail stating that the DAG agreed to meet with epstein's people. Does this mean that Tuesday is off? I need to let the gj coordinator know. I Also, I am sure that you remember It She was the person whom we initially classified as a victim until epstein's attorneys complained. Well, has just interviewed a girl who was 14 or 15 when she first went toliiiiin's house who reports that epstein told her that he had sex with ( probably would have been 15 or 16 when this conversation occurred.) The girl also reports that she told epstein her true age and epstein told her that he doesn't care about age. I know that epstein's people will, no doubt, continue to tell the dag and others that epstein didn't know about the girls' ages so I thought you should know. Please let me know about tuesday so I don't needlessly spoil sunday. And, any chance the case was discussed with the ag when he was in town? 1000 EFTA00180280 1001 • sNuetu EFTA00180281 (USAFLS) From: is, 9,2 4USAFLS) Sent: To: AFLS); FLS) Cc: (USAFL ; (FBI); Subject: Epstein (FBI) Hi and III. I received 'Email stating that the DAG agreed to meet with epstein's people. Does this mean that Tuesday is off? I need to let the gj coordinator know. Also, I am sure that you remember I. She was the person whom we initially classified as a victim until epstein's attorneys complained. Well, has just interviewed a girl who was 14 or 15 when she first went to epstein's house who reports that epstein told her that he had sex with . ( probably would have been 15 or 16 when this conversation occurred.) The girl also reports that she told epstein her true age and epstein told her that he doesn't care about age. I know that epstein's people will, no doubt, continue to tell the dag and others that epstein didn't know about the girls' ages so I thought you should know. Please let me know about tuesday so I don't needlessly spoil sunday. And, any chance the case was discussed with the ag when he was in town? Thanks. 1002 EFTA00180282 (USAFLS) From: Sent: To: Subject: (FBI) 008 6:33 PM (USAFLS) Hey we emailed 1IIIIMOST:) of your comments re any further delays and added a few of our own. The US Atty Gen was here today in MM. I would love to know if Epstein came up. and Acosta were going to present to the DAG reasons not to delay any further. Hopefully they were successful and we ilstill on for Tues. We interviewed Illtoday. She told Epstein her true age, she belvd was 14 or 15. Phone records show contact @ age 16. She said Epstein told her he did not care about age. She also said that E told her he had f***d • 'brought Anyways, I'll fill u in later. NY getting close to locating III We have cell an good address. Keep your fingers crossed. Talk to u soon. From: To: Sent: Tue May 27 23:45:06 2008 Subject: Re: Epstein Original Message (USAFLS) < (USAFLS); Aaaargh. The statute of limitations issue is the state statute of limitations. I think joe says it is two years. The issue is implicated in two ways. First, because of the state's leniency for the first set of girls, the second set have been presented only to us for prosecution. If we cannot go forward, then there will be no prosecution of those crimes. (In response to the argument that joe should just present them now, we believe that some of the victims are unknown to the defense and disclosing them further weakens our case by allowing them to depose and harass those victims.) Second, our "state resolution" of the case requires epstein to plead to something that hasn't been charged yet so further delay will allow him to escape one of the terms of the deal he signed several months ago. (There also is a sol on the private cause of action under 2255 pursuant to which he must pay damages to the girls. The delay will allow him to escape responsibility for that term, too.) Other reasons: The victims are getting older. Clearly one of epstein's arguments will be that he did not know they were minors. The older they are when they testify the more plausible epstein's argument becomes. The grand jury we are using will expire soon. We have already presented more than a dozen hours of testimony and the grand jury is invested and wants to indict. We romised the girls swift justice so they could move on with their lives. is a perfect example of why this is needed. The delay so far has led many to reach out to private lawyers which, in turn, let's e argue that they are only in it for money. 1003 EFTA00180283 Why give him more time? He has had more than a year's delay already for no reason other than the names of the attorneys he can afford to hire. This is not a white collar or other non-violent crime. This is a child exploitation crime with more than 20 known child victims. We are mandated by statute and doj policy to prosecute those cases vigorously and in a timely fashion - whether the children were prostitutes or unwilling victims. Why is this case being treated so differently? Original Message From: (FBI) To: F . (USAFLS) Cc: . (FBI) Sent: Tue May 27 18:45:37 2008 Subject: RE: Epstein Hey Sorry to bother you on your vacation. Apparently the DAG is inclined to allow Epstein's counsel to present further arguments. has requested and i to prepare, in email format, arguments to present to the DAG supporting why the case should not be stalled any further. mentioned statute of limitation issues. I don't know what the specific statute of limitations are (if there are any) for the various counts. Seems like the statute of limitations was for the life of the victim but III not certain. Other points that can be made include the private investigators continuing to contact the victims and the relocation of our victims to various parts of the country. Do you have any suggestions as to what would be our best course of persuasion? Thanks and happy travels. From: Sent: Tuesda To: Cc: Subject: Epstein . (USAFLS) May 27, 2008 2:54 PM USAFLS); (USAFLS) (USAFLS) Hi sent me an email about epstein wanting to do less time. I hope that his request will be denied. The original deal was supposed to be 2 years so he has already gotten a big break. Plus we have identified more victims since we agreed to the 18 months. Please keep me posted. Thanks. 1004 EFTA00180284 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: 00811:17 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: epste n the info about 90 days was something the thought Barry said to him at a meeting. He was trying to confirm it. Talked to and she said the state statute is three years and will run on the victims they have In Oct or so of this year. They are working on the memo for Please don't let this spoil your trip—I know I am spitting Into the wind with this advice but try anywayll II Thought for the day for. —You know you are a redneck if you have ever bought your underwear at a yard salei IIII I 1006 EFTA00180285 (USAFLS) From: USAFLS) Sent: 28, 2008 To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS); Subject: Epstein Please fill me in. Original Message From: (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 9:21 AM To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Epstein (USAFLS) This was info that got from Barry, the state attorney, but he was waiting for an email to confirm. I am much to lowly to have communications with the "star" team. Original Message From: (USAFLS) Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 3:09 PM To: (USAFLS); Cc: (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Epstein (USAFLS) No one has contacted anyone in Miami. Please copy me and communications. Thanks, Original Message From: . (USAFLS) Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 2:54 PM To: (USAFLS); Cc: (USAFLS) Subject: Epstein (USAFLS) on all Hi sent me an email about epstein wanting to do less time. I hope that his request will be denied. The original deal was supposed to be 2 years so he has already gotten a big break. Plus we have identified more victims since we agreed to the 18 months. Please keep me posted. Thanks. 1007 EFTA00180286 .(USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: ilill.2008 1j.4.9,pai.... To: . (FBI); (USAFLS), Subject: Re: Epstein AFB0 Aaaargh. The statute of limitations issue is the state statute of limitations. I think joe says it is two years. The issue is implicated in two ways. First, because of the state's leniency for the first set of girls, the second set have been presented only to us for prosecution. If we cannot go forward, then there will be no prosecution of those crimes. (In response to the argument that joe should just present them now, we believe that some of the victims are unknown to the defense and disclosing them further weakens our case by allowing them to depose and harass those victims.) Second, our "state resolution" of the case requires epstein to plead to something that hasn't been charged yet so further delay will allow him to escape one of the terms of the deal he signed several months ago. (There also is a sol on the private cause of action under 2255 pursuant to which he must pay damages to the girls. The delay will allow him to escape responsibility for that term, too.) Other reasons: The victims are getting older. Clearly one of epstein's arguments will be that he did not know they were minors. The older they are when they testify the more plausible epstein's argument becomes. The grand jury we are using will expire soon. We have already presented more than a dozen hours of testimony and the grand jury is invested and wants to indict. We romised the girls swift justice so they could move on with their lives. is a perfect example of why this is needed. The delay so far has led many to reach out to private lawyers which, in turn, let's e argue that they are only in it for money. Why give him more time? He has had more than a year's delay already for no reason other than the names of the attorneys he can afford to hire. This is not a white collar or other non-violent crime. This is a child exploitation crime with more than 20 known child victims. We are mandated by statute and doj policy to prosecute those cases vigorously and in a timely fashion - whether the children were prostitutes or unwilling victims. Why is this case being treated so differently? Ori inal Messa e From: FBI) To: . (USAFLS) Cc: . (FBI) Sent: Tue May 27 18:45:37 2008 1008 EFTA00180287 Subject: RE: Epstein Hey I Sorry to bother you on your vacation. Apparently the DAG is inclined to allow Epstein's counsel to present further arguments. IM=Inhas requested elElland I to prepare, in email format, arguments to present to the DAG supporting why the case should not be stalled any further. liMmentioned statute of limitation issues. I don't know what the specific statute of limitations are (if there are any) for the various counts. Seems like the statute of limitations was for the life of the victim but not certain. Other points that can be made include the private investigators continuing to contact the victims and the relocation of our victims to various parts of the country. Do you have any suggestions as to what would be our best course of persuasion? Thanks and happy travels. From: (USAFLS) [ Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 2:54 PM To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS) Subject: Epstein Hi MI GM sent me an email about epstein wanting to do less time. I hope that his request will be denied. The original deal was supposed to be 2 years so he has already gotten a big break. Plus we have identified more victims since we agreed to the 18 months. Please keep me posted. Thanks. 1009 EFTA00180288 (USAFLS) From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Hey (FBI) 6:46 PM (USAFLS) Sorry to bother you on your vacation. Apparently the DAG is inclined to allow E stein's counsel to present further arguments. has requested and I to prepare, in email format, arguments to present to the DAG supporting why the case should not be stalled any further. mentioned statute of limitation issues. I don't know what the specific statute of limitations are (if there are any) for the various counts. Seems like the statute of limitations was for the life of the victim but I'm not certain. Other points that can be made include the private investigators continuing to contact the victims and the relocation of our victims to various parts of the country. Do you have any suggestions as to what would be our best course of persuasion? Thanks and happy travels. From: . (USAFLS) [ Sent: Tuesda May 27, 2008 2:54 PM To: (USAFLS); Cc: (USAFLS) Subject: Epstein (USAFLS) Hi sent me an email about epstein wanting to do less time. I hope that his request will be denied. The original deal was supposed to be 2 years so he has already gotten a big break. Plus we have identified more victims since we agreed to the 18 months. Please keep me posted. Thanks. 1010 EFTA00180289 matches this may not be our gal. There is no record of a IIIIII Choicepoint or Accurint matching her description. We'll keep trying. (USAFLS) From: Sent: To: Subject: Hi la Just heard people and they aren't starter. Let's plan to will spend monday with From To: Sent: Tue May 27 Subject: RE: Mtg Original Message (USAFLS) 4:03 PM back from Theu haven't heard anything from epstein's interested in renegotiating so I msg is a non- meet sunday at 1:30 at my house775a is okay. Then I miami. Thanks. (FBI) (USAFLS) 12:24:22 2008 Hope you are having a Great time and busy when u get back:) BEI is out able to handle it. Let me know what resting up. afraid our days will be on Sunday, but I think u and I should be time, I will keep the day open. New York is not going well. The Agents are still trying to locate IIIIII (we now know here last name) but no luck thus far. When we ran the name in TECS, a IIIIIII dob departed Miami on Jan 28, 2008 for Brazil and has not returned. We can not connect this with New York so although the age in We have spoken to the parents and a family attorney for but she does not want to speak with us. The Agents will keep at it this wee in hopes that they will be able to locate and interview her. I'll email you as soon as I have more to report. It appears . is residing in North Carolina now. Her house here is up for sale. We spoke with her mother and asked her to have contact us. The subpoenas u left have all been served. We had to redo Verizon's at their request but they said they could get us the info this week. Negative results at the storage unit. Unfortunately not much to report but we will stay at it. Email a time for Sunday and I let u know if we have any further developments. From: . (USAFLS) ( Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 9:37 AM loll EFTA00180290 To: Subject: Mtg Hi guys. Hope all is well. I understand that has explained the status. Can we meet on sunday june 1st to finalize everything so I can meet with ■ on monday and we can present on tuesday? And what is the status of new york? Thanks 1012 EFTA00180291